I think you are totally right on this.Design is the third rail of evolutionary biology.
Keep the entertainment flowing, knock yourself out.
I think you are totally right on this.
It's obvious, clearly understood by experts and makes the other two rails useful.
That's what you were trying to say, right?
Without the third rail the other two are useless.
I'm really not following what you are trying to get across with this analogy.Without the third rail the other two are useless.
I'm really not following what you are trying to get across with this analogy.
Because it seems to be that you area implying that evolution is foundational to the modern study of biology... which, while true, is very unlike your usual attitude.
The third rail is belief/creation/design. With it comes the moral imperative to "dress and keep" the environment. Without it science has brought the environment to the brink of destruction (all the while cleverly decrying the very destruction it has wrought).
It is so precious how someone that has all but admitted ignorance in a subject nevertheless feels compelled to pontificate on it.No real need to discuss something that is as obvious as design in anatomy. Take the eye for instance. The way I see it (pun intended) is that the only question is...who or what designed it.
I have read some Gray's and conclude that design is demonstrated by function.
Shame you are ignorant of both, yet unable to understand your shortcomings. The Dunning-Kruger effect, I think it is called. For example, evolutionary biology has nothing to do with understanding the basic functions of neurons and the nervous system, yet you face-planted on that issue pretty majorly a while back. It seems to be more common than average among creationists with engineering-related backgrounds.Biology is one thing. Evolutionary biology is another.
Except... it hasn't really. Politics and money has been the leading cause for the environment being wrecked, not science.
Do you have any other unfalsifiable opinions?
It is so precious how someone that has all but admitted ignorance in a subject nevertheless feels compelled to pontificate on it.
Shame you are ignorant of both, yet unable to understand your shortcomings. The Dunning-Kruger effect, I think it is called. For example, evolutionary biology has nothing to do with understanding the basic functions of neurons and the nervous system, yet you face-planted on that issue pretty majorly a while back. It seems to be more common than average among creationists with engineering-related backgrounds.
Science has provided the wrecking ball.
And yet you repeatedly refuse to admit error, and continually imply that you mere (refuted) opinions are correct.I admit that I'm a person of low ability. What more do you want?
No, they didn't. Science provided the industry. Corporations, politicians and green turned it into a wrecking ball.
Science is a neutral entity.