The reason is that he's a very easy target. Anybody who is on the fence of evolution can see he's a fraud (the mammoth example is an unambiguous one), so evolutionists pick on him because creationists defend him, and in defending him, the credibility of creationism is hurt.
When Aron-Ra used to post here, he put up a challenge asking for a single example of a creationist who claimed to have scientific evidence that didn't lie about that same scientific evidence. No one was ever able to come up with a single example.
Upvote
0