Subduction Zone
Regular Member
No I just checked Genesis again. He definately said there was a flood.
Wrong. The writers of the Bible said that. God did not say that. The Bible was written by men. Men can make mistakes.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No I just checked Genesis again. He definately said there was a flood.
Ah yes I admit I am fallible That is where you and I differ. On the question of a Flood however my source (infallible) says there was one.
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank youThe only one even claiming the existence of infallibility is you...It's not our fault that you can't comprehend that having an infallible source is not enough (unless you are that infallible source, of course). For you to be passing infallible information on, you have to actually interpret/understand/communicate that information infallibly as well.
Indeed Do you know what that means as far as sin is concerned?


It is the inspired Word of God Jesus Himself is the WORD become flesh. You can't get much more infallible than that.Wrong. The writers of the Bible said that. God did not say that. The Bible was written by men. Men can make mistakes.
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you
It is the inspired Word of God Jesus Himself is the WORD become flesh. You can't get much more infallible than that.
Hey You forgot to use you sockHe is pointing out that you are claiming you have an infallible source. You have not given any evidence at all that your source is infallible. In fact whenever your source is investigated it is found to be full of errors. By trying to claim your source is infallible you pretend that you can be infallible.
You have not shown that your source is infallible.
Hey You forgot to use you sock
Just sayin
If that jumbled conglomerate of letters of the alphabet is assuming that I said I was infallible could you please refer me to my quote. Thank you
He is pointing out that you are claiming you have an infallible source. You have not given any evidence at all that your source is infallible. In fact whenever your source is investigated it is found to be full of errors. By trying to claim your source is infallible you pretend that you can be infallible.
You have not shown that your source is infallible.
Don't you mean "He has no idea what you are talking about"?I have no idea what you are talking about.
Hey You forgot to use you sock
Just sayin
[serious];65831522 said:Who, exactly, do you think his sock is? The three people responding to you right now all have pretty different posting styles.
Well that is 2 more for the ignore list
Well that is 2 more for the ignore list