Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do polls provide us with the truth?I could demonstrate my point with a poll, can you yours?
Millions of Christians would disagree with you, but congratulations on effectively dodging all of my questions. I'll list them here for you if you ever feel a stroke of honesty coming on:Its very first page pwns evolution and atheism both.
Its very first page pwns evolution and atheism both.
On The Origin Of Species by means of natural selection - Google books
Care to show us where? Are you implying the first page of the preface? Or the first page of the first chapter?
I'm going to say you have no read the entire book. And even if you pointed out something, it would end up being just a quote mine, the lowliest of creationist tactics. I'd hope you won't lower yourself to that AV.
I think he meant the first page of his book.
Does science?Do polls provide us with the truth?
We've had that brought to our attention many times -- thus the King James Only Movement was born.Right, my bad. Has anyone told him about the history of this whole biblical inerrancy movement and how it's only about a century old?
Does science?
We've had that brought to our attention many times -- thus the King James Only Movement was born.
The harder we're pushed, the harder we push back.
Do polls provide us with the truth?
non sequitur.
Nope -- did you think I was kidding when I referenced:AV made a claim about angels, but did not provide even the slightest bit of evidence to even show they existed.
Until then all we have is unevidenced claims.Nope -- did you think I was kidding when I referenced:
Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
When you guys can build a machine that can do this:
2 Kings 6:17 And Elisha prayed, and said, LORD, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.
... then you'll have your scientific evidence.
Nope -- did you think I was kidding when I referenced:
Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
When you guys can build a machine that can do this:
2 Kings 6:17 And Elisha prayed, and said, LORD, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.
... then you'll have your scientific evidence.
Well, I'd hoped you were kidding. You were asked to provide an angel for analysis, and you instead produced a verse suggesting that angels walk among us, sometimes disguised as bums.Nope -- did you think I was kidding when I referenced:
Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
How, exactly, would synthesizing LSD serve as evidence of angels? Please only use that verse when it is relevant, AV. Meanwhile, either provide an operational definition of "angel" or concede that there is not enough evidence of them to disprove evolution.When you guys can build a machine that can do this:
2 Kings 6:17 And Elisha prayed, and said, LORD, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.
... then you'll have your scientific evidence.
Have a good day, gaara.Well, I'd hoped you were kidding. You were asked to provide an angel for analysis, and you instead produced a verse suggesting that angels walk among us, sometimes disguised as bums.
How, exactly, would synthesizing LSD serve as evidence of angels? Please only use that verse when it is relevant, AV. Meanwhile, either provide an operational definition of "angel" or concede that there is not enough evidence of them to disprove evolution.
Um, ok. That's even less of a response than before. The questions still stand. Because you still refuse to answer them, you've conceded the point. Thank you.Have a good day, gaara.
Angels don't exist.
Next.
Who rejoiced when the earth was created?Angel just means messenger, and throughout the Bible most 'Angels' are just normal mortal men or woman who delivered messages i.e in a battle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?