Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I did just that but you choose to ignorant the evidence. That link show the difference between the living body vs a river. Just as gasoline in an automobile it has to be controlled all the way thought in order for the car to work.
Is color variation is the best example you got? if so that evidence against evolution than for it. Or better yet is the blind cave fish. That's the best NS can do.
For example there are no example of a movable eyeball in a eye socket without muscles to control them.
Read those links if you are interested.
How can natural selection select between color variations since that would not impact someone ability to reproduce?
I believe that your claim which you need to prove. note i wrote without any muscular control at all. since I don't accept Darwin's "eyeball" story it's not up to me to prove it didn't happen.
How ironic. You have not provided one piece of evidence..zero to show that the design we see in life forms is incorrect, inaccurate or an illusion. You just have assertions and no evidence. You have opinion, an opinion I might add that is not reflective of the scientists that make the claim. They know that the evidence is design, they know that the appearance needs an explanation. If it were just a subjective opinion, there would be no need to address it at all.
" If you really want to understand how life came into existence you must first understand how easily it can become non-existent. Just as a mechanic knows that there are many different ways a car can "die," so too every physician knows that there are many different pathways to death. Theories about life that only describe where the different parts may have come from, or even how they may have come together to perform a specific function, as difficult as that may be, are not good enough. For medical science knows that when the body has allowed the rules of physics and chemistry to take over, having lost control and not being able to maintain the right level of any one chemical or vital function, then the consequence is death."
Are you suggesting that those who are color blind can't tell the difference between ripe fruit from unripe fruit? So you think people who eat less fruit has less offspring?
We are talking about the eye. I claim there is no evidence of the undeveloped eye just like there is no evidence of Martians even in the fossil record.
The design that appears in organisms. Scientists agree that organisms appear to be designed with a purpose. The evidence of this design is in the structural elements and molecular machines of those organisms.
The design is the evidence. It is up to anyone who claims this evidence is incorrect, inaccurate or an illusion to provide evidence to support it.
If you want to deny the design that is seen by scientists and layperson's alike that is totally up to you.
