• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Eschatological Views

Status
Not open for further replies.

inhimitrust

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2004
452
35
Texas
✟837.00
Faith
Non-Denom
According to Josephus's account of Jerusalem, the siege was cut short by a long period of time. But since people refute what he says, who the heck am I to say anything. If it wasn't for his account, I would be hard pressed to believe a temple even existed, wouldn't you? At such an important biblical event such as that, it is still amazing to me that nothing much is written about and preserved somewhere. I may go over there myself and see if I can dig up something as I would really like to know what went on during apocolyptic "great" event in church history. Guess that is what faith is all about.
 
Upvote 0

Telrunya

Student of the Word
Jun 24, 2004
1,906
120
55
Bainbridge Island Washington St.
✟2,747.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Satan is not the opposite of God. He is the opposite of Michael, and is a created being. He is not the adversary of God but rather the adversary of man. I believe when you reduce Satan and God as figurative and opposite representations you are stepping way across the lines of apostasy. If you take the bible to mean exactly what it says, then the pre-millennial pre wrath rapture is the only view that makes sense IMO
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Telrunya said:
Satan is not the opposite of God. He is the opposite of Michael, and is a created being. He is not the adversary of God but rather the adversary of man. I believe when you reduce Satan and God as figurative and opposite representations you are stepping way across the lines of apostasy. If you take the bible to mean exactly what it says, then the pre-millennial pre wrath rapture is the only view that makes sense IMO
While your opposites may match up logically, your opinion of the Pre-millenial wrath is in err. You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude. Revelation is a mystery and to lay it out like a road map or timeline is only satisfying your desire to know what will happen, but Revelation wasn't meant to be a timeline of certain events signifying the end of man. I think it is more of a promise to those who believe of what will come.

Jesus told his disciples that not even he knew when the end would come because the Father in Heaven had not revealed it to him. So if Jesus doesn't know, how can you know?


Scott Strohkirch
Lutheran at Large
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
SLStrohkirch said:
You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude.
Rather, you must interprate Revelation the way you interprate Genesis through Jude. Revelation must not be interprated in a vacuum, as you suggest.


Revelation is a mystery
Rather, it is a Revelation, literally a Revealing.

Jesus told his disciples that not even he knew when the end would come because the Father in Heaven had not revealed it to him. So if Jesus doesn't know, how can you know?
True, Jesus didn't know 'when' while on earth, but scripture records that sometime after the ascention, The Father told Him when, and He sent this information to John, charging Him to record it for us.

Revelation 1:1-3
1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: 2 Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw. 3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.
 
Upvote 0

sweetsarge

Member
Jun 5, 2004
13
0
✟123.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have a question about Revelation 20. I will quote the specific verse from two different versions and then post my question. :help:

Revelation 20:4-5

King James Version:

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them and judgment was given unto them; and I saw the souls of them that were behead for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their forheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

NIV Version:

I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
:confused:
Question:

Does this imply that only those who were faithful with Christ during the tribulation and died for Him will return with Christ to reign for 1 thousand years and the rest of the saints (the ones who died before the tribulation began) will not return until the 1 thousand years are ended?

If anyone can help me with this, will appreciate it alot. :amen:
Sweet
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
vinsight4u said:
All of the saints will sit, then John just notes that among them are the ones that were beheaded. He goes on to tell us that .......this is

the first resurrection

So all from Adam to even the two witnesses from the trib time must be in this group that sits on thrones.
the first resurrection crowd

It is here, after Satan has been bound, that all from the first resurrection crowd will take their seats.

Satan bound for 1000 years
while the saved people rule with Jesus for 1000 years


hath part in the first resurrection
they shall be the priests of God and
reign with Him a thousand years

When the thousand years are up
Satan is loosed out of his prison.
Satan sets out to deceive the nations again.
Why?
Those born during the time Jesus and the saved people reign must eventually be tested by the devil.
So are you saying you believe in a "literal" millenium?

