Evolution as a Life Giving Process

[Heissonear]

Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.

It was Charles Darwin "Origin of the Species" text in 1859 that formulated the mechanisms of how evolution worked in producing all of the lifeforms of the past and present.

But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them. In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.

This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.

At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.

In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.

By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.

Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.

The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about. Godless naturalistic man can no longer state science and Naturalism can account for the Cosmos, Earth and life on Earth as the sole source for their existence.

Evolution is now based on conjecture, in year 2018.

What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times? Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?

 

[Brightmoon]

Ignorance Is Bliss .....but not in this case!


Abiogenesis is how life started. Evolution just shows how life changes and adapts to local environments over time.

 

[Colter]

Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.

It was Charles Darwin "Origin of the Species" text in 1859 that formulated the mechanisms of how evolution worked in producing all of the lifeforms of the past and present.

But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them. In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.

This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.

At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.

In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.

By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.

Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.

The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about. Godless naturalistic man can no longer state science and Naturalism can account for the Cosmos, Earth and life on Earth as the sole source for their existence.

Evolution is now based on conjecture, in year 2018.

What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times? Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?

Because life forms mutated, that's why there aren't transitional forms.

We say life evolved, not life came about by evolution. I believe that God created the life that evolved. Celestial beings placed those primitive life forms on earth.

 

[Brightmoon]

Because life forms mutated, that's why there aren't transitional forms.

We say life evolved, not life came about by evolution. I believe that God created the life that evolved. Celestial beings placed those primitive life forms on earth.

. There are a lot of transitional forms . The entire sequence from synapsids to mammals is there . Including one with a jaw with 2 hinges on different bones . ( the second jawbone eventually became one of the earbones)

Why do creationists keep repeating these lies? It’s trivially easy to find these fossils online nowadays

 

[AV1611VET]

Celestial beings placed those primitive life forms on earth.

Panspermia?

 

[Colter]

Panspermia?

Some of Gabriel's associates. You've heard of Gabriel right?

 

[Colter]

. There are a lot of transitional forms . The entire sequence from synapsids to mammals is there . Including one with a jaw with 2 hinges on different bones . ( the second jawbone eventually became one of the earbones)

Why do creationists keep repeating these lies? It’s trivially easy to find these fossils online nowadays

Mutation doesn't leave an intermediate step because there isn't one. There are the forms that one thing mutated from, mutation to mutation.

 

[dqhall]

Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.

It was Charles Darwin "Origin of the Species" text in 1859 that formulated the mechanisms of how evolution worked in producing all of the lifeforms of the past and present.

But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them. In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.

This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.

At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.

In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.

By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.

Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.

The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about. Godless naturalistic man can no longer state science and Naturalism can account for the Cosmos, Earth and life on Earth as the sole source for their existence.

Evolution is now based on conjecture, in year 2018.

What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times? Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?

Paleontologists can see the shape of fossils and estimate anatomical functions of extinct species. They cannot see what started a heart beat or how people receive comfort from God.

 

[Brightmoon]

There several species in different genera between synapsids and mammals

are you one of those creationists who think that evolution is like Pokémon? That’s not how evolution happens

 

[Brightmoon]

The Wikipedia article is accurate! But you’ll have to google as my phone won’t let me link for some odd reason. THIS IS A SCREENSHOT!

 

[AV1611VET]

Some of Gabriel's associates. You've heard of Gabriel right?

Yes

 

[expos4ever]

Evolution DOES NOT address the origin of life. Since it is hard to believe that you, of all people don’t know this, how is it that you are not engaging in deliberate misrepresentation?

 

[Valetic]

There is absolutely no proof of macro evolution. There are no missing links and if a species did mutate you would see more of those species over a longer period of time, not just some point in time where certain species just rapidly mutate over a few generations so missing links are established...

However, the evidence for micro evolution stacks up pretty quick. We can see through adaptive genetic changes over the course of generations that a species will adapt to its environment, not totally transform into a new species over few generations. And here's another thing, the bible says God said all things will reproduce after their kind time and time again.

