I did not show you footage from the stratosphere. I have shown you footage from outer space. Being higher, you can see the Earth's curvature much more clearly.
Yeah, the footage shown was CGI in all videos except the first, and the first one was manipulation using a fish eye lens from the stratosphere.
Then, why does it not turn any of the remaining objects displayed into curves as well? You know, space orbiting equipment, continent design, straight sun rays… There are no such signs of any fish-eyed lens. Again, you are denying plain evidence in front of you.
Wrong. There are fish eye lens, and they usually keep images toward the top of the image in curved form.
Consider this:
Now, consider jump produced by Bruce Baumgartner:
Here an image shows a curve, the result of a fish eye lens:
Here an image shows no curve, considering this camera had no fish eye lens. Note the flat horizon.
Equipment in various videos shows curving as well.
Those images are filmed from a much lower altitude than the footage I showed you. Evidently, from a higher altitude, you can see the Earth's curvature much more clearly. I expected that you would be sufficiently intelligent to understand this.
Really, it doesn't look like it? Baumgartner is said to be in the stratosphere. Look at the flat Baumgartner picture. Notice they are at relatively similar altitudes.
flat Earth image
The space shuttle, featuring a "rounded edge", the result of a fish eye lens, appears to be at only minimal higher altitude to a high altitude balloon. Not enough to make much of a difference in curvature, yet it shows profound difference. By the way, it's obvious that the shuttle is superimposed on this fish eye lens picture, likely taken from a high altitude plane.
You are wrong. Many space missions have gone much higher than that. Yes, they do have them go up about this high.
I know they claim that they have gone farther than that, but the pictures we have don't look much higher. We know the ones taken from the moon missions were faked.
First attempts at faking it. On later "moon missions", they solved the problem with a more rounded window on the top.
Here is them faking a picture, in video.
Look at this obvious CGI of the Earth and the "backside of the moon". The video of it is even more ridiculous.
video:
By the way, how big is America?
What about "sex" being written in the clouds. That cannot happen.
This matches Disney's "sex" in some of its pictures. If you know anything about Disney, Walt Disney worked with Werner Von Braun from NASA, the ex Nazi military man. It shouldn't be surprising you'd see "sex" written in both Disney images and NASA images, considering the connection.
Also look up images if you'd like which shows the male reproductive organ with Mickey and Minnie and the castle in the Little Mermaid. Too vile to be shown here.
Here is Walt Disney with Werner Von Braun
As I've already shown Masonic connections to NASA. Here is the masonic connection to Walt Disney.
Why not? The sun is very, very big. It is 150,000,000 km away, but it is also 1,400,000 km in diameter (the Earth has a diameter of only 12,760 km, and the Moon of 3600 km). The hot spot is there because the sun is massively huge.
You wouldn't have a hot spot on only a small place on Earth. This has been demonstrated in experiments with objects built to scale, relative to the Sun compared to the moon. Rays would remain parallel to one another. The Earth is too far away from the sun to produce a hotspot.
How would they be from the same angle? You have a sphere from which rays come out; from each point of the surface, the rays come out perpendicularly, which means that they all need to have different angles.
Watch this video:
Where does it say that it is a solid structure?
Firmament Definition. (solid)
http://biblehub.com/hebrew/7549.htm
You are wrong. It is real, as many pictures and countless astronaut testimony have demonstrated, as well as the successfulness of many unmanned space mission. There would have to be a massive conspiracy theory going on, one involving way too many people. Think about it. If all pictures and all testimony point to the same thing, is it reasonable for a judge to proclaim it all as false?
The evidence is there that it is fake, from cgi, to sex in clouds, to different size Americas, to faking on a green screen, to "bubbles in space", to faking from plane, to the masonic connection, to the Bible [MOST IMPORTANT]. End of story. It's fake.
Do you really think that if we truly went to the moon, a greater distance, that we would have not gone back since 1972?
It is a massive conspiracy.
If they are launched at a sufficiently great speed to overcome the Earth's gravity, they do.
Gravity is a theory. It is not real. The reason you fall to the Earth has to do with density. Your body is of greater density relative to the air so it sinks.
If gravity were real, you wouldn't have a force supposedly powerful enough to hold water to a curved surface, but not powerful enough to pull a butterfly to Earth.
By the way, flight can reach the stratosphere, but that is only high altitude atmosphere.
There are way too many astronauts and scientists to assume that they are all lying. Some of them are Christians.
NASA is compartmentalized. Only those in the know need to know. Most in NASA have a specific job and it doesn't require them to know about the conspiracy.
Nice job finding guys who look similar to the dead crew! You forgot one man, though.
Many of them are using the same names. Facial recognition software has confirmed that some are the same person.
You can't be that blind.
In that case, it should illuminate the whole Earth.
God is supernatural. He can light which sections he wants to light.
By the way, check out this video which illustrates how the sun curves, corresponding to the movement of the sun around the Earth. Actual footage shows it curving in the correct direction and arc.
Explain night. What on Earth happens at night if the Sun is still up in the sky, on the same side of the Earth?
The sun is not over the same side of the Earth while it is night. Day and night has to do with:
1) The movement of the sun around the Earth, of which its rays extend a defined distance.
2) Our ability to perceive far away objects at the horizon (perspective).
That video does not seem to explain anything. Have you ever watched a sunset on the sea? Have you never noticed that the bottom part of the Sun goes below the horizon, and then the rest of the Sun, until it is all below the horizon and rises in the opposite way, in the opposite side of the Earth, half a day later? How can the Sn go below the horizon if the Earth is flat?
It doesn't go below the curve, it simply moves past our focal point at the horizon and beyond a distance for our ability to see it. This corresponds with the distance light travels.
I am not going to watch that whole 30-minute video. Just tell me: in a solar eclipse, what is it that covers the Sun and, in a lunar eclipse, what is it that casts a round shadow onto the Moon?
It is believed by some that there are dark celestial bodies, as identified in the video.
But how do you have magnetism in a flat Earth? And why can you also see the aurora australis?
Magnetic center and opposite charge toward the edge.
That only works if you keep turning round. What if you walk in a straight line? You still end up in the same place without falling off the edge. How?
Moving west and east runs in a cylindrical direction with respect to the distance from the magnetic "North Pole" over the circular flat Earth.
Coordinates and compasses correct for the cylindrical shape relative to the distance from magnetic North. Thus, it reads as "west" or "east", even though it hasn't gone in a straight line, more noticeable over long distances.
If you were to walk in a real straight line, you would eventually hit Antarctica (granted you'd have to traverse oceans). Antarctica is the land and wall of ice that surrounds the cylindrical flat Earth, holding the oceans in. Therefore, you can't fall off the edge, especially not considering a dome surrounds the Earth.
Consider the Antarctic Treaty which makes voyages to Antarctica by civilians off-limits. This likely has to do because people would discover that the Earth is not round because they'd find the edge.
https://youtu.be/QrGeCbAEtCk
By the way, can you show me the edge of the Earth?
Some believe this is evidence of it.
https://youtu.be/7-9xRQryOvQ
But how can it literally go below the horizon if the surface is not curved
It has to do with perspective. Consider how railroad track rails converge the farther away you go. Consider how long halls are wider by you as opposed to down the hall. It has to do with perspective in which our eyes perceive things converging toward the horizon to a focal point. Videos I've posted illustrate this.
Except that, actually, God's Word says nothing of the sort and all the evidence proves that it is a sphere.
https://youtu.be/vralJa38234