Scott
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
vinsight4u said:
I believe that Jesus will return at the 7th trumpet. The great tribulation against the church and Israel will be over then. It will be announced that the kingdoms of this world have become His. Thus to say........that the place of the kingdom throne for the earth is taken forever back and it will be done by Jesus Christ. He will free Israel and take the all changed at the last trumpet crowd home to heaven.

Rev. 19:6
Rev. 11:15
Ah yes, another reason not to take the book of Revelation too literally.

This book is supposed to be a mystery and all Dispensationalists want to do is take the mystery out and solve it for all mankind. I disagree with that interpretation. Leave the mystery a mystery and God will tell you when his time will come and not a moment sooner.

Scott Strohkirch:yawn:
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
sweetsarge said:
I have a question about Revelation 20. I will quote the specific verse from two different versions and then post my question. :help:

Revelation 20:4-5

King James Version:

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them and judgment was given unto them; and I saw the souls of them that were behead for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their forheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

NIV Version:

I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
:confused:
Question:

Does this imply that only those who were faithful with Christ during the tribulation and died for Him will return with Christ to reign for 1 thousand years and the rest of the saints (the ones who died before the tribulation began) will not return until the 1 thousand years are ended?

If anyone can help me with this, will appreciate it alot. :amen:
Sweet
Ok, here is a Lutheran point of view on this scripture. I got it from Pastor Will Weedon in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.

They often accuse us of not taking the Scripture literally, specifically in regard to this passage. But what this passage literally says is that only those who are *beheaded* (like St. Paul, whose martyrdom the Church celebrated yesterday) come alive and reign with Christ for the "1000 years." Good news for the Christians who suffer martyrdom in Iraq, I suppose. But I have NEVER heard a dispensationalist say that this refers only to those who are martyred by beheading.

Franzmann: 4. The futility of Satan's still-impending last attack (the great tribulation of which Jesus had spoken, Matt 24:21) is already foretokened by the succinct description of the fate of the persecuted church in vv. 4-6. During those "thousand years" the existence of the church has before it the key signature of dying, and behold we live (2 Cor. 6:9; cf. Romans 8:37 *In all these things* we are more than conquerors through him who loved us). Those faithful ones who have been judged and condemned in human courts, beheaded for their testimony to Jesus (because they have confessed Him as the acquitting Word of God, 19:13, which silences the voice of the accuser and makes void the claim of Antichrist to their worship and fealty) they are in reality not judged and condemned men but the judges; they are enthroned as judges over all the hostile powers which have apparently triumphed over them. In the court of God the verdict of the world is reversed; there the Spirit pleads their cause and convinces the world concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged (John 16:8,11). John's language recalls the description in Daniel of the judgment executed through the Son of Man upon the four beasts arising from the sea who symbolized the powers hostile to God and His people (Dan. 7:9-14). Those who have lost their lives for Christ's sake find their life (Matt 10:39); they come to life and reign with Christ (cf. John 12:26).

5. Christ promise, I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live. (John 11:25) and He holds to His word. For those who believe in Him there is a first resurrection, a being-raised to a life not canceled out by mens dying, a life like that of the risen Christs, no longer exposed to death (cf. Roman 6:9). Those who have refused to find resurrection and life in Christ will not share in this first resurrection during the 1,000 years.