So let me get this straight. You can't observe macro evolution but you can postulate and theorize and hypothesize and even in some cases LIE (research Lucy) but can't show me one observation or piece of evidence where a species is no longer the same species? You can't show me a single piece of evidence that we all have a common ancestor?

Why are we so hellbent on teaching our kids that the earth is millions of years old and that all life evolved then?

Could it be that this is a lie of the devil to discredit the word of God?

 

[Brightmoon]

There is absolutely no proof of macro evolution. There are no missing links and if a species did mutate you would see more of those species over a longer period of time, not just some point in time where certain species just rapidly mutate over a few generations so missing links are established...

However, the evidence for micro evolution stacks up pretty quick. We can see through adaptive genetic changes over the course of generations that a species will adapt to its environment, not totally transform into a new species over few generations. And here's another thing, the bible says God said all things will reproduce after their kind time and time again.

So let me get this straight. You can't observe macro evolution but you can postulate and theorize and hypothesize and even in some cases LIE (research Lucy) but can't show me one observation or piece of evidence where a species is no longer the same species? You can't show me a single piece of evidence that we all have a common ancestor?

Why are we so hellbent on teaching our kids that the earth is millions of years old and that all life evolved then?

Could it be that this is a lie of the devil to discredit the word of God?

that’s trivially easy to disprove . Macroevolution is defined by the mainstream scientific community as speciation . Just FYI since you don’t seem to know this . If you took high school biology in the USA then you learned about polyploid speciation . It’s when the offspring have a 4n chromosome number or twice as many as the parent species. This is macroevolution that you can see and it’s very very common in plants

 

[Valetic]

that’s trivially easy to disprove . Macroevolution is defined by the mainstream scientific community as speciation . Just FYI since you don’t seem to know this . If you took high school biology in the USA then you learned about polyploid speciation . It’s when the offspring have a 4n chromosome number or twice as many as the parent species. This is macroevolution that you can see and it’s very very common in plants

So you are telling me we can observe plants macro evolve over time?

 

[Valetic]

that’s trivially easy to disprove . Macroevolution is defined by the mainstream scientific community as speciation . Just FYI since you don’t seem to know this . If you took high school biology in the USA then you learned about polyploid speciation . It’s when the offspring have a 4n chromosome number or twice as many as the parent species. This is macroevolution that you can see and it’s very very common in plants

What evidence shows that every species was able to speciate that way?

 

[Brightmoon]

Sure - domestic roses Have 7, 14, 28 or 35 chromosomes depending on the species. As you see these chromosome counts are all multiples of seven . There is also both macaroni wheat and bread wheat . And don’t forget raphanobrassica ( of course they’ve changed the name since I was a kid but it’s easy to find) raphanobrassica is the offspring of a radish and a cabbage. The plant is healthy and fertile with other rsphanobrassicas but not with either parent species . This is all macroevolution that’s easy to observe. Usually happens in plants but has happened in animals

 

[SkyWriting]

Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.

It was Charles Darwin "Origin of the Species" text in 1859 that formulated the mechanisms of how evolution worked in producing all of the lifeforms of the past and present.

But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them. In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.

This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.

At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.

In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.

By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.

Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.

The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about. Godless naturalistic man can no longer state science and Naturalism can account for the Cosmos, Earth and life on Earth as the sole source for their existence.

Evolution is now based on conjecture, in year 2018.

What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times? Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?

Science doesn't produce proofs of any kind.
Just evidence in support of something.
And the Cosmos is here so something larger
than the entire Cosmos caused it.
(If we are assuming some loss in conversion efficiency)

 

[Brightmoon]

Science doesn't produce proofs of any kind.
Just evidence in support of something.
And the Cosmos is here so something larger
than the entire Cosmos caused it.
(If we are assuming some loss in conversion efficiency)

. Errr! Whut? Not sure what you meant. As Ricky said to Lucy “ Splain! ”

 

[SkyWriting]

. Errr! Whut? Not sure what you meant. As Ricky said to Lucy “ Splain! ”

The Cosmos is here so something larger
and more complex than the entire Cosmos caused it.