• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Fabricating Data in Climate Science - The Hijack

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If Earth's temperature stops increasing and an important AGW meeting is coming for nations to pledge monetary funds by the billions, what will fleshly man do?

What a fiasco of corruption that was to impact everyone.

As the whistle-blower first reported to the media:

20170205_133705.jpg


20170205_141510.jpg


20170205_142044.jpg


20170205_142318.jpg


karl-peterson.jpg




Source:
World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
 

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,776
19,959
Michigan
✟897,023.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The right has been saying this forever now, but gets mocked. We're told that 97% of all scientists around the world believe man-made global warming. But there's records in the ice and otherwise that tell us there were times when the carbon levels where much higher than they are today, and the earth was much warmer than it is today. The sun and the earth have cycles.

Of course we're warming. We're coming out of an ice age. According to scientists, it was just 10,000 years ago that where I'm sitting in Michigan right now, there was a glacier two miles high. The ice has been retreating for a long time. It's not a new phenomenon.

A lot of us has known for awhile now that they've been manipulating data to support their cause. None of Al Gore's predictions have come true. They keep changing 'the facts', all driven by a multi-billion dollar industry.
 
Upvote 0

AJTruth

Active Member
Site Supporter
Jan 27, 2017
363
153
winter haven fl
✟22,122.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Climate change, biggest hoax since sasquatch

Used to be called Global Warming. They we're unable to sell this snake oil as Global Warming. So, now it's called climate change. What a joke!



There is no consensus
The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere. Realy? DUH!

A few more progressive lies exposed here:

1970 Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next 10 years.”

1970, Life magazine reported, “Scientists have solid experimental & theoretical evidence to support he following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution & by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half

2006 Al Gore predicted that we had 10 years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.”

2008, Al Gore predicted that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap would be completely melted within 5-7 years

2014 France’s foreign minister said that we only have 500 days to stop “climate chaos.”

Just more proof: The Progressive Fear Message Of Climate Change To Raise $ & Grab Power & Control:

IS THE BIGGEST HOAX SINCE SASQUATCH.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Is the following what they meant by affecting EVERYTHING?

The Effects of Acid Rain on Ecosystems

This figure illustrates the pH level at which key organisms may be lost as their environment becomes more acidic. Not all fish, shellfish, or the insects that they eat can tolerate the same amount of acid.

An ecosystem is a community of plants, animals and other organisms along with their environment including the air, water and soil. Everything in an ecosystem is connected. If something harms one part of an ecosystem – one species of plant or animal, the soil or the water – it can have an impact on everything else.

Effects of Acid Rain on Fish and Wildlife
The ecological effects of acid rain are most clearly seen in aquatic environments, such as streams, lakes, and marshes where it can be harmful to fish and other wildlife. As it flows through the soil, acidic rain water can leach aluminum from soil clay particles and then flow into streams and lakes. The more acid that is introduced to the ecosystem, the more aluminum is released.

Some types of plants and animals are able to tolerate acidic waters and moderate amounts of aluminum. Others, however, are acid-sensitive and will be lost as the pH declines. Generally, the young of most species are more sensitive to environmental conditions than adults. At pH 5, most fish eggs cannot hatch. At lower pH levels, some adult fish die. Some acidic lakes have no fish. Even if a species of fish or animal can tolerate moderately acidic water, the animals or plants it eats might not. For example, frogs have a critical pH around 4, but the mayflies they eat are more sensitive and may not survive pH below 5.5.

Effects of Acid Rain on Plants and Trees
Dead or dying trees are a common sight in areas effected by acid rain. Acid rain leaches aluminum from the soil. That aluminum may be harmful to plants as well as animals. Acid rain also removes minerals and nutrients from the soil that trees need to grow.

At high elevations, acidic fog and clouds might strip nutrients from trees’ foliage, leaving them with brown or dead leaves and needles. The trees are then less able to absorb sunlight, which makes them weak and less able to withstand freezing temperatures.

Buffering Capacity
Many forests, streams, and lakes that experience acid rain don’t suffer effects because the soil in those areas can buffer the acid rain by neutralizing the acidity in the rainwater flowing through it. This capacity depends on the thickness and composition of the soil and the type of bedrock underneath it. In areas such as mountainous parts of the Northeast United States, the soil is thin and lacks the ability to adequately neutralize the acid in the rain water. As a result, these areas are particularly vulnerable and the acid and aluminum can accumulate in the soil, streams, or lakes.

Episodic Acidification
Melting snow and heavy rain downpours can result in what is known as episodic acidification. Lakes that do not normally have a high level of acidity may temporarily experience effects of acid rain when the melting snow or downpour brings greater amounts of acidic deposition and the soil can’t buffer it. This short duration of higher acidity (i.e., lower pH) can result in a short-term stress on the ecosystem where a variety of organisms or species may be injured or killed.

