Castaway:
You stated and I responded:
Unfortunately; it is NEVER a "clear cut message" when individuals such as your self are clearly and decidedly against the Adventist Church official teachings, and using her writings to try and discredit the church and its teachings. It is NEVER a "clear cut message when you whip people with one small quote ripped out of its context, and made to say what you want it to say. As I have been trying to show another poster here; this is a gross misuse of her writings, and she herself has asked/pleaded that we not do this to her writings. If you truly believed in what she writes; you would never misuse her writings out of context like this.
You tell me what of her writings have I misused or taken out of context?
Definition of context: text surrounding word or passage: the words, phrases, or passages that come before and after a particular word or passage in a speech or piece of writing and help to explain its full meaning. Bing Dictionary
Using the word ELOHIM is the actual name that the English writers substituted by using the pagan word god.
Definition for ELOHIM: E·lo·him [ e lṓ hìm ] 1. God: in the Bible, a Hebrew word for God. Bing Dictionary
I capitalize all letters referring to the FATHER, SON and HOLY SPIRIT. I change the word ghost to SPIRIT because HE is not a ghost!
Definition of the word ghost: supposed spirit remaining after death: the supposed spirit of somebody who has died, believed to appear as a shadowy form or to cause sounds, the movement of objects, or a frightening atmosphere in a place. Bing Dictionary
So you are wrong because I have never changed the meaning of any word, sentence, phrase that EGW used. You have calling her a prophet when she said don't! So you think I have "whip" out portions well read TM Chapter Three: THE HOLY SCRIPUTES (subtitles)How to Search the Scriptures p. 105, The Study of the Books of Daniel and the Revelation p. 112. EW: Death Not Eternal Life in Misery p. 218 Find anywhere in these chapters that I change anything that was not consistent? You always accuse me but never provide the evidence of my accusation. You copy the writing I pasted with the ones you paste and the only differences that you will see is what I mention above along with the definitions!
Tying to set yourself before us as someone who is some sort of prophetess and special authority to correct us is the first of your many errors here on this forum.
Castaway, I truly hate to say this but you are lying on me. I have never called myself a prophetess because I have always stated on this forum that the last prophet was John the Revelator! I have stated that I am a messenger as we all should be who hold the truth. I also call myself "repairer of the breach" according to Isa 58:12. It is so sad that people have to provide untruths about someone because they disagree with what you are accepting as Bible doctrine.
What is there to "obey" here? All you are doing is bickering about how you don't think we should use the term "ten" when referring to God's law; even hen I showed you a few posts ago several scriptures which do just what you tell us not to.
There are only three Scriptures that use the word ten with the word Commandments and it was never spoken by YAHWEH ELOHIM, YAHSHUA ELOHIM or the HOLY SPIRIT ELOHIM. So that's bickering about a matter of fact? That is what I wrote because this is a forum to discuss the title about the Holy Appointed Set Times that you started. Does the SDA Church agreed with this fact? No it does not! I am providing a position to all who will like to see for themselves. I have not charge you or anyone to change your position but you have accuse me for speaking freely!
There are 446 more places where she says the same kinds of things regarding the ten commandments; so much for your special knowledge and "research." And what she collectively writes on the subject of God's law is well supported by the Bible. But she never wanted anyone to do like you & another poster here to twist what she writes out of context and make individual quotes by her to be doctrine. She always insisted that her writings be used to point to the Bible; not to criticise it like you are doing.
You can list as many as you want but it does not make it right. Nor once again did it ever come out of the mouth of the ALMIGHTY ONES! Simple! What I will provide for you is EGW own words that you will again accuse me of no matter what she says. But this is for those in the forum who will be able to see the truth from her own writings!
We have many lessons to learn, and many, many to unlearn. ELOHIM and Heaven alone are infallible. Those who think that they will never have to give up a cherished view, never have occasion to change an opinion, will be disappointed. As long as we hold to our own ideas and opinions with determined persistency, we cannot have the unity for which YAHSHUA prayed.--The Review and Herald, July 26, 1892. 1SM p. 37
In regard to infallibility, I never claimed it; ELOHIM alone is infallible. HIS word is true, and in HIM is no variableness, or shadow of turning.--Letter 10, 1895. 1SM p. 37
You think that our Church can do no wrong I disagree. I will continue to speak out on what is wrong with our teachings but will hold fast to the ones we present that are true!
Go in peace with blessings,
stinsonmarri