- Apr 30, 2013
- 33,521
- 20,803
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- United Ch. of Christ
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
I didn't say it should disqualify anyone...but you can't have one group founded by 2 openly avowed Marxists, and another 'movement' (like Antifa) that flies the flag of the 1930's German communist movement, and then have them get bent out of shape when that's pointed out.
I've noted this before, but perhaps it's time for there to be a parallel movement that seeks to achieve the same main goal, but doesn't come with all of the baggage.
I've likened it to the difference between PETA and the ASPCA. Both acronyms, expanded, convey a similar message of "don't be cruel to animals", yet the two organizations are quite different in their tactics and side-agendas.
Perhaps it's time for those two ideas/movements to have an "ASPCA" to BLM's/Antifa's "PETA".
The founders of BLM never claimed to be unique authorities, and are not leaders in the usual sense, as Black Lives Matter is not an organization, but a movement. BLM is non-authoritarian and non-hierarchical. As long as you believe black lives matter, that's what's essential. That means that alot of people marching in BLM related protests don't necessarily agree with everything that the founders might have to say, and they don't have to, really. That's not the point of the protests. The point of the protests is black people can't breathe.
Upvote
0