Millennial Hope:

The three verses of Rev. 20:4-6 are actually the only basis for what has come to be known as millennialism (a term derived from the Latin for thousand years) or chiliasm (from the Greek word for thousand), namely the expectation (in a variety of forms) Òthat before the resurrection of the dead, saints and godly men will possess and worldly kingdom and annihilate all the godless (AC XVII). The words of our Lord, in all other respects in strong agreement with the witness of the Revelation to John, say nothing of a triumphant interregnum of Christ and His own before His final return to judge the quick and the dead and to gather His elect into glory. With this the rest of the NT witnesses agree. The whole NT witness is not only silent as regards a millennium; rather, it excludes the idea of a millennium: according to it, the church will remain the church hidden under the cross to the very end, and he who endure to the end will be saved (Matt 10:22) Those who cherish and foster the millennial hope (and these have from of old included great and good men) need to ask themselves whether the desire to have and enjoy a visible victory before the final victory of the Crucified is not a subtle and unconscious form of objection to the Crucified who unseals the scroll taken from the hand of God; He in His wisdom and power keeps the church hidden under the cross, and He has promised to be with His church, under the cross, to the close of the age. (Matt 28:20)
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,563
19,929
USA
✟2,089,156.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
sweetsarge said:
I have a question about Revelation 20. I will quote the specific verse from two different versions and then post my question. :help:

Revelation 20:4-5

King James Version:

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them and judgment was given unto them; and I saw the souls of them that were behead for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their forheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

NIV Version:

I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
:confused:
Question:

Does this imply that only those who were faithful with Christ during the tribulation and died for Him will return with Christ to reign for 1 thousand years and the rest of the saints (the ones who died before the tribulation began) will not return until the 1 thousand years are ended?

If anyone can help me with this, will appreciate it alot. :amen:
Sweet
In understanding this passage, one needs to look at how those who are at the second resurrection are judged, and then also look at eveything else in scriture about judgment. We, who are in Christ, are not under condemnation (Romans 8:1), and while we face the judgement seat of Christ (Romans 14:10), are not judged on our works to determine our salvation, but are rewarded or not rewarded for our acts. But we are still saved. Those in the second resurrection are judged by their works and face the fire of condemnation (the second death).

Also, consider that "first resurrection" can refer to a 'resurrection to life'. It started with Christ, the firstfruits of the resurrection. Those who are i Christ are resurrected or raptured to Christ prior to the Second Coming...for we return with Him:
Rev 17:14 "These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him {are the} called and chosen and faithful." The tribulation saints, who are those who did not worship the beast or image or take the mark, are raised after the Second Coming (shown in Rev. 19) and then reign with Christ in the millennial kingdom.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,563
19,929
USA
✟2,089,156.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
SLStrohkirch said:
While your opposites may match up logically, your opinion of the Pre-millenial wrath is in err. You can't try to interpret Revelation the way that you interpret Genesis through Jude. Revelation is a mystery and to lay it out like a road map or timeline is only satisfying your desire to know what will happen, but Revelation wasn't meant to be a timeline of certain events signifying the end of man. I think it is more of a promise to those who believe of what will come.

Jesus told his disciples that not even he knew when the end would come because the Father in Heaven had not revealed it to him. So if Jesus doesn't know, how can you know?


Scott Strohkirch
Lutheran at Large
I beleive you are in error, here. Revelation is to be interpreted similar to other prophecy, and one needs to interpret it in light of scripture. Daniel, Ezekiel, Joel, Zechariah, Zephaniah, Hosea, and even Genesis (and more) shed light on Revelation, for there is yet unfulfilled prophecy in the OT.
Look at who it is from:
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated {it} by His angel to His bond-servant John,Rev 1:2 who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, {even} to all that he saw.

The end will come when God decrees it, but there is this:
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FreeinChrist said:
I beleive you are in error, here. Revelation is to be interpreted similar to other prophecy, and one needs to interpret it in light of scripture. Daniel, Ezekiel, Joel, Zechariah, Zephaniah, Hosea, and even Genesis (and more) shed light on Revelation, for there is yet unfulfilled prophecy in the OT.
Look at who it is from:
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated {it} by His angel to His bond-servant John,Rev 1:2 who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, {even} to all that he saw.

