The destiny seems to be certain and to disregard modern Israel based on this presentation is perhaps dismissing the means to which God allowed it to happen.
You are certainly correct that nothing happens in history that God does not allow and also use for His purposes. I also would say that looking at events in the current middle east and comparing them to Bible prophecy and how it was actually fulfilled is quite enlightening indeed. When you look at and understand the lies though, you see that its a false forced interpretation of the real prophecy that's being pushed by the agenda. And this is nothing new.
The written goals and agendas of these same wold elite are lined up with the literal accomplishment of these prophecy.
Now take your principle here and go back and take a look at 1st century history; because the wicked leadership of the nation did exactly what you are talking about here. And the wicked leadership of nations today are just repeating this phony fulfillment of prophecy in the same way the Jewish leaders in the 1st century did.
Please understand that I'm not saying that every politician today, of all nations on every level is evil. Everywhere of all levels of government we have "black hats" and "white hats"; and of course sometimes it's hard to tell who's who.
First century: history testifies to us that in the end, Nicodemus and Joseph of Aramathia (who were both members of the Sanhedrin); turned out to be "white hats". The Herodian dynasty, Caiaphas and Anais the high priests were all "black hats". Pilate was hard to determine. At the very least we could say he was "neutral" / "unknown".
There was a very clear power struggle between the Roman authority and the Sanhedrin. The Jews actually set Pilate up and if you understand the political back drop of the riots already in process that Pilate was tasked with keeping control over; the trial of Jesus makes more contextual sense in light of the way Pilate usually conducted himself. At the time of Jesus's trial, Pilate was actually "on probation" from Rome. This is likely in relation to an event eluded to in Scripture where Pilate sent a bunch of soldiers into the temple who executed a group of Galileans on the spot. (Luke 13:1 +)
And here's where the politics get really dark!
Jesus makes an interesting statement about this incident "who's blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices". Now go back into the Old Testament and you see that Jews were guilty of practicing ritual human sacrifice. There's references in the OT about them "passing (their) children through the fire" and worshiping Moloch. These accusations have followed Judaism through history, yet the accusations of the practice, morphed into the murder of foreigners.
Greek historians reference this; and this was the context of the Maccabean revolt. The stated reason (from the Greek perspective) as to why the king (Antiochus IV) refused to allow the Jews to practice their religious rituals. The decree came down from this (Greek) king the year following an incident where a Greek merchant who had been missing for nearly a year, was found hidden away in the Jewish temple. Allegedly, one of the captors told the merchant why he was being held there (he was being reasonably treated and was well fed) and king Antiochus IV discovered him. The merchant as soon as he saw the king, ran to him and fell at his feet and pleaded for his life; stating what the servant had told him was going to happen to him. He was told he'd be used in a ritual sacrifice that Jews had made to hate the Greeks forever.
Now the Jews claim this is just Greek propaganda; yet historically king Antiochus IV did pass this decree forbidding practice of Jewish rituals and the Maccabean revolt is a recorded event of history.
Now fast forward post resurrection and you see these accusations continue through history (even into the present) "crimes against children". (Does any of this ring any bells with modern politicians, the illuminati / occult, Epstein Island?) Think "Passion plays" of historic Europe and the riots that often accompanied them. Most of those incidents were not actually about accusations of "Jews killing Jesus"; they were more often connected to accusations and secular trials of "crimes against children".
Now today in many countries there are laws against even bringing up this subject. It's part of the "anti-Semitism" definitions of many nations' laws and also is wishing to be implemented as such stated by the UN as an "official definition of anti-Semitism". This, criticizing Israel, speaking of a "global Jewish conspiracy" and "denying the holocaust" are all included as "anti-Semitic acts" and can get you arrested in Europe!
So, yes looking at some of these "modern trends" as related to "Biblical prophecy" and recorded history even. I'm not sure how much of this stuff you are aware of; but, it's pretty ominous.
