Evolution is a Lie

[AV1611VET]

If many fossils were found were they shouldn't be, then yes it does. If it is ONE fossil, then no it does not. Haven't we gone over this already? When does it become a falsehood, instead of a misunderstanding on your part?

Whether it's one -- or the whole Precambrian layer is riddled with rabbits, I'm sure an explanation would be forthcoming; and said explanation would certainly not be that evolution has been falsified.

As I have said before -- in my [right to have an] opinion -- I would guess that they would probably claim the layer isn't really Precambrian.

Evolution is not going to be falsified in this dispensation.

 

[Hespera]

If many fossils were found were they shouldn't be, then yes it does. If it is ONE fossil, then no it does not. Haven't we gone over this already? When does it become a falsehood, instead of a misunderstanding on your part?

id be satisfied with half a triassic cow.

or a devonian duck

 

[Anon287]

Evolution is a theory as much as gravity is a theory.

There are still apes because we did not descend from modern apes, rather modern humans and modern apes share a common ancestor. It is likely that this ancestor looked more like an ape than a human and that groups of this ancestor split off and were separated - one group evolved into modern apes and one group evolved into modern humans.

One species does not give birth to another; to claim this shows a misunderstanding of how evolution works. It is a gradual process that has happened over an unimaginable amount of time with each new born organism looking similar to its parent.

One species may turn into another as groups of this species can be separated and each group can two different evolutionary paths due to differing environmental factors, for example. If the two groups ever met again, they would be too genetically different due to the adaptations and genetic mutations to be called the same species.

 

[dad]

Evolution is a theory as much as gravity is a theory.

There are still apes because we did not descend from modern apes, rather modern humans and modern apes share a common ancestor. It is likely that this ancestor looked more like an ape than a human and that groups of this ancestor split off and were separated - one group evolved into modern apes and one group evolved into modern humans.

One species does not give birth to another; to claim this shows a misunderstanding of how evolution works. It is a gradual process that has happened over an unimaginable amount of time with each new born organism looking similar to its parent.

One species may turn into another as groups of this species can be separated and each group can two different evolutionary paths due to differing environmental factors, for example. If the two groups ever met again, they would be too genetically different due to the adaptations and genetic mutations to be called the same species.

Evolution in that sense is a baseless lie then. The only merit it has is in the fact that God equipped us creatures to be able to adapt and evolve. Imagining that one kind evolved from another is pure myth.

 

[Anon287]

Evolution in that sense is a baseless lie then. The only merit it has is in the fact that God equipped us creatures to be able to adapt and evolve. Imagining that one kind evolved from another is pure myth.

No, it is not a baseless lie. There is evidence for all of this.

You said that 'God equipped us creatures to be able to adapt and evolve.' I'm not debating whether evolution was started by God or not, simply that evolution itself exists.

 

[Hespera]

You are better off letting it go, like an abandoned old scow down the river.
There is no salvage, no return.

 

[Research1]

Evolution is a theory as much as gravity is a theory.

There are still apes because we did not descend from modern apes, rather modern humans and modern apes share a common ancestor. It is likely that this ancestor looked more like an ape than a human and that groups of this ancestor split off and were separated - one group evolved into modern apes and one group evolved into modern humans.

One species does not give birth to another; to claim this shows a misunderstanding of how evolution works. It is a gradual process that has happened over an unimaginable amount of time with each new born organism looking similar to its parent.

One species may turn into another as groups of this species can be separated and each group can two different evolutionary paths due to differing environmental factors, for example. If the two groups ever met again, they would be too genetically different due to the adaptations and genetic mutations to be called the same species.

''may'' ''could have'' ''likely'' ''probably'' ''if''...

That's all you evolutionists have. Nothing conclusive, nothing factual...all mere guesses or assumptions.

 

[Research1]

You said that 'God equipped us creatures to be able to adapt and evolve.' I'm not debating whether evolution was started by God or not, simply that evolution itself exists.

There is no evidence for evolution. If you think there is feel free to post it. So far the evolutionists have failed, as all they do is spam wikipedia links.

 

[Tomatoman]

There is no evidence for evolution.

This statement is stupid and false. Repeating it over and over again doesn't make it less stupid or less false, but it does make you look more stupid and more mendacious.

If you think there is feel free to post it.

Lots of posts have pointed you towards the mountains of evidence. You have ignored all of them.

So far the evolutionists have failed, as all they do is spam wikipedia links.

There is so much evidence that is impossible to cover it without linking to external resources. That you have only noticed the wikipedia links shows that you have not bothered to look.


Why are you so scared of looking at the evidence? You must have a very deeply rooted fear of the implications of evolution to maintain this level of denial.

 

[badtim]

''may'' ''could have'' ''likely'' ''probably'' ''if''...

That's all you evolutionists have. Nothing conclusive, nothing factual...all mere guesses or assumptions.

scientific thought is always framed in terms of probability. that's being honest and accurate, unlike the junk that gets spewed out of places like ICR, where they have to make lists repudiating their own previous claims, due to the repeated trouncing they get.

you want facts? compare human life expectancy before and after the age of reason. looks like all that faith healing and prayer didn't work so well, ever.

 

[BowTied]

why so many are using animated avatars, better images can be instantly more familiar more familiar

Avatars? No idea why they're so prevalent. I'm happy with my picture in my natural state.

 

[Research1]

compare human life expectancy before and after the age of reason. looks like all that faith healing and prayer didn't work so well, ever.

The average age of the ancient greek philosophers was 90.

The modern life expectancy in the west is 76 - 82.

 

[MoonLancer]

The average age of the ancient greek philosophers was 90.

The modern life expectancy in the west is 76 - 82.

where are your sources for this 90 number

 

[Koizito]

where are your sources for this 90 number

God told him, perhaps?

 

[DrkSdBls]

Despite all of the grief that AV causes and receives, I get a sense that there are many people who like to have him around. He knows considerable more about the claims of ToE than the average joe who comes in with the same old arguments.

Honestly, I'm bored with him. He never gives us anything new and he's failed every challenge put forward to give us even one shred of creditability of his Hypothesis yet he keeps coming back again and again as if he was never shot down in flames to begin with, which he was countless times.

AV can take a hike.

 

[badtim]

The average age of the ancient greek philosophers was 90.

The modern life expectancy in the west is 76 - 82.

yes, in fantasyland.

 

[AV1611VET]

He never gives us anything new...

Praise the LORD for that!

Just think what would happen if I changed my story every time, eh?

 

[rjc34]

The average age of the ancient greek philosophers was 90.

So when I actually go look it up and find that even the most virile ones only made it to 60? What now?

 

[sandwiches]

''may'' ''could have'' ''likely'' ''probably'' ''if''...

That's all you evolutionists have. Nothing conclusive, nothing factual...all mere guesses or assumptions.

It's ironic that those who proudly proclaim to live by their faith and not their senses are the ones that demand the highest degree of evidence and certainty.

 

[Hespera]

So when I actually go look it up and find that even the most virile ones only made it to 60? What now?

What now? Perhaps observing it is long past time to examine what the bible says about speaking the truth, bearing false witness and so forth.

Even examining one's own conscience can be productive, for those who have one.