There is no way to prove that their dating on the stars is correct or incorrect. The only way would be to wate and ask God.
Upvote
0
Originally posted by aaron
the thing with that is that it is real ruff and no way to be sure
Originally posted by seesaw
LOL that doesn't change the fact that you can't create the earth and adam and eve with out creating the universe on the first day. The bible imo needs to be worked on so it can make sence.
Originally posted by seesaw
Well if god is so powerful that he can create the universe in six days why doesn't he come to earth himself and talk to everyone on earth face to face. There is only a book that we are suppose to take as truth without any evidence backing it up. I know if I was god I would come to earth and talk to everyone face to face.
Originally posted by seesaw
Name three things that nasa has been really wrong on.
Really what about the flood story there is no evidence for a global flood.
Originally posted by seesaw
Fine I give you that one, but can you show me where the dating of the stars are wrong that is what we were talking about.
Originally posted by themeecer
How about accounts in most major ancient civilizations of a great flood?
How about fossils all over the world?
Originally posted by themeecer
Can you give me evidence that their process of dating stars is accurate? Unless you can travel in time to when the stars were made, you can't.
Science is the study of observable facts over time. No one has ever seen a star born.
Originally posted by seesaw
How do you know jesus was god just cause he said so, and if he came once why doesn't he come all the time.
Originally posted by seesaw
There is only evidence of a local flood. If there was a global flood it would have been accepted by science by now.
Originally posted by seesaw
BTW they have seen a star born and die (you know supernova).