We all know you believe the Earth is flat and that the sun orbits the earth. Anything else Dad?Genesis 1. Science has none, so that will have to do.
Upvote
0
We all know you believe the Earth is flat and that the sun orbits the earth. Anything else Dad?Genesis 1. Science has none, so that will have to do.
Which came first according to Genesis 1? the earth or the sun?We all know you believe the Earth is flat and that the sun orbits the earth. Anything else Dad?
Genesis has no validity in the physical world. Therefore it matters not what it says.Which came first according to Genesis 1? the earth or the sun?
They exist, so they are evidence that they exist. The clockwork precision is evidence of a Designer.
Genesis has no validity in the physical world.
I see that you did not understand his answer.Your opinion aside, which came first in Genesis 1?
News to me. But thanks for the attempted slander I guess.We all know you believe the Earth is flat and that the sun orbits the earth. Anything else Dad?
Yes!!!! They even invented calendars to reflect the regularity! They can even predict full moons. I would hardly view all that as some chaotic fluke.Clockwork precision?
Debatable! I challenge your fishbowl model of the universe! It may be very very very very very very very very very very very different than you believe.The universe is "built" in such a way that galaxies are slamming into each other and ripping each other apart on a regular basis.
Imaginary age for earth and vicinity is of no value. I suggest our universe is just over 6000 years old. I suggest that the way you derive distances (through time and beliefs about forces and laws far beyond where you ever will go) is very very wrong, therefore the sizes are UNKNOWN for stars. What you call a galaxy may be closer to a Christmas ornament in size! How would we know? In other words the galactic sized crashes and chaos is mostly in your head maybe.If that is clockwork precision, I wouldn't let the builder of that universe anywhere near something I need to have built. (in fact, our own galaxy is most likely due to one in 4.5 billion years)
News to me. But thanks for the attempted slander I guess.
More importantly, the physical world has little validity in Genesis!Genesis has no validity in the physical world. Therefore it matters not what it says.
They like telling us what we think.News to me. But thanks for the attempted slander I guess.
Maybe we have more actual thoughts to work with!They like telling us what we think.
After all, they won't tell us what they think; but they're quick to tell us what we think.
Despite the shock to your system, yes, man was created the same week as all other life on earth. Seriously. To suggest otherwise is fantasy.So you must live on fantasy island then?
If you're not going to be serious we can forget it.
No argument there!Maybe we have more actual thoughts to work with!
The right track?Then we can forget it because you are obviously on something.
I have believed in evolution for many years but now in my 60s and starting to have doubts. I mean if we look at fish they have always been fish, I have never seen a fish turn into a bird. Also when I went to the zoo a few weeks ago I asked myself if we evolved from monkeys then why are these monkeys still here, surely if evolution was true then monkeys wouldn't be about? But they are, so it now makes sense to me that man did not evolve from the monkeys.
I am also skeptical about ants, was there really a common ancestor, if so what was it? A mini ant? But ants are already small. Also it's hard to vision sea plankton evolving from a rock because that's what evolution says, it says organisms came from matter and rocks originally. Sounds like a fairy-tale to me. I used to be an orthodox Christian but now I'm a spiritualist. There are cases of ectoplasm spirits telling humans in the séance room that evolution is a hoax. Am I on the right path? Are the spirits right and evolution is a hoax?
Please comment and let me know.
Tyler Snotgern MU
You believe in genesis but not the BibleNews to me. But thanks for the attempted slander I guess.