Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ask those 38,000 how we got our moon and watch them come together into just a handful of theories.I was going to make that same point: Why only a handful of moon theories, while there are so many 'god' concepts, through so many thousands of religions and sects?
David said that's their trademark moniker (Psalm 14:1).Amazing anyone takes them seriously anymore. Like the old saying 'Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me' ..'fool me 6 times...forget about it'.
From God's perspective: one -- from mans': seven.Right, because there's only been... how many versions of the Bible? Over 100.
Ask those 38,000 how we got our moon and watch them come together into just a handful of theories.
There may be 38,000, but just like a stretched accordion, you play one particular note and watch that accordion compress.
Science says the snake lost his legs.
Reptiles live the longest. They continue to grow and do not stop growing. Down in Florida they have turtles that are over 300 years old. Perhaps that is why the Dino's got so big. They had a long life and just kept growing. Crocs get pretty big also. But they usually shoot them when they get to big to manage and control.
I can't believe this old chestnut is still floating around. Here's a thought, instead of just making something up, why don't Creationists explain to us why dinosaurs don't have the body configurations of a lizard, turtle or croc that simply kept growing and instead have body configurations for what we'd expect for beings that would have been those sizes and proportions if that was their natural adult size?
We don't understand why quantum physics works, but we use it to make our cell phones function.
Any creature that evolved from a created kind, would be natural. The nature of the day that allowed the rapid evolving would allow it in proportion. How would it not? You may not be a chestnut, but you are roasted.I can't believe this old chestnut is still floating around. Here's a thought, instead of just making something up, why don't Creationists explain to us why dinosaurs don't have the body configurations of a lizard, turtle or croc that simply kept growing and instead have body configurations for what we'd expect for beings that would have been those sizes and proportions if that was their natural adult size?
My dad collected autographs. I never heard of a copy being called an original."originals" are copies of the autographs
GAP's do not try to explain anything. You could check with a Theistic Evolutionists. They may try to explain it.Does Creationism explain why they sometimes have atavistic legs?
GAP's do not try to explain anything. You could check with a Theistic Evolutionists. They may try to explain it.
Yes -- one of the reasons anyway.Is that why you find it so easy to claim brotherhood with the vast majority of christians who don't take the bible literally?
If these scientific theories are falsifiable, then what's keeping you guys from falsifying them?Of course - there is evidence and models to support the various falsifiable scientific theories on the origin of the moon.
Shouldn't we value the original autographs above any mere translation?My dad collected autographs. I never heard of a copy being called an original.
Well, actually, in the above example I cited, the ORIGINAL #1 is what is called an "autograph", which is something written in the author's own handwriting.That's an odd example to use. The original wording of the revelation is preserved, despite the original roll having been destroyed.
You might want to go back and read Jeremiah 36 again.Well, actually, in the above example I cited, the ORIGINAL #1 is what is called an "autograph", which is something written in the author's own handwriting.
Your signature, for instance, is your autograph; but your autograph isn't necessarily a signature, as it can be anything written in your handwriting (recipe, directions, shopping list, etc.).
Also, the ORIGINAL #2 is an autograph as well, since it too was written in Jeremiah's handwriting.
Okay, Baruch wrote it, but the point is the same: autographs vs. originals.You might want to go back and read Jeremiah 36 again.
We'll you are doing a very poor job of it. If we live in a fantasy world you don't expect us to give it up for your fantasy world.No, we're here to try and help you out of your fantasy world.
As explained in Genesis 1:1.There is no doubt God created the heavens including the stars.
The “formless and empty” earth and the stars are included, but they are not included as being ‘made’ or ‘created’. They were simply mentioned as existing.The fact that they are included clearly in the creation week,
My Re-Creation theory does not cut them out, it simply explains them differently from your Different State Past theory.as well as the way creation is spoken of in the rest of the bible does not support cutting them out.
The verse was to show how God most likely revealed the creation events in Genesis 1 through visions since no human was present to observe the actual events.What does that verse have to do with not knowing what a day is?
I already supported it.Support for this claim?
The “great lights” mentioned here is referring to the “two great lights” (the sun and moon) as described in Genesis 1, not the stars. The stars are only being described as ‘ruling’ the night along with the moon. They are not described as being 'made' during the six day creation events.ps 136: 7 To him that made great lights: for his mercy endureth for ever: 8 The sun to rule by day: for his mercy endureth for ever: 9 The moon and stars to rule by night: for his mercy endureth for ever.
Of course they were -- in the same way a commercial bus can be ‘made’ into a private bus for your personal use.So they were made to do stuff for us,
Since the empty earth and the stars were not described as being 'created' or 'made' during the six day creation events, then the earth and stars could have existed for millions of years before those events.it is logical we were not arriving millions of years later after the fact.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?