Flood Physics.

[inquiring mind]

Belivers have extrasensory powers?

Nope, He bears witness in our hearts.

 

[lasthero]

How many times has evidence put innocent people in jail?

Not nearly as many times as it’s put guilty people in jail.

There will be endless questions on your part, with no satisfactory answers. Color-blind people can’t determine difference in colors, and the blind cannot see them at all, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there. In the same way unbelievers cannot understand Moses and the prophets, and are blind to the gospel.

‘Evidence doesn’t matter’ is just something that people who don’t have any evidence say.

If you had evidence to support your position, you’d happily present it. But you don’t. In fact, the evidence speaks against it. So your only course of action is to act like the evidence doesn’t really matter.

 

[Subduction Zone]

How many times has evidence put innocent people in jail? There will be endless questions on your part, with no satisfactory answers. Color-blind people can’t determine difference in colors, and the blind cannot see them at all, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there. In the same way unbelievers cannot understand Moses and the prophets, and are blind to the gospel.

Yes, evidence can be wrong at times. But that is the exception and not the rule. That is not a valid objection. When all of the evidence from many independent sources agree we can be very very sure that an idea is correct. When people are unjustly convicted it tends to be quite often based upon the least reliable of legal evidence. Do you know what the least reliable legal evidence is? It tends to be eyewitness testimony.

 

[HitchSlap]

How many times has evidence put innocent people in jail?

Your comment is a non sequitur.

But to answer your question, I'm sure many innocent people were convicted by eyewitness testimony alone. Fortunately, we have thousands of documented cases where science was used to exonerate innocent people as well.

There will be endless questions on your part, with no satisfactory answers. Color-blind people can’t determine difference in colors, and the blind cannot see them at all, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there.

False equivalency fallacy.

It's actually a case of us demonstrating to you colors exist, and how we know they do, and you keep saying there are additional colors that could have existed in the past.

In the same way unbelievers cannot understand Moses and the prophets, and are blind to the gospel.

Bull-puckey. This is the lie you have to convince yourself of to keep your dissonance from ruining a good nights sleep.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nope, He bears witness in our hearts.

That is called confirmation bias. If it was reliable there would not be countless sects of Christianity.

 

[VirOptimus]

Nope, He bears witness in our hearts.

The heart is a muscle that pumps blood. You really shouldnt have alien things in it.

 

[lasthero]

OOPS

 

[Jonathan Mathews]

"The waters prevailed above the mountains, covering them fifteen cubits deep." Genesis 7:20

 

[Subduction Zone]

"The waters prevailed above the mountains, covering them fifteen cubits deep." Genesis 7:20

And we know that did not happen. So how do you interpret that part of the Bible?

 

[Jonathan Mathews]

And we know that did not happen. So how do you interpret that part of the Bible?

That it DID happen.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That it DID happen.

Why do that? It harms your faith.

 

[AV1611VET]

That it DID happen.

Noah's local flood:

 

[Subduction Zone]

Noah's local flood:

Just about as silly as covering Mt. Everest and not leaving a single piece of evidence.

 

[AV1611VET]

Just about as silly as covering Mt. Everest and not leaving a single piece of evidence.

QV please: My Sanitary Challenge

 

[Subduction Zone]

QV please: My Sanitary Challenge

Been there, done that, had a good laugh.

If you want to do a challenge you really should learn how to make a proper one. A proper test has a reasonable possibility of failure if you are wrong. If you can't think of such a scenario then you do not know how to properly test your beliefs.

 

[AV1611VET]

Just about as silly as covering Mt. Everest and not leaving a single piece of evidence.

QV please: My Sanitary Challenge

Been there, done that, had a good laugh.

If you want to do a challenge you really should learn how to make a proper one. A proper test has a reasonable possibility of failure if you are wrong. If you can't think of such a scenario then you do not know how to properly test your beliefs.

Then build your lab (corral) on the top of Mt. Everest.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Then build your lab (corral) on the top of Mt. Everest.

As soon as you start sending those checks.

You see that is an ignorant demand on your part. It demonstrates that you do not know how to test your ideas. It is why your "challenges" always fail.

 

[AV1611VET]

As soon as you start sending those checks.

You see that is an ignorant demand on your part. It demonstrates that you do not know how to test your ideas. It is why your "challenges" always fail.

That's fine.

I'll use that "ignorant demand" to qv those who claim God was deceptive in cleaning up after the Flood.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That's fine.

I'll use that "ignorant demand" to qv those who claim God was deceptive in cleaning up after the Flood.

You are making an error again. No one is claiming that God is deceptive except for you.

 

[AV1611VET]

No one is claiming that God is deceptive except for you.

Because they don't believe God cleaned up His mess and made the Earth livable again?