Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you even read what you write? Of course we do not spend money and time looking for "something you can't find." Aren't you the one going off on SETI all the time because it is a waste of money?I know why -- I've only been saying it for 5 years.
Science is myopic -- and it's easier to deny than assume, then have to spend money to hunt for something you can't find.
It certaintly isn't against biblical law... unless the woman is married (then only because it is adultery).Then why is rape against the law?
Neither can I.(I can't believe I'm discussing this.)
Dude, you're the one who brought up angels, you're the one that asked the question. I was just trying provide an answer to your question. Sorry if you don't like that answer.
The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.Otherwise, that's just playing into his nonsense.
It certaintly isn't against biblical law... unless the woman is married (then only because it is adultery).
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NIV
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels[a] of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
Gosh, I can't imagine.Then why is rape against the law?
No, she's showing sexual selection in choosing the best genes available. She gains more by being choosey about who she has sex with as she has a bigger time investment, whereas a man has different criteria, and isn't quite as choosey. A man, as you know, has a sex drive designed to find healthy, fertile females attractive (which means young and pretty) and given the right circumstances, will mate with a many as he possibly can.If an xx Homo sapiens turns down an xy Homo sapiens' attempt to procreate, is the xxHs fighting the preservation of favoured races?
You're actually discussing something real for once. Sex is the basis of most things, as you would know with your thorough knowledge of evolution.(I can't believe I'm discussing this.)
Hell according to biblical law if you want a wife just rape a virgin!
According to the reference in the bible fifty shekels is about 575 grams of silver. Going by the current price of silver that's about $675...
Pretty cheap for a virgin wife I think.
The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.
Thus, science "conveniently" manufactures rules and regulations that filter out these unknowns so effectively, that they aren't even a point-of-interest anymore.
Internet scientists then take it a step further and make these points-of-interest into points-of-ridicule.
The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.
Thus, science "conveniently" manufactures rules and regulations that filter out these unknowns so effectively, that they aren't even a point-of-interest anymore.
Internet scientists then take it a step further and make these points-of-interest into points-of-ridicule.
The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.
Thus, science "conveniently" manufactures rules and regulations that filter out these unknowns so effectively, that they aren't even a point-of-interest anymore.
Internet scientists then take it a step further and make these points-of-interest into points-of-ridicule.
If you know this, then why do you keep asking us to explain them?The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.
As science, no they are not. That does not mean that some scientists do not find them points of interest.Thus, science "conveniently" manufactures rules and regulations that filter out these unknowns so effectively, that they aren't even a point-of-interest anymore.
I guess "internet scientists" will continue to see these as points-of-ridicule as long as "internet creationists" ask silly questions, like: "did angels evolve?"Internet scientists then take it a step further and make these points-of-interest into points-of-ridicule.
The way your denial persists is both beautiful and tragic...The fact of the matter is that there are things which do [and did] exist that science can't begin to explain -- let alone know where to even start to look for.
Thus, science "conveniently" manufactures rules and regulations that filter out these unknowns so effectively, that they aren't even a point-of-interest anymore.
Internet scientists then take it a step further and make these points-of-interest into points-of-ridicule.
If you're going to claim 'this isn't true... at all', then you're going to have to come up with something better than cosmic background radiation; scientists had a reason for suspecting it.You go on to claim that science "filters out" what it can't explain. This isn't true... at all.
If you're going to claim 'this isn't true... at all', then you're going to have to come up with something better than cosmic background radiation; scientists had a reason for suspecting it.
But when it comes to angels, the Bible says that we can even entertain some people, while in reality, we're entertaining an angel and not even knowing it.
Truth of the matter is, most scientists today are nothing more than neo-Sadducees.
Acts 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
Truth of the matter is, most scientists today are nothing more than neo-Sadducees.
Acts 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
I could demonstrate my point with a poll, can you yours?Truth of the matter is, most scientists today are nothing more than neo-Sadducees.
Acts 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
Truth of the matter is, most creationists today are nothing more than neo-Pharisees.
Luke 11:44 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them.
What's the Bible got to do with anything? We're discussing evolution, not literature. You are required to provide an example of science "filtering out" what it cannot explain.But when it comes to angels, the Bible says that we can even entertain some people, while in reality, we're entertaining an angel and not even knowing it.
Evolution has its literature as well.What's the Bible got to do with anything? We're discussing evolution, not literature.
That's part of a title of a book written about evolution. What does your book have to do with evolution?Evolution has its literature as well.
Ever heard of The Preservation of Favoured Races?
Its very first page pwns evolution and atheism both.What does your book have to do with evolution?
Evolution has its literature as well.
Ever heard of The Preservation of Favoured Races?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?