Sorry, this doesn't work on many levels. The first being that in origin theory, evidence is more in the eye of the beholder than it is "fact." In an experiment, the researcher must have a control to test against. The problem with a theory such as evolution, there is no control, just the idea of what should be the control. This, in turn, inhibits the ability of evolution to be truely testable. This leads to your assumption that evolution is one of the most best supported theories in science. This is a blatant error. Because of the lack of a control among other things, evolution is only supported by hypotheses and theories, something that does not make it well supported. Plus, one can look at the millions of scientific theories out there and see the vast majority to have much harder evidence then evolution. Science has an abundant amount of the theories that have books worth of testable evidence. Look at stem cell research, tumor serveillence theory, theories surrounding the effect of neurotransmitters on different areas of the body, theories of the effect of drugs on human fetuses, and the list goes on and on. Everyone of these theories has so much more support for them than does evolution. Another thing is that a Law is the highest level you can get to.
