Facts To Prove The Theory Of Evolution

[AV1611VET]

One of the thing's I've noticed is that it's mostly scientist who are attacked. There's a little sometimes, but basically we see very few arguments that try to show evolution as false. I see it as attacking the messenger but not the message.

1. Who started that message in the first place?
2. Who's keeping that message going?
3. Who's making that message stronger and stronger?

 

[AV1611VET]

This is how anti-intellectualism works, when you don't have a sound reason of showing why the science is wrong smear the scientist's reputations instead.

They smear their own.

 

[BCP1928]

Yes it didn't self anything, it followed a blueprint from nothing to something.

There is no "blueprint." Evolution is not following a plan to a predetermined target.

 

[NxNW]

What are those forces of nature that gives it ability to create advanced optic?. How can a thoughtless process create such wonders. What force in the ocean caused the mantis shrimp to self develop advanced biotechnology vision. Nothing else in the ocean has such advanced vision. Nothing period anywhere. Maybe an octopus that can see through its skin. Yet another example of blind natural selection choosing to go extreme with life's possibilities without instruction or degree to even select anything.

It's been estimated that a single light sensitive call can evolve into a fully functioning eyeball in 100,000 generations, and has done so dozens of times independently.

 

[NxNW]

I wasn't addressing Berlinski. I already know he's an atheist. He's worth a read though ... even if it's just one.

He wrote a book called A Tour of the Calculus, which is great reading if you're into math. It's just that he likes being contrary where evolution is concerned. I seriously doubt that he has doubts about evolution, but he gets attention and possibly funding by criticizing it. I don't think he's worth taking seriously.

 

[NxNW]

Not in any sense of the reality is science self correcting at all. Money is the major motive (greed), and the mountain of lies produced exceed the federal budget.

None of the above is even remotely true.

 

[NxNW]

Or trickester evolution creating a three hearted animal octopus or another with the most advanced optics known to man. Even he can't even create such optics like a mantis shrimp has. How's that done with no forethought?

The argument from incredulity has no merit.

A lot of times evolution can not explain how such things come about blindly other than intelligent design.

Questions are not evidence. All mysteries are not miracles.

 

[Larniavc]

I never saw anyone say that nylon can eat anything at all ! But if it can, so be it....

Bacteria that eats nylon. This is important because nylon did not exist on Earth until humans invented it. This happened by a frame-shift mutation that completely scrambled existing genetic code that allowed for the manifestation of an entirely new function.

Nylon-eating bacteria - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Were there ever any religious leaders who did not seek to silence or to kill Jesus and/or His followers/disciples ?
Yes, clearly.
Likewise there are some thought to be or have a label scientist, who do seek what is truth, what is right and good , even though they are opposed by the system of this world everyone works in.
Jesus Reveals all this, and is the most important of all in everyone's life, either as their Savior, or their Judge.

I really think you're talking out of you rearend to justify slandering a segment of the population whom you've never met.

 

[AV1611VET]

I really think you're talking out of you rearend to justify slandering a segment of the population whom you've never met.

Like you did here?

POST 47

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Like you did here?

POST 47

Not even remotely the same.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Like you did here?

POST 47

I would call this the same as what you accuse me of:

POST #42

 

[Larniavc]

People did not evolve to eat any fast food.

But they did evolve to eat food. Which fast food is. Your comment is beyond stupid.

 

[AV1611VET]

Not even remotely the same.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

No, it's not even remotely the same at all. I'm sorry your inability to understand English stretches so far, but if you'd like I'd be perfectly willing to break down what I said.

By the by: can this comment from you be considered slanderous too?
"Most modern scientists today are nothing more than myopic, abortion age, goat worshipping (Satanic), urban witches."

 

[AV1611VET]

I would call this the same as what you accuse me of:

POST #42

You herd goats?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You herd goats?

No but you enjoy slandering and libelling scientists when you feel like it and that's a fact, as your many, many, MANY posts show.

 

[AV1611VET]

By the by: can this comment from you be considered slanderous too?
"Most modern scientists today are nothing more than myopic, abortion age, goat worshipping (Satanic), urban witches."

Yes

 

[AV1611VET]

No but you enjoy slandering and libelling scientists when you feel like it and that's a fact, as your many, many, MANY posts show.

Moi???

Why, I wouldn't even think of it!

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes

Moi???

Why, I wouldn't even think of it!

Therefore by your fruits shall we know you...