Now, getting back for a moment to the political power struggle in the 1st century:
Within that power struggle between Rome and the Jewish leadership; was also a power struggle between the Herods and the Hasmonean dynasty. The Herods were mixed Greek Judean ancestry and Herod the Great wanted really really
REALLY badly to believe he was the Messiah. Thus his attempt to kill Jesus when He was born.
So Herod destroyed all the genealogical records that came out of the Babylonian captivity, so no one could prove that he wasn't of the line of David. That was part of his "rebuilding the temple". I'll get to this in a minute because the Herodian temple was actually the 3rd temple.
The Jews have profaned the name of Jesus every they have been scattered but God will give them that new heart promised to those gathered back in the day the LORD takes away their reproach form the nations.
Now ask yourself in the context of Jesus being the Messiah; what do you think this means? Again, going back through history, starting with Exodus; what happened to the disobedient Jews? They perished. In every incident, they perished. All who did not repent and believe, regardless of what ever Biblical historical event they lived through; their outcome was always destruction.
Of course mixed in with this cooperate Israeli population were always those who did believe. Ironically though, if you read the OT carefully, you will see instances of gentiles who believe also.
Now we get to the New Testament and Paul is very clear about who God considers to be Israel. Those who are counted as seed are children of the promise not children of the flesh and all those are found in Christ who is "the seed" of Abraham. The promises concerning Israel were given to "the seed". This is how all prophecy is fulfilled in Christ.
The fact that a 3rd temple is on the horizon at a time when global government is being formed should be a clue.
I mentioned earlier that if a temple is reconstructed in our modern day; it would actually be the 4th one. Solomon built the first one (destroyed by the Babylonians). Zerubbabel built the 2nd temple which Herod totally tore down!
Now we're told Herod "expanded" the existing temple; but the truth was he totally tore it down and started over. He'd set forth a plan to do so, which the Sanhedrin initially rejected, because they did not trust him to rebuild it. The stipulation in Herod's plan to rebuild, had to include that all the material for the rebuild had to be "on site" before the tear down was allowed to begin. It took 10 years to rebuild, was completed in 9 BC and was rededicated the following year.
Now depending on whether or not you're using the secular or sacred calendar will depend on what year it is. (They ran 6 months apart.) We know though that at least by Passover of 8 BC, it was "finished enough" to be rededicated. By the time we get to the crucifixion year (33 AD) the temple is stated to have been under construction for 46 years. (John 2:20)
"Ironically" (or not); this is the year John the Baptist's father is in the temple performing his duty and the first time in about 400 years (since the completion of the OT cannon) that God speaks to Israel in the form of this angel who comes to John's father. John is conceived within the next couple of months. Jesus is conceived 6 months later. John is born about Passover of the following year and Jesus is born probably during the feast of Tabernacles of 7 BC.
Now here is an interesting tidbit of modern history. It will be 46 years from the inception of the temple institute (in 1988) to 2033 AD. (which is exactly 2000 years after the crucifixion). Any significance there? I have no idea!
The man of sin is revealed in the temple claiming to be God.
Scripture actually tells us the "son of perdition" was Judas. (John 17:12)
Now will this prevent those of the "self fulfilling prophecy" from coming up with their own "son of perdition"? Maybe but probably not. I wouldn't bet my next social security check that they are going to "get that far". Jesus speaks of His return "as a thief in the night" and "as it was in the days of Noah". Men were eating and drinking and marrying and giving in marriage until the day Noah entered the arc and the flood came and took them all away. Which basically implies that they had no idea what hit them; and by that point it was too late! This should be a warning to us.
If we are gearing our understanding of Bible prophecy based on perceived political events; the Day is going to come and we aint going to know what hit us, because we're too busy watching someones' political wrangling to tear down a mosque and build a temple; thinking oh, we have X amount of years of tribulation to "get right with God". I'll worry about it when I see the "signs of the times".
The move to end national soverreignty and eliminate cash is also part of the agenda.
Yes, no denying that there's an agenda; but get in your Bible and start digging. Things are not as they appear to be!