Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why did you take him off of ignore?
For one thing, you are wrong. Millions of christians accept evolution and find no need to abandon any good moral ideas. Millions of atheists also have good moral ideas and accept evolution. Good moral ideas and evolution are not mutually exclusive.
Your interpretation of the Bible, you mean.God of course.
I said some really good morals.
God of course.
The Bible rejects evolution, therefore I reject evolution.Why do you reject evolution?
The Bible rejects evolution, therefore I reject evolution.
By the same logic, the Bible also rejects the theory of gravity, germ theory, heliocentrism, and the existence of the Americas. So you'd better start rejecting those, too.
Your interpretation of the Bible, you mean.
Unless, God speaks directly to you....
By the same logic, the Bible also rejects the theory of gravity, germ theory, heliocentrism, and the existence of the Americas. So you'd better start rejecting those, too.
By the same logic, the Bible also rejects ...
... the theory of gravity,
germ theory,
heliocentrism,
... and the existence of the Americas.
So you'd better start rejecting those, too.
You da man! You da man!Not quite. The Bible gives a specific creation story. Now, whether one wants to read that literally or not is quite up to the individual. The Bible is absolutely silent on gravity, germ theory, nearly silent on heliocentrism (a tenuous case can indeed be made that the Bible promotes geocentrism), and the Americas. But the Bible is not silent on how man was created, and if read literally, is in direct conflict with the Theory of Evolution. So, as painful to admit as it is, AV actually has a point on this one.
There are other views on this. I don't know enough about them, however, this gentleman seems to have all his cards in his deck.
Just another look at it..
Taxonomic nested hierarchies dont support Darwinism transformed cladism rocks | Uncommon Descent
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?