Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So you still don´t understand the point.
Do you want to understand the point? I am asking sincerely, since I don´t want to waste my time.
Ok, so much for the personal insults.Waste your time, a man dedicated to picking on religious people on the internet? Your time is already wasted before you barged into this conversation in search of an argument to buttress your hobby.
The point of the OP is the validity of the FSM-analogy. In order to discuss the validity of the analogy you´d first have to understand it. All I have been doing here for quite some time is trying to explain it - apparently to no avail. Do you want to understand it, or do you want to keep responding before you have understood it?There is the point of the OP, that's my foundation in these discussions. if you have a point or motive to your descent then state it.
"Reason is the test of ridicule, not ridicule the test of truth." -Warburton, William
Ok, so much for the personal insults.
The point of the OP is the validity of the FSM-analogy. In order to discuss the validity of the analogy you´d first have to understand it. All I have been doing here for quite some time is trying to explain it - apparently to no avail. Do you want to understand it, or do you want to keep responding before you have understood it?
And this is exactly what the FSM-analogy is asking for: A working test/method to distinguish ridiculous supernatural claims from valid supernatural claims."Reason is the test of ridicule[...]"
......And Atheist tend to think the claims of religious people are not real.
I have no evidence that will convince you beyond your customary stock arguments. In addition to my own relationship with Christ there are other evidences that are convincing to me.
We tend to do that when people can't support their claims with evidence. That is an additional similarity between the FSM and claims about God.
That is the false premise that the OP explained, hence the creation of a straw man which appears to make a point.
I didn't realize that, how many Spaghetti God followers do you have?
I didn't realize that, how many Spaghetti God followers do you have? Where are the churches? What sociological, cultural impact has the spaghetti God had?
This is not the most constructive way to defend the faith, sir. Use care to avoid logical fallacies when presenting an argument. You've committed a few already:
Appeal to popularity
Appeal to consequence
Appeal to authority
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?