The end will come when God decrees it, but there is this:
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.
While I don't disagree that we should heed that which is written in it you mention the OT prophets which, with the exception of Daniel, either give prophecy concerning Christ's first coming or events that were to come in their time. The 1000 years is mentioned only as a completion of time not a literal 1000 years.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,563
19,929
USA
✟2,089,156.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
SLStrohkirch said:
Ok, here is a Lutheran point of view on this scripture. I got it from Pastor Will Weedon in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.

They often accuse us of not taking the Scripture literally, specifically in regard to this passage. But what this passage literally says is that only those who are *beheaded* (like St. Paul, whose martyrdom the Church celebrated yesterday) come alive and reign with Christ for the "1000 years." Good news for the Christians who suffer martyrdom in Iraq, I suppose. But I have NEVER heard a dispensationalist say that this refers only to those who are martyred by beheading.
His obvious lack of knowledge of dispenationism is showing here, for those who have been martyred prior to the Tribulation period are raised/raptured and then return WITH Christ at the Second Coming , which brings in the millennial reign. Those that are beheaded by the AC ( the beast) are rasied AFTER the Second Coming.
Franzmann: 4. The futility of Satan's still-impending last attack (the great tribulation of which Jesus had spoken, Matt 24:21) is already foretokened by the succinct description of the fate of the persecuted church in vv. 4-6. During those "thousand years" the existence of the church has before it the key signature of dying, and behold we live (2 Cor. 6:9; cf. Romans 8:37 *In all these things* we are more than conquerors through him who loved us). Those faithful ones who have been judged and condemned in human courts, beheaded for their testimony to Jesus (because they have confessed Him as the acquitting Word of God, 19:13, which silences the voice of the accuser and makes void the claim of Antichrist to their worship and fealty) they are in reality not judged and condemned men but the judges; they are enthroned as judges over all the hostile powers which have apparently triumphed over them. In the court of God the verdict of the world is reversed; there the Spirit pleads their cause and convinces the world concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged (John 16:8,11). John's language recalls the description in Daniel of the judgment executed through the Son of Man upon the four beasts arising from the sea who symbolized the powers hostile to God and His people (Dan. 7:9-14). Those who have lost their lives for Christ's sake find their life (Matt 10:39); they come to life and reign with Christ (cf. John 12:26).
More error on his part about the Dispensationist view. Those that go Against Christ at the Second Coming are dead and do not ienter the millennial reign. It is only thosewho belonged to the nations that went against Christ who survive...but then they are subject to 'the sheep and goat judgment.'
And it is Christ who reigns, and we are subject to Him, though we reign with Him.
"In the court of God the verdict of the world is reversed; there the Spirit pleads their cause and convinces the world concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged (John 16:8,11)."
He is taking this verse out of context. It is NOW that the Spirit is convicting the world of sin. Satan was thrown down at the cross and resurrection of Christ, for he no longer has the power of death.
Hbr 2:14 Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil,Hbr 2:15 and might free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives.

John 16:8, 11 is not about the millennial reign, but about now.

5. Christ promise, I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live. (John 11:25) and He holds to His word. For those who believe in Him there is a first resurrection, a being-raised to a life not canceled out by mens dying, a life like that of the risen Christs, no longer exposed to death (cf. Roman 6:9). Those who have refused to find resurrection and life in Christ will not share in this first resurrection during the 1,000 years.
And this agrees with dispensationism, and the view that the 'first resurrection' is a resurrection to life.

Millennial Hope:

The three verses of Rev. 20:4-6 are actually the only basis for what has come to be known as millennialism (a term derived from the Latin for thousand years) or chiliasm (from the Greek word for thousand), namely the expectation (in a variety of forms) Òthat before the resurrection of the dead, saints and godly men will possess and worldly kingdom and annihilate all the godless (AC XVII).
I don't think your friend understands premillennialism in the least.
Premillennialism (chilaism) beleives that Christ returns, defeated in the AC and false prophet and their armies and reigns in vicotiry in a literal earthly reign as described in Zechariah 14. Psalm 24 is also about the reign, and the later part of Psalm 22:
Psa 22:23 You who fear the LORD, praise Him; All you descendants of Jacob, glorify Him, And stand in awe of Him, all you descendants of Israel.