Nitrogen Pollution
It’s not just the acidity of acid rain that can cause problems. Acid rain also contains nitrogen, and this can have an impact on some ecosystems. For example, nitrogen pollution in our coastal waters is partially responsible for declining fish and shellfish populations in some areas. In addition to agriculture and wastewater, much of the nitrogen produced by human activity that reaches coastal waters comes from the atmosphere.

fishkillgraphic2.png

This figure illustrates the pH level at which key organisms may be lost as their environment becomes more acidic. Not all fish, shellfish, or the insects that they eat can tolerate the same amount of acid.


Effects of Acid Rain | Acid Rain | US EPA
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

Abraxos

Christ is King
Jan 12, 2016
1,142
620
125
New Zealand
✟87,412.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Climate change occurs all the time, the problem is that some scientists are amounting these changes are because of man.

It gets weirder when they say that climate change is the cause for terrorism.

ROOLERd.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Climate change occurs all the time, the problem is that some scientists are amounting these changes are because of man.

It gets weirder when they say that climate change is the cause for terrorism.

ROOLERd.jpg

Sounds like the excuse used by this lawyer in defense of his clients who had murdered a female senior citizen:
"They were eating chocolate and it affected their judgment!" How the heck can ramming a plane into the Twin Towers be attributed to climate change?
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,776
19,959
Michigan
✟897,023.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Is the following what they meant by affecting EVERYTHING?
That plus the many shows, cartoons (Captain Planet anybody?), textbooks, and pictures where marble statues are melting and eroding away, national landmarks like the Colosseum being destroyed by acid rain. Today I don't hear about it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aryeh
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
  • Agree
Reactions: Aryeh
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
That plus the many shows, cartoons (Captain Planet anybody?), textbooks, and pictures where marble statues are melting and eroding away, national landmarks like the Colosseum being destroyed by acid rain. Today I don't hear about it at all.
I had heard of acid rain and dismissed it as irrelevant to me personally until a few drops fell into my eyes and they began to burn. As a kid I had let rain pour unto my face with a refreshing effect on my eyes. But this time it was a veritable acid attack. Since that incident I avoid getting the nasty liquid near my eyes for fear of of the pain and possible permanent damage. Not saying it is like that all over the world since my South African girlfriend claimed that she has no such trouble. But here in the USA on the East Coast that has been my experience.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,776
19,959
Michigan
✟897,023.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I had heard of acid rain and dismissed it as irrelevant to me personally until a few drops fell into my eyes and they began to burn. As a kid I had let rain pour unto my face with a refreshing effect on my eyes. But this time it was a veritable acid attack. Since that incident I avoid getting the nasty liquid near my eyes for fear of of the pain and possible permanent damage. Not saying it is like that all over the world since my South African girlfriend claimed that she has no such trouble. But here in the USA on the East Coast that has been my experience.
I am sorry that happened to you. I hope my post didn't offend you, as I wasn't denying acid rain existed. I'm just saying the way it was portrayed made it seem like we would all melt and our civilization would die due to it. I'm certain areas of the world, like the east coast, China, Japan, Los Angeles, etc, do suffer numerous effects from heavily pollution, health included. But is it warming the earth? I'm not so sure. It COULD be. We should still pursue improving technology to clean and prevent pollution as best as we can.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
These threads are my favourite on CF. Nothing new under the sun. It starts with a conspiracy theory post; then a parade of people making sarcastic comments and whinging about how "the right has been saying this for years". Nobody contributing anything new. Nobody questioning the fact that probably the most disreputable English language newspaper in the entire world is the ONLY newspaper reporting it, nor caring about that matter.

And then at some point, someone who can actually address what is being discussed will post. Then nobody will have anything to say and will forget the 100 other times similar arguments were put forward and .
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Climate change, biggest hoax since sasquatch

Oh this should be good...

Used to be called Global Warming. They we're unable to sell this snake oil as Global Warming. So, now it's called climate change. What a joke!

Oh the irony. Whenever I see someone repeat this myth I know we can expect some Dunning-Kruger to follow.
What's the difference between global warming and climate change? | NOAA Climate.gov
>> Global warming refers only to the Earth’s rising surface temperature, while climate change includes warming and the “side effects” of warming—like melting glaciers, heavier rainstorms, or more frequent drought. Said another way, global warming is one symptom of the much larger problem of human-caused climate change. <<

The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists...

Bahahahah! The Oregon Petition is a joke.
>> Approved names on the list included fictional characters from the television show M*A*S*H,[21] the movie Star Wars,[20] Spice Girls group member Geri Halliwell, English naturalist Charles Darwin (d. 1882) and prank names such as "I. C. Ewe".[22] When questioned about the pop singer during a telephone interview with Joseph Hubert of the Associated Press, Robinson acknowledged that her endorsement and degree in microbiology was inauthentic, remarking "When we're getting thousands of signatures there's no way of filtering out a fake". <<

1970 Biologist Paul Ehrlich

The Population Bomb has nothing to do with climate science.

