George Soros 60 Minutes Interview

[fat wee robin]

it reminded me of Eli Weisle's Night. He begs his father not to die, his father begs him to let him go, then he feels guilty because after his dad dies he feels relieved. The desire to live is a strong one, it seems to me he was just glad to be alive.

It seems to me he has a sociopathic personality ,incapable of love ,even of his own kind . Enjoys the game of survival just like those of criminal minds .

 

[GoldenBoy89]

After reading through many of the posts on this topic, gee, color me shocked that the #walkaway movement keeps growing. Soon the ‘blue wave’ will be broken down to one last swirl around the toilet bowl.

 

[LivingWordUnity]

Where did I say I didn't like it?

Then what are you trying to say?

 

[GoldenBoy89]

I get the feeling that some people aren't happy with my thread.

I thought it was funny so I know you're not talking about me.

 

[Kentonio]

Where exactly does the OP slander the 14 year old Jewish boy? Point it out specifically if you will.

Please don’t try and insult people’s intelligence. This entire op (like the half a dozen previous ones on the same subject) are intended solely to promote the false narrative that a prominent Democratic donor collaborated with the Nazis. The fact it’s a barefaced lie and a slander against a Jew, using the single most offensive possible event in human history, is apparently not sufficient to make some people stop doing it.

Personally I’m not sure how implying a 14 year old Jewish child helped the monsters who murdered 6 million of his own people is a Christian thing to do. Then again it’s a free country and religious people can take that up with their own god. I will however continue to call out these vile lies every time they are repeated, even if a poster chooses to propulgate them under a shield of ‘just asking what people think’. Personally I consider it a moral obligation.

 

[Go Braves]

Then what are you trying to say?

Exactly what I already said.

 

[Hank77]

You might want to research György Schwartz (George Soros) further. He has said it was the best of time of his life, and he had, and has, no regrets.

In what context did he make this statement. When? Why? What? How? that it was the best time of his life.

As was i.

It was clear as a bell.

 

[Hank77]

Don't bother. I've read many of them. I know what he said. I know how folks on your side like to spin it.

I asked that the source be posted. I'm interested in hearing it. Hopefully, brinny can find it.

 

[brinny]

In what context did he make this statement. When? Why? What? How? that it was the best time of his life.

He was referring to when he was helping to take property from the Jewish people with his protector, as the Jewish people were being corralled to be taken to the gas chambers.

 

[brinny]

I asked that the source be posted. I'm interested in hearing it. Hopefully, brinny can find it.

i will try to find it.

 

[grasping the after wind]

Please don’t try and insult people’s intelligence. This entire op (like the half a dozen previous ones on the same subject) are intended solely to promote the false narrative that a prominent Democratic donor collaborated with the Nazis. The fact it’s a barefaced lie and a slander against a Jew, using the single most offensive possible event in human history, is apparently not sufficient to make some people stop doing it.

Personally I’m not sure how implying a 14 year old Jewish child helped the monsters who murdered 6 million of his own people is a Christian thing to do. Then again it’s a free country and religious people can take that up with their own god. I will however continue to call out these vile lies every time they are repeated, even if a poster chooses to propulgate them under a shield of ‘just asking what people think’. Personally I consider it a moral obligation.

Really? So saying "here's an interview . What do think of the guy giving it?" linking to the interview and placing some quotes from that interview in one's post without comment on those quotes, is slander. And if anyone doesn't see that as the case they are insulting people's intelligence? I'd really like to see Soros take that to court and see how he fared in proving slander.

slander

noun
Definition of slander (Entry 2 of 2)

1 : the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation

2 : a false and defamatory oral statement about a person — compare libel

Even if you meant libel I can't see how what is done in the OP remotely qualifies .

libel
noun

li·bel | \ ˈlī-bəl \
Definition of libel
(Entry 1 of 2)

1a : a written statement in which a plaintiff in certain courts sets forth the cause of action or the relief sought

b archaic : a handbill especially attacking or defaming someone

2a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression

b(1) : a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt

(2) : defamation of a person by written or representational means

(3) : the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures

(4) : the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel


Correctly quoting one's own words in context still seems to me to be nothing resembling either slander or libel. Unless the year is 1984 again.

 

[LostMarbels]

Henry Kissinger and George Soros are the two largest geopolitical superpowers world wide. Globalist elites as they say.

You will be hard pressed to not find them in every political arena concerning american politics, and combined, even harder pressed to not have seen them in pictures with every known political figure in your life time.

From Princess Diana, Queen Elisabeth, George bush, Obama, Macron, Trump.... you name it. Combined, they have been in every oval office, Parliament, or government establishment commonly known to man.

Why is this important? You would have to go to a library from time to time. Read their books. They spell it all out in plain English by their own writings.

 

[Kentonio]

Really? So saying "here's an interview . What do think of the guy giving it?" linking to the interview and placing some quotes from that interview in one's post without comment on those quotes, is slander. And if anyone doesn't see that as the case they are insulting people's intelligence? I'd really like to see Soros take that to court and see how he fared in proving slander.

Lots of things wouldn’t stand up to the burden of proof required by a court, yet that doesn’t change their accuracy. Without the implication that Soros collaborated, this thread is utterly meaningless. If you feel differently, please explain it’s significance.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

Really? So saying "here's an interview . What do think of the guy giving it?" linking to the interview and placing some quotes from that interview in one's post without comment on those quotes, is slander. And if anyone doesn't see that as the case they are insulting people's intelligence? I'd really like to see Soros take that to court and see how he fared in proving slander.

slander

noun
Definition of slander (Entry 2 of 2)

1 : the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation

2 : a false and defamatory oral statement about a person — compare libel

Even if you meant libel I can't see how what is done in the OP remotely qualifies .

libel
noun

li·bel | \ ˈlī-bəl \
Definition of libel
(Entry 1 of 2)

1a : a written statement in which a plaintiff in certain courts sets forth the cause of action or the relief sought

b archaic : a handbill especially attacking or defaming someone

2a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression

b(1) : a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt

(2) : defamation of a person by written or representational means

(3) : the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures

(4) : the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel


Correctly quoting one's own words in context still seems to me to be nothing resembling either slander or libel. Unless the year is 1984 again.

Ooh! I love this game of let's pretend everyone has amnesia!

 

[Hank77]

George Soros is a major donor for the Democratic party and for many left-wing political activist groups. So his biography/background is relevant to American politics.

What do you think about him telling Mandela how to protect South Africa from investors like him? Maybe we should be asking him the same thing?

 

[Hank77]

He was referring to when he was helping to take property from the Jewish people with his protector, as the Jewish people were being corralled to be taken to the gas chambers.

I listen to that video twice, he never said that.
In fact, the transcript written in the OP is what he did say.

 

[brinny]

I listen to that video twice, he never said that.
In fact, the transcript written in the OP is what he did say.

I never said it was in this particular video. I posted earlier that he's been interviewed many times.

 

[Hank77]

I never said it was in this particular video. I posted earlier that he's been interviewed many times.

Well that what I thought you meant to begin with, that it was said in another video.

 

[brinny]

Well that what I thought you meant to begin with, that it was said in another video.

That's why i was confused that you posted above that you watched the above video twice, in post #76 as if to check if he said it in the above video.

I watched the video as well. i was referring to another source.

I am attempting to locate it.

 

[Kentonio]

I never said it was in this particular video. I posted earlier that he's been interviewed many times.

In none of those videos did he say what you’re saying. I provided the context of that ‘happiest time of my life’ quote on the previous page.