Evolution is a Lie

[rjc34]

so cats aren't a kind?

According to Kent Hovind we believe cats came from dogs. Didn't you know that?

 

[JustMeSee]

According to Kent Hovind we believe cats came from dogs. Didn't you know that?

If Hovind said it, it must be true.

 

[rjc34]

If Hovind said it, it must be true.

A PhD in 'Christian Education' from a non-accredited diploma mill. Apparently they charge 'by the month', and his dissertation was rife with spelling and grammar mistakes.


Yep, sounds like a reliable source.

 

[JustMeSee]

A PhD in 'Christian Education' from a non-accredited diploma mill. Apparently they charge 'by the month', and his dissertation was rife with spelling and grammar mistakes.


Yep, sounds like a reliable source.

I figured that I didn't need to respond with an emoticon. I am fighting the urge to post a video.

 

[rjc34]

I figured that I didn't need to respond with an emoticon. I am fighting the urge to post a video.

It's a troll thread anyway, post away!

 

[Greg1234]

It's ironic that those who proudly proclaim to live by their faith and not their senses are the ones that demand the highest degree of evidence and certainty.

The creation of of man descends from texts and overlaps into physical science within which the employment of Intelligent Design is sought.

 

[rjc34]

The creation of of man descends from texts and overlaps into physical science within which the employment of Intelligent Design is sought.

Simplified: we have our conclusion and refuse under any circumstances to acknowledge the validity of a claim that would falsify our already decided upon conclusion.

 

[Delphiki]

This:

The creation of of man descends from texts and overlaps into physical science within which the employment of Intelligent Design is sought.

Really just says:

The creation story is in the bible, and it is science.

 

[Hespera]

Well other than the fact you made up the math (which shows ~80 average) you've also got to compare it to a similar group of individuals of modern times. I think upper-class thinkers who don't smoke, drink very little and are known to have been good thinkers would be a fair comparison.



So while the average age at the time was about 30, various factors made it so the greeks had an average age of about 45. Now that is a number much more comparable to todays societies.

Be nice now, if he didnt have half true, or untrue, he'd have no truth at all.

 

[Greg1234]

Really just says:

No it doesn't. There are multiple fields involved and also directional discrepancies which are taken into consideration. You can leave the sentence as it is and rile, but don't change it. If you do, then "I" didn't say it.

 

[DrkSdBls]

The creation of of man descends from texts and overlaps into physical science within which the employment of Intelligent Design is sought.

Sounds like you're saying we were created from the bible, which which would mean we're. Words of fiction ourselves......

Actually, I'd buy that. Recently, I've been questioning whether or not this world is as real as I've been led to believe.

 

[BowTied]

Consider evolution the modern-day Tower of Babel. Remember how God confounded man and his language? Who's to say He hasn't done likewise to man with regard to his scientific "knowledge" and arrogance?

 

[JustMeSee]

Consider evolution the modern-day Tower of Babel. Remember how God confounded man and his language? Who's to say He hasn't done likewise to man with regard to his scientific "knowledge" and arrogance?

Please expound upon this point.

Are you suggesting that God has toppled the tower of science, and ToE is one of the 'languages' that no other field understands?

That is probably wrong on my part. Please explain, BowTied.

 

[Hespera]

Consider evolution the modern-day Tower of Babel. Remember how God confounded man and his language? Who's to say He hasn't done likewise to man with regard to his scientific "knowledge" and arrogance?

I dont get it either. Prease exprain.

 

[Tomatoman]

No it doesn't. There are multiple fields involved and also directional discrepancies which are taken into consideration. You can leave the sentence as it is and rile, but don't change it. If you do, then "I" didn't say it.

No one is riled. I'm just pondering the garbled nature of your posts which seems to be the result of extreme mental confusion.

 

[JustMeSee]

I dont get it either. Please explain.

He created a new thread on the topic.

 

[Hespera]

This same thing is now posted in three places. There is a whiff of troll in the air.

 

[Greg1234]

Sounds like you're saying we were created from the bible, which which would mean we're. Words of fiction ourselves......

Actually, I'd buy that. Recently, I've been questioning whether or not this world is as real as I've been led to believe.

Fortunately, your understanding of texts and metaphysics does not come into play. The property of intelligence is not isolated to metaphysics but overlaps into the physical and from there you reference it for understanding. You also have physical man which can be detected through physical means. Through physical science you have Intelligent Design. The stage is set- all this just for you. You are asked to provide evidence for the purely naturalistic unintelligent origination of man.

 

[Delphiki]

Fortunately, your understanding of texts and metaphysics ...

There is no understanding of metaphysics. The observable fact that most people who believe in metaphysics can't agree on anything regarding the subject is evidence of that.

 

[Greg1234]

There is no understanding of metaphysics. The observable fact that most people who believe in metaphysics can't agree on anything regarding the subject is evidence of that.

Fortunately, your understanding of texts and metaphysics does not come into play. The property of intelligence is not isolated to metaphysics but overlaps into the physical and from there you reference it for understanding. You also have physical man which can be detected through physical means. Through physical science you have Intelligent Design. The stage is set- all this just for you. You are asked to provide evidence for the purely naturalistic unintelligent origination of man.