1970, Life magazine

Popular press magazines are not scientific literature.

2006 Al Gore predicted that we had 10 years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.”

^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ Wow, just wow. How ironic that your list of supposed "progressive lies" includes a lie itself. Vice President Gore said no such thing. This supposed quote was from Seinfeld creator Larry David. ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

2008, Al Gore

Vice President Gore is not a climate scientist.

2014 France’s foreign minister

Laurent Fabius is not a climate scientist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Climate change occurs all the time, the problem is that some scientists are amounting these changes are because of man.

Climate change does occur all the time. Just not at the pace observed over the last 50 years. And you meant "attributed" and they are correct. There aren't any other factors that are attributable to the recent warming other than human emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere.

It gets weirder when they say that climate change is the cause for terrorism.

"They" so no such thing. What some have observed is that climate disruption in countries which have been a source for terrorism could lead to more terrorism.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Man you're condescending. Do you want to teach and be respectful of things people don't know? Or are you going to pretend like you're the greatest person ever and know it all?
condescending? Did you not read the first few posts in this thread?
I am not kidding when i say this is the pattern of about 80% of AGW threads that get posted. If what i say comes across as condescending, it is doing nothing but describing the historical behaviour patterns of agw skeptics on this forum.

Yes. Im a know it all because i didnt believe the daily mail.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2016
825
366
Los Angeles
✟36,820.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
It is deplorable for scientists at the highest level to falsify data. And their intent was to effect the minds and lives of many. They were scientific manipulators.


View attachment 189378

View attachment 189380



Source:
World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online

I am in mathematic academia, so I have a marginal amount of freedom to speak about AGW as I want to without too much worry of academic and professional retribution.

I said on another post - in detail- how any model trying to use a millionth of a percent of the data available in a DYNAMICAL system begins categorically flawed.

From there, it is simply a matter of "fitting."


The backlash I got let's me know many civilians are just believing academics, and have not actually studied the fundamentals (besides what has been told to them.) This isn't an insult to the people; on the contrary, the lack of transparency in the scientific community is appaling.

The purpose of a STAYED discovery is to be able to present your data and results to another person in such a way that s/he can follow every step you took, and reproduce the same results.

That is science. But, since science has elevated itself with exclusivity through knowledge and resources, the layperson is left to rely on HUMANS if the layperson does not study for his or herself.

It is appalling all around. AGW is clearly a political agenda, but the scare tactics put in educational programming has made people "certain" of our demise - and certain it is BECAUSE of humans (as opposed to a brown dwarf star, radiation shower, or natural periodic changes.)

I also find it appalling that "consensus" has constituted truth - as in, "97% of the scientists all agree..."

Consensus is one of the worst measuring parameters for reality. Even, and especially in science.

If consensus ruled, we would still believe germs were small demonic entities. If it wasn't for academic and public incredulity, a man wouldn't have had to inject a petri dish of bacteria to PROVE to academics that ulcers are caused by H. Pylori.

If consensus ruled, anyone darker than a manilla folder would still be considered animals - as it was the CONSENSUS in academia at one point.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I am in mathematic academia, so I have a marginal amount of freedom to speak about AGW as I want to without too much worry of academic and professional retribution.

I said on another post - in detail- how any model trying to use a millionth of a percent of the data available in a DYNAMICAL system begins categorically flawed.

From there, it is simply a matter of "fitting."


The backlash I got let's me know many civilians are just believing academics, and have not actually studied the fundamentals (besides what has been told to them.) This isn't an insult to the people; on the contrary, the lack of transparency in the scientific community is appaling.

The purpose of a STAYED discovery is to be able to present your data and results to another person in such a way that s/he can follow every step you took, and reproduce the same results.

That is science. But, since science has elevated itself with exclusivity through knowledge and resources, the layperson is left to rely on HUMANS if the layperson does not study for his or herself.

It is appalling all around. AGW is clearly a political agenda, but the scare tactics put in educational programming has made people "certain" of our demise - and certain it is BECAUSE of humans (as opposed to a brown dwarf star, radiation shower, or natural periodic changes.)

I also find it appalling that "consensus" has constituted truth - as in, "97% of the scientists all agree..."

Consensus is one of the worst measuring parameters for reality. Even, and especially in science.

If consensus ruled, we would still believe germs were small demonic entities. If it wasn't for academic and public incredulity, a man wouldn't have had to inject a petri dish of bacteria to PROVE to academics that ulcers are caused by H. Pylori.

If consensus ruled, anyone darker than a manilla folder would still be considered animals - as it was the CONSENSUS in academia at one point.
While i understand your point, im not sure that an entire field of study and its outcomes can be simply dismissed so out of hand.
As for consensus (and your strange examples), was it empirically valid and tested that dark people are animals or was it fear based propaganda from a group that wielded extreme social power? What kind of data analysis was done to support the theory that germs were little demons. I would literally love to read that paper!
 
Upvote 0