- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,603
- 52,510
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Nevertheless, 'Henry M. Morris' is an effective answer to the question.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nevertheless, 'Henry M. Morris' is an effective answer to the question.Right. Morris is the guy that gave that great and well established scientific theory that the craters on the moon were caused during a war between Satan and the armies of the archangel Michael. A fine example of a creation science for sure.
Nevertheless, 'Henry M. Morris' is an effective answer to the question.
Whatever -- the question was asked, the question was answered.Far more effective as an example at seeing just how far "Creation Science" has sunk into the mud over the years.
Whatever -- the question was asked, the question was answered.
You mean like [the late] Henry M. Morris?
Would that really matter?
You guys would just pull out that Steve's list argument -- or whatever it is.
No, it was not. The point was not to "name a modern scientist who is a Creationist". Those people exist. It was to "name a modern scientist who has made large and respected contributions to science who is a Creationist". Because the whole point of that list of famous scientists was to pin Creationism onto brilliant minds. Because it has been shown that those scientists didn't have an option to look at the modern theory of evolution, calling them "Creationists" does not put any feathers in the cap of Creationism.
Wow. I'd rate that pretty low on the 'effective' scale then.Nevertheless, 'Henry M. Morris' is an effective answer to the question.
Link please? or are you on the Arab phone?No, it was not. The point was not to "name a modern scientist who is a Creationist". Those people exist. It was to "name a modern scientist who has made large and respected contributions to science who is a Creationist".
Except it's not about degrees, is it?Wow. I'd rate that pretty low on the 'effective' scale then.
Whatever -- the question was asked, the question was answered.
Except it's not about degrees, is it?
The answer is binary -- either 1 or 0.
Except it's not about degrees, is it?
The answer is binary -- either 1 or 0.
Link please? or are you on the Arab phone?
For a creationist I suppose not.Except it's not about degrees, is it?
The answer is binary -- either 1 or 0.
Nor do you: 1
And the quality of the answer doesn't bother you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?