Eve came from Adam, evolution does not allow this

[dad]

No you didn't. I gave you already links from protestant to catholic sites on the word, read it.
Even in the Septuagint the word used is pleura - which is also means side of the body.

Here, more christian sites:
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org...n/the-adam-and-eve-story-eve-came-from-where/
What is the application/meaning of the fact that God created Eve from the rib of Adam in Genesis 2:21-23 | Evidence for Christianity

You are clearly rejecting facts.

Guess we can agree to disagree..not so much that ribs or some bones are on the side, but that God took one of em and made a cute girl for Adam.

 

[dad]

What? Now the Bible is not fully the word of God, only Genesis is??

The inspired word of God includes people, and when a quote is from a man (one known to have sinned greatly no less) and the rest of the bible already makes the issue clear, then we know how God feels. David said something like 'one day I shall surely die at the hand of my enemies' that does not mean God inspired the fear. Besides when you look up different translations many will clear that up by saying something like 'man is like a beast'. Clearly man is not a beast, with a possible few exceptions that have given over to evil.

Great! So now stop your "worshiping demon science" chant when somebody does not read Genesis literally.

If someone says things violently opposed to the bible, that is not of God. The issue is not literalism but unbelief. The creation account is verified through the bible and is not optional. No translation of words affects anything about God having created all things and taking the women from man etc.

 

[dad]

Truth does not equal to "being literal". .

Unless one states something that cannot be taken any other way. When you start using secret extra meanings to make real events disappear into the fog of myth and dreams, you have lost touch with Scripture.

 

[dad]

You are here to adjust it ? Charming.

Thanks. Demon science adjusted God's word, and I try to be a re adjuster.

 

[trophy33]

Unless one states something that cannot be taken any other way. When you start using secret extra meanings to make real events disappear into the fog of myth and dreams, you have lost touch with Scripture.

Unwillingness to learn cultural backgrounds and about the literature of the era is not equal to "secret extra meaning".

Its not secret, its public. Its only "deeper" than a first time surface literal reading and requires more time and energy to invest.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

Thanks. Demon science adjusted God's word, and I try to be a re adjuster.

Well atleast you bring on every issue that childish faith you always talk about. Combined with infantile understanding it makes all of your posting quite hard to debate.

 

[trophy33]

Thanks. Demon science adjusted God's word, and I try to be a re adjuster.

Men are animals as the Bible clearly says. Do not adjust it to your YEC bad science, then.

"I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts."
Ecc 3:18

 

[-57]

Side what the original hebrew word uses,

Poor reply. If all of the translators...and there is a lot of them....got something that simple so wrong i'm afraiad of what they did with the rest of the bible.

Your response was judged as failed.

 

[-57]

Because Paul didn't know how the Earth and life on the Earth were actually created, so he incorrectly read an allegory as being literal.

So, now you're telling me Paul wasn't inspired by God when he wrote much of the NT.

Please rethink your reply.

 

[-57]

The original Hebrew says Eve was made from half of Adam.

No it doesn't

 

[-57]

I know how science says it was created. We don’t have final answers on that.

Science says a dead guy can't come back to life on day 3. So, using your logic I would suppose the resurrection was also allegorical.

Can you explain that allegory?

 

[-57]

Ah, demon science. I presume that you didn’t get your various vaccines, after all they were invented by demon science. Do you also deny that American men walked on the moon? That was demon science too.

The science of vaccines and the Apollo program were not designed to do away with the foundation of Christianity.

Should we get back to original sin? You still haven't answered the question. But, heck, why do you need to ? The fall never happened and we don't really need Jesus.

 

[-57]

"Evolutionism"
n.
A term for the foolish misconceptions YECs have about evolution.

The Bible doesn't teach that, but the important thing is that the Bible doesn't reject evolution. How could it? The same person is the Author of both of them.

Once again, and I'll type slowly for you....Forming -Adam- from-the -dust- then-
Eve -from -Adams -rib -is -not -evolutionism.

 

[Cis.jd]

Poor reply. If all of the translators...and there is a lot of them....got something that simple so wrong i'm afraiad of what they did with the rest of the bible.

Your response was judged as failed.

I've already brought in sources from various christian sites, you on the other hand are just responding to what you randomly come up with in your head. Sorry, but your arguments have shown that you are completely uneducated and have 0 care about facts.

 

[trophy33]

Once again, and I'll type slowly for you....Forming -Adam- from-the -dust- then-
Eve -from -Adams -rib -is -not -evolutionism.

When you will learn that "dust" means "mortality", not chemical material of man's composition, you will understand the message of Genesis much more.

 

[-57]

Only YECs have to re-explain the fall and our nature as fallen beings.

I'm still waiting on your explanation of the fall. Do you think you'll get around to it or will you keep avoiding it like the rest of the Theo-Evos who post here?

YEC was invented by the Seventh-Day Adventists in the early 20th century, and their new revision of Genesis required some changes in traditional Christian belief.

Such as?????

And just as Genesis has no position on evolution, so does science have no position on miracles. These are neither confirmed nor denied by the other.

Sure it has a position. It tells us Adam was made from the dust then Eve from Adams rib. That's in STRONG contrast to the T.o.E.
Then it goes on to say Eve was the mother of all which goes against the populations evolve therot presented by all evolutionist.

So, I kinda fail to see your point.

 

[-57]

Why did God use Adam's rib to create Eve?

I agree the rib was in Adams side.

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-interpretation/the-adam-and-eve-story-

Created from "his os baculum (penis bone)." .....wow.

eve-came-from-where/

Another chop Adam in half interpretation. I suppose this interpretation would include God using six ribs and all the organs on that side of the body.

Did Eve Come from Adam’s "Rib"? - Israel Bible Weekly

Adam, Eve, and Evolution
^

Even these links tell you

The catholic version where they say I don't know and straddle the fence.

 

[-57]

When you will learn that "dust" means "mortality", not chemical material of man's composition, you will understand the message of Genesis much more.

I can hardly wait to hear this cryptic explanation.

 

[-57]

I've already brought in sources from various christian sites, you on the other hand are just responding to what you randomly come up with in your head. Sorry, but your arguments have shown that you are completely uneducated and have 0 care about facts.

To be honest I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions.

I post them and all you seem to do is play dodge ball.

 

[Cis.jd]

I agree the rib was in Adams side.

But it wasn't a rib, just as all those christians sites said. Rejecting and inserting random guesses again.

Created from "his os baculum (penis bone)." .....wow.

wow.. now you're showing inability to comprehend what you are reading.

Another chop Adam in half interpretation. I suppose this interpretation would include God using six ribs and all the organs on that side of the body.

Another line of you showing bad reading comprehension. I'm assuming you just skimmed and in 5 seconds replied straight away. These sites are telling you that 1. The word isn't "rib" and 2 the whole thing is a metaphor.

The catholic version where they say I don't know and strattle the fence.

Just admit it already, you really don't care to even try to have something educated to say.

You've lost the argument.