• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Forum experiments

Is this chip a good thing??

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
français;44390582 said:
Oh come on Carey, let us be realistic here.. No one is going to use this stupid chip. It is something that has existed for 50 years, but it is just now being discussed.. and mainly by the neo Christians who actually believe it is going to happen.

No one is going to have this stupid chip in them. Nor is anyone going to make someone do such. If anything, it would be put in criminals to catch criminals who escape and to help officers locate where criminals like pedophiles are.

But come on. That is all. We all know that.

I did not know that :eek:

So if they start puting them into felons that would cover horrible criminals that have gotten behind more than 1000 dollars in Child support in Kentucky .

Or had more tha 3 DWI's in Texas.

oR been falsly convicted of some other similar horrible crime.....^_^
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
Namaste Carey,

what is a "beddist"? someone that stays in bed alot?

perhaps you could summarize the point of the video which, in my estimation, would significantly increase the chances that you'd get an actual discussion.

metta,

~v

Are you familiar with verichip??

The cideo goes into the pros and cons of the verichip.
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
old data

1) The Argos transmitters for bird migration don't supply GPS Data (you can see that on there site if you bother)
2) the GPS transmitters that the do have only transmit data at a maximum of 24 times per day.
http://www.telonics.com



Thats the point even civilians can afford this stuff and have access to it.

So the government being able to track something smaller from satelite is obvious for anyone with common sense.

Until we unveiled the stealth aircraft we had for decades before making it public people would have sounded like you if I had told them the governement had it.
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
at least you could use more current data :sigh:
http://www.telonics.com/products/argosAvian/

and there GPS unit that CAN track location (though only 24 updates per day)
http://www.telonics.com/literature/tgw-3780/
3780-1.jpg

:doh:

Thats the point even civilians can afford this stuff and have access to it.

So the government being able to track something smaller from satelite is obvious for anyone with common sense.

Until we unveiled the stealth aircraft we had for decades before making it public people would have sounded like you if I had told them the governement had it.
 
Upvote 0

vajradhara

Diamond Thunderbolt of Indestructable Wisdom
Jun 25, 2003
9,403
466
57
Dharmadhatu
✟34,720.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Are you familiar with verichip??

The cideo goes into the pros and cons of the verichip.

i'm somewhat aware of it.

of course it's somewhat irrelevant now with the ubiquitous cellphone usage we see.

metta,

~v
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
i'm somewhat aware of it.

of course it's somewhat irrelevant now with the ubiquitous cellphone usage we see.

metta,

~v

It is a bit different would'nt you agree if all Governments required the chip

for security purposes and/ or global warming to reduce energy used to create cards money paper trail etc.

There could be many reasons to justify mandatory chipping.

I guess the question is what do you think of mandatory chipping.
 
Upvote 0

Vainglorious

Regular Member
Jan 28, 2006
326
38
✟676.00
Faith
Atheist
:doh:

Thats the point even civilians can afford this stuff and have access to it.

So the government being able to track something smaller from satelite is obvious for anyone with common sense.

Until we unveiled the stealth aircraft we had for decades before making it public people would have sounded like you if I had told them the governement had it.

Spoken like a true conspiracy nut. When faced with lack of evidence just invent unfalsifiable claims about unevidenced government programs.
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
Spoken like a true conspiracy nut. When faced with lack of evidence just invent unfalsifiable claims about unevidenced government programs.

:doh:

Does the governemnt admit having classified programs??

Did the governemnt eventuall reveal some classified programs ??

Recent history and stealth technology alone would shoow onnly a complete idiot would assume the tracking technology and info on tracking technology
that civilains can get their hands on is nothing compared to the classified better technology possessed by the most powerful nations on earth...^_^
 
Upvote 0

BrainHertz

Senior Member
Nov 5, 2007
564
28
Oregon
✟23,340.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
And yes the chips would just make it easier than tattoos because they can be tracked from a greater distance and vety soon will be able to track from satelite.

Not very likely.

For satellite tracking anytime soon, you'd need a GPS receiver with an antenna much too large to fit in such a chip, plus a means to reatransmit the positional information to some sort of network (such as a cellular network) also needing an antenna too large to fit in that package, and a power source of non-trivial capacity.

The limit of the chips mentioned in the video and subsequent posts is the readout of an ID number from a reading device which needs to be very close to the chip itself.
 
Upvote 0

Beanieboy

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2006
6,297
1,214
62
✟65,132.00
Faith
Christian
Restated answer:

I think there are potential benefits from it. Many conspiracy theorists will probably call it The Mark, or think the government is tracking them, but I doubt the government is going to be tracking where people's children are going, unless they have a lot of time on their hands.
 
Upvote 0

vajradhara

Diamond Thunderbolt of Indestructable Wisdom
Jun 25, 2003
9,403
466
57
Dharmadhatu
✟34,720.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Namaste Carey,

thank you for the post.

It is a bit different would'nt you agree if all Governments required the chip

of course. i am not in favor of governments mandating surgical procedures for any being.

I guess the question is what do you think of mandatory chipping.

i think it doesn't exist.

metta,

~v
 
Upvote 0

BrainHertz

Senior Member
Nov 5, 2007
564
28
Oregon
✟23,340.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Recent history and stealth technology alone would shoow onnly a complete idiot would assume the tracking technology and info on tracking technology
that civilains can get their hands on is nothing compared to the classified better technology possessed by the most powerful nations on earth...^_^

Why? Does the US government have better laws of physics than civilians?
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
Namaste Carey,

thank you for the post.



of course. i am not in favor of governments mandating surgical procedures for any being.



i think it doesn't exist.

metta,

~v

You right it does not yet exist.^_^

So you dont think it would be a good thing then??:scratch:
 
Upvote 0

Vainglorious

Regular Member
Jan 28, 2006
326
38
✟676.00
Faith
Atheist
Yes but if the whole world is Chipped to buy or sell that fits the Bible description of the mark of the beast.

Including the 1,000,000,000 or so people who live on the proverbial "dollar a day"? These people don't even have electricity and you are claiming they will be integrated into a global monetary system. But why let a few little facts get in the way of a paranoid conspiracy.
 
Upvote 0

Carey

Contributor
Aug 17, 2006
9,624
161
61
Texas
✟40,839.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Others
Not very likely.

For satellite tracking anytime soon, you'd need a GPS receiver with an antenna much too large to fit in such a chip, plus a means to reatransmit the positional information to some sort of network (such as a cellular network) also needing an antenna too large to fit in that package, and a power source of non-trivial capacity.

The limit of the chips mentioned in the video and subsequent posts is the readout of an ID number from a reading device which needs to be very close to the chip itself.

:confused:


Did you read about the last 5 posts??...sheesh:doh:
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.