Let's take a look at Franklin Graham's moral inconsistencies between his comments on Bill Clinton's sexual scandals in 1998 versus his comments on Donald Trump's sexual scandals in 2018.
Franklin Graham condemning Bill Clinton in 1998:
"Bill Clinton's months-long extramarital sexual behavior in the Oval Office now concerns him and the rest of the world, not just his immediate family. If he will lie to or mislead his wife and daughter, those with whom he is most intimate, what will prevent him from doing the same to the American public?" (
What Franklin Graham Said About the “Private Sins” of Bill Clinton in 1998)
Franklin Graham defending Donald Trump in 2018:
“I think some of these things — that’s for him and his wife to deal with. I think when the country went after President Clinton, the Republicans, that was a great mistake that should never have happened. And I think the same with Stormy Daniels and so forth is nobody’s business. And we’ve got other business at hand that we need to deal with.” (Article linked below in the excerpt)
Article excerpt:
Evangelist Franklin Graham Says Donald Trump's Alleged Affair Is 'Nobody's Business'
But Graham seems to have forgotten that he was one of the people who went after Clinton for his affair, penning a commentary piece for the Wall Street Journal in 1998 titled
“Clinton's Sins Aren't Private.” "Much of America seems to have succumbed to the notion that what a person does in private has little bearing on his public actions or job performance, even if he is the president of the United States,” Graham writes, in a sentence that could just as easily apply today to the opposite end of the political spectrum. (End of the article excerpt)
Evangelist Franklin Graham seems to have had a change of heart on the moral issue if the President's marital infidelity concerns the rest of the world or if it's no one else's business. Based upon Graham's own words, I think I can fairly assume that this moral issue will solely depend upon if he politically supports that particular President or not. Franklin Graham, like James Dobson, seems to sway with the political tide on which moral issues concerning the President he will be morally indignant over depending upon who the President is at that particular time and if he supports that President.
James Dobson condemning Bill Clinton in 1998:
"Character does matter. You can't run a family, let alone a country without it. How foolish to believe that a person who lacks honesty and moral integrity is qualified to lead a nation and the world."
(
I’m an evangelical. The religious right leaders who support Trump don’t speak for me.)
James Dobson defending Donald Trump in 2016:
"I’m not under any illusions that he is an outstanding moral example. It’s a cliché but true: We are electing a commander-in-chief, not a theologian-in-chief.”
(
What James Dobson Said in 1998 About Moral Character and the Presidency)