I think it's time we put this silly argument to bed once and for all.
If Paul is actually saying that we as believers are delivered from the Law of God...
Romans 7
Why is Paul stating that it is this very same Law of God (that you claim he now has nothing to do with as a believer) that STILL tells him what is right and wrong?
(V.7) What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, "YOU SHALL NOT COVET."
Why would Paul call something that we have been delivered from holy, righteous and good. Why in the world would we need to be delivered from something that is Holy, Righteous and Good? Isn't that what we must strive for as belivers?
(V.12) So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.
Why would Paul make sure that people NOT misunderstand and think that it's God's holy Law that is the cause of death? Rather it is SIN. Not the Law of God that is Good!
(V.13) Therefore did that which is good become a cause of death for me? May it never be! Rather it was sin, in order that it might be shown to be sin by effecting my death through that which is good, so that through the commandment sin would become utterly sinful.
Why would Paul tell us that the Law of God is Spiritual if we are to be delivered from it? Should we who have been born again of the Spirit cling to everything Spiritual of God?
(V.14) For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin.
Why would Paul tell us that he agrees with the Law of God if he is delivered from it? That's just plain silly. Why would he admit and confess once again that the Law of God is good?
(V.16) But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good.
Why would Paul Joyfully rejoice and agree with the Law of God if he was delivered from it?
(V.22) For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man,
Why would Paul SERVE the Law of God if he was delivered from it? Case closed.
(V.25) Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin.
I think it's safe to say that Paul NEVER taught or believed or lived his life as if believers are delivered from the holy, perfect, righteous and Spiritual Law of God.
If you can't see that...especially when it's in the exact same passage...then...I don't know what else to say.
Hopefully others can see the fallacy in the "delivered from the Law of God" argument.