• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution False? Absolute proof inside.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Ah yes I admit I am fallible That is where you and I differ. On the question of a Flood however my source (infallible) says there was one.

Sorry, you have not shown your source to be infallible. In fact if your source is the Bible it has hundreds of errors in it. It contradicts itself, it has bad science, it has failed prophecies.

That does not mean the Bible is worthless, but it also means that you have to use a bit of common sense when reading it.
 
Upvote 0

TasManOfGod

Untatted Saint
Sep 15, 2003
6,479
214
Tasmania
✟41,515.00
Faith
Word of Faith
The only one even claiming the existence of infallibility is you...It's not our fault that you can't comprehend that having an infallible source is not enough (unless you are that infallible source, of course). For you to be passing infallible information on, you have to actually interpret/understand/communicate that information infallibly as well.
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟117,103.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Indeed Do you know what that means as far as sin is concerned?

What? You mean God didn't intend to say that Jesus is LITERALLY a lamb? Or a rock? :doh::doh:


Do you know what the flood means as far as sin is concerned?
 
Upvote 0

TasManOfGod

Untatted Saint
Sep 15, 2003
6,479
214
Tasmania
✟41,515.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Wrong. The writers of the Bible said that. God did not say that. The Bible was written by men. Men can make mistakes.
It is the inspired Word of God Jesus Himself is the WORD become flesh. You can't get much more infallible than that.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you

He is pointing out that you are claiming you have an infallible source. You have not given any evidence at all that your source is infallible. In fact whenever your source is investigated it is found to be full of errors. By trying to claim your source is infallible you pretend that you can be infallible.

You have not shown that your source is infallible.
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟117,846.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you

Is your judgement that the bible is infallible an infallible judgement? Assuming it is infallible, is your interpretation of it equally infallible? Is it possible to misinterpret the bible?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
It is the inspired Word of God Jesus Himself is the WORD become flesh. You can't get much more infallible than that.

No, that is your interpretation of the Bible. Again, we ask for evidence. Not circular logic. If the Bible is the the "inspired word of God" why is it so full of errors?

The Bible does not even claim that it is infallible.
 
Upvote 0

TasManOfGod

Untatted Saint
Sep 15, 2003
6,479
214
Tasmania
✟41,515.00
Faith
Word of Faith
He is pointing out that you are claiming you have an infallible source. You have not given any evidence at all that your source is infallible. In fact whenever your source is investigated it is found to be full of errors. By trying to claim your source is infallible you pretend that you can be infallible.

You have not shown that your source is infallible.
Hey You forgot to use you sock
Just sayin
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟117,103.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you

Hm, trouble with reading comprehension. Who'd a thunk it? :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟117,103.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
He is pointing out that you are claiming you have an infallible source. You have not given any evidence at all that your source is infallible. In fact whenever your source is investigated it is found to be full of errors. By trying to claim your source is infallible you pretend that you can be infallible.

You have not shown that your source is infallible.

Actually, no. I'm even giving him the benefit of the doubt that the source is infallible. I'm saying the transmission of it TO him and FROM him to us is not infallible, so it doesn't even matter if his source is infallible.
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟117,103.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
[serious];65831522 said:
Who, exactly, do you think his sock is? The three people responding to you right now all have pretty different posting styles.

And we've got 21,000 posts between us...that's some pretty prolific puppeteering.
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟117,846.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well that is 2 more for the ignore list

Wait, what? This just got weird.


Well, weirder.

EDIT: also, which two are you ignoring? I'd really like to know which two you think are the same person.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.