Archaeopteryx
Wanderer
You've set up a false dichotomy.If intelligence is not created out of random, then how is it created? Do you believe in creation?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You've set up a false dichotomy.If intelligence is not created out of random, then how is it created? Do you believe in creation?
What an asinine remark.Demonstrate and independently verify that facts are demonstrable and independently verifiable.
how so? You don't think intelligence can be created out of random, so how do you think intelligence is formed?You've set up a false dichotomy.
Through natural processes, which aren't necessarily random.how so? You don't think intelligence can be created out of random, so how do you think intelligence is formed?
IF it is a fact that only facts can be demonstrable and independently verifiable, this is not a fact unless you can demonstrate it and independently verify it.What an asinine remark.
So does God damn them then?They neither know their wretchedness nor the majesty of the Lord of Hosts.
What processes were responsible for intelligence?Through natural processes, which aren't necessarily random.
Recommended reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AxiomIF it is a fact that only facts can be demonstrable and independently verifiable, this is not a fact unless you can demonstrate it and independently verify it.
Do you understand the difference between analytic and synthetic statements?IF it is a fact that only facts can be demonstrable and independently verifiable, this is not a fact unless you can demonstrate it and independently verify it.
Evolution. If you would like details, I recommend starting a search on PubMed or Google Scholar.What processes were responsible for intelligence?
Explain to me how this relates to facts needing to be demonstrable and independently verifiable.Recommended reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom
Through natural processes, which aren't necessarily random.
It is axiomatic that facts need to be demonstrable and independently verifable. I fail to see why this needs explanation.Explain to me how this relates to facts needing to be demonstrable and independently verifiable.
Fact: the Golden State Warriors will set a new NBA record for most wins in a season, surpassing the Chicago Bulls, if they beat the Utah Grizzlies tonight.IF it is a fact that only facts can be demonstrable and independently verifiable, this is not a fact unless you can demonstrate it and independently verify it.
As a native Chicago witness of the Bulls dynasty, this disturbs me.Fact: the Golden State Warriors will set a new NBA record for most wins in a season, surpassing the Chicago Bulls, if they beat the Utah Grizzlies tonight.
It is axiomatic that facts need to be demonstrable and independently verifable. I fail to see why this needs explanation.
I've actually hinted at this before, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove.only to a certain degree. What we think is demonstrable and verifiable can only be done within certain limits, i.e. in physics we know we can't measure anything accurately (only to a certain degree) because to measure something, you have to hit it with something (a ray etc), that will move the subject you are trying to measure. And when you get into quantum physics, nothing is for certain, just bunch of probabilities.
How did we attain the truth behind the axiom that a fact need be demonstrable and independently verifiable?It is axiomatic that facts need to be demonstrable and independently verifable. I fail to see why this needs explanation.