• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ex-Con Hovind released from the pokey.

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeEnders

Newbie
Oct 8, 2009
655
116
✟1,443.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
I can't for the life of me understand this fixation on Kent Hovind.

The answer is pretty obvious if you pick up the right newspaper. its a distraction from the many instances of fraud in the ahem "acceptable" science community

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-systematic-scheme-may-affect-other-journals/

Meanwhile, the Committee on Publication Ethics, a multidisciplinary group that includes more than 9,000 journal editors, issued a statement suggesting a much broader potential problem. The committee, it said, “has become aware of systematic, inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review processes of several journals across different publishers.” Those journals are now reviewing manuscripts to determine how many may need to be retracted, it said.

Ouch!!! looking like it will end up in the hundreds or thousands of examples of fraud in the ahem REAL science community.

P.S. No Hovind defender here just answering the reason why theres a fixation on him rather than all the fraud in the science community
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟236,977.00
Faith
Seeker
The answer is pretty obvious if you pick up the right newspaper. its a distraction from the many instances of fraud in the ahem "acceptable" science community

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-systematic-scheme-may-affect-other-journals/



Ouch!!! looking like it will end up in the hundreds or thousands of examples of fraud in the ahem REAL science community.

P.S. No Hovind defender here just answering the reason why theres a fixation on him rather than all the fraud in the science community

Yes, you got us. We're talking about Hovind now, to distract people from news.

News that happened five months ago.
 
Upvote 0

MikeEnders

Newbie
Oct 8, 2009
655
116
✟1,443.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Upvote 0

Jan Volkes

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2015
1,302
231
45
UK
✟2,674.00
Gender
Female
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Forget the devil old Kent is about to make more money than he ever dreamed possible, Kent has been released to prey on a more than gullible group, he's been told he can take them for as much as he like's just as long as he pays his taxes, the rubes will be fighting to give him their money, the price of his lies will go through the roof and he's primed to get as much as he can.

All Americans should be rooting for Kent because looking from outside of the US he is the epitome of what it means to be American, find gullible people and take them for every penny they have, that's free enterprise, good luck Kent go clean them out,
if they are so blind that they can not see you are telling them lies they deserved all they get and so do you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MikeEnders

Newbie
Oct 8, 2009
655
116
✟1,443.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
If you think the peer review thing is a big deal, start a topic on it.

Maybe I will maybe I won't - won't change my posts in this thread

Questions and discussions will arise out of any and every thread and answers will come as well - Some that you will not like. So you will just have to live with it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,598
52,508
Guam
✟5,127,487.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Forget the devil old Kent is about to make more money than he ever dreamed possible, the rubes will be fighting to give him their money, the price of his lies will go through the roof and he will make sure that it happens.
Sounds to me like you guys are just plain jealous.

You don't like our beliefs being reduced to print and sold for profit, do you?
All Americans should be rooting for Kent because looking from outside of the US he is the epitome of what it means to be American, find gullible people and take them for every penny they have, that's free enterprise good luck Kent.
Yes, and here's how the world saw you guys, when you mandated your profits:

 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,598
52,508
Guam
✟5,127,487.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not aware of Kent printing anything. Aside from a really bad dissertation.
He wrote & co-wrote:
  1. Creation Seminar Notebook
  2. Postulating Christ: The Evolutionary Default
  3. In the Garden of Eden (The Adventures of Danny the Dinosaur, Book 1)
  4. Are You Being Braiwashed? Propaganda in Science Textbooks
 
Upvote 0

Jan Volkes

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2015
1,302
231
45
UK
✟2,674.00
Gender
Female
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Yes, and here's how the world saw you guys, when you mandated your profits:
Which is to say nothing of how the world saw them when they lost most of a continent who they now end up following rather than leading.
These are classic cases of deflection, when someone is unable to answer a charge against them, similar to: you're fat, they answer with: yes but I'm not as fat as he/she is, creationists do this as a matter of course, when they are asked questions they can not answer they ask a question, when charged with doing something they react by pointing at something else, children do it when accused of doing something wrong they point at others and say they were not as bad as they were.
The only ones who do not see this is creationists, they do not even see it when other creationists do it,
is it just another mental block to go with all the others?
 
Upvote 0

MikeEnders

Newbie
Oct 8, 2009
655
116
✟1,443.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
These are classic cases of deflection, when someone is unable to answer a charge against them, similar to: you're fat, they answer with: yes but I'm not as fat as he/she is, creationists

I don't know nor do I care what nonsense you are going on about but the only one deflecting is you from this nonsense pure flame bait you made at Americans

All Americans should be rooting for Kent because looking from outside of the US he is the epitome of what it means to be American

You were not even aiming your vitriol at creationist but "all americans". I could just as well say "follow us because from the outside looking on at the British isles following us is what it means these days to be British." ;)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,598
52,508
Guam
✟5,127,487.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
These are classic cases of deflection, when someone is unable to answer a charge against them, similar to: you're fat, they answer with: yes but I'm not as fat as he/she is, creationists do this as a matter of course, when they are asked questions they can not answer they ask a question, when charged with doing something they react by pointing at something else, children do it when accused of doing something wrong they point at others and say they were not as bad as they were.
The only ones who do not see this is creationists, they do not even see it when other creationists do it,
is it just another mental block to go with all the others?
Is there a question about creationism you'd like me to answer?

It won't be to your satisfaction, of course, but it'll give you something to trample.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.