Psa 22:24 For He has not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; Nor has He hidden His face from him; But when he cried to Him for help, He heard.

Psa 22:25 From You {comes} my praise in the great assembly; I shall pay my vows before those who fear Him.

Psa 22:26 The afflicted will eat and be satisfied; Those who seek Him will praise the LORD. Let your heart live forever!

Psa 22:27 All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the LORD, And all the families of the nations will worship before You.

Psa 22:28 For the kingdom is the LORD'S And He rules over the nations.

Psa 22:29 All the prosperous of the earth will eat and worship, All those who go down to the dust will bow before Him, Even he who cannot keep his soul alive.

Psa 22:30 Posterity will serve Him; It will be told of the Lord to the {coming} generation.

Psa 22:31 They will come and will declare His righteousness To a people who will be born, that He has performed {it.}
And if you study the Bible instead of listening to preachers, you will see that it is GOD who destroys the wicked - dispensationsim agrees with this.

The words of our Lord, in all other respects in strong agreement with the witness of the Revelation to John, say nothing of a triumphant interregnum of Christ and His own before His final return to judge the quick and the dead and to gather His elect into glory. With this the rest of the NT witnesses agree. The whole NT witness is not only silent as regards a millennium; rather, it excludes the idea of a millennium: according to it, the church will remain the church hidden under the cross to the very end, and he who endure to the end will be saved (Matt 10:22)
The earthly reign is referred to in the OT, the apostles expected that Christ would start an earthly reign in Acts 1, and the amount of time of the reign was not given UNTIL 95-96 AD, to John.
Rev 20:1 Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand.
Rev 20:2 And he laid hold of the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years;
Rev 20:3 and he threw him into the abyss, and shut {it} and sealed {it} over him, so that he would not deceive the nations any longer, until the thousand years were completed; after these things he must be released for a short time.
Rev 20:4 Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I {saw} the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
Rev 20:5 The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed. This is the first resurrection.

Now when God said that the Isrealites would wander 40 yers, did He mean 40 years? When God gave the prophecy of captivity for 70 years, didn't he mean 70 years? 1000 is no different. It was given by God.

Has Satan been ineffective for the last 2000 years? He is shut in the abyss during the millennium....has he been inactive in the 2000 years?

Those who cherish and foster the millennial hope (and these have from of old included great and good men) need to ask themselves whether the desire to have and enjoy a visible victory before the final victory of the Crucified is not a subtle and unconscious form of objection to the Crucified who unseals the scroll taken from the hand of God; He in His wisdom and power keeps the church hidden under the cross, and He has promised to be with His church, under the cross, to the close of the age. (Matt 28:20)
Those who deny the prophecy of the millennial reign need to ask themselves why they question God. Why don't they listen to the following:
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,563
19,929
USA
✟2,089,156.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
SLStrohkirch said:
While I don't disagree that we should heed that which is written in it you mention the OT prophets which, with the exception of Daniel, either give prophecy concerning Christ's first coming or events that were to come in their time. The 1000 years is mentioned only as a completion of time not a literal 1000 years.
God gave many prophecies that gave a literal time - to Abraham about the enslavement of Israel, about the wandeing in the wilderness for 40 years, about the 70 year captivity in Babylon....why is this prophecy, given by God, not literal? Because Augustine, after 400 AD, decided it was?

Satan is bound and shut in the abyss during the 1000 years....so he has been not in effect on the earth all these years?
Why did Peter refer to Satan as the "prince of the power of the air? And refer to being hindered by Satan if Satan is in the abyss? Satan is a created being, a fallen angel, and is not omnipresent.
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FreeinChrist said:
God gave many prophecies that gave a literal time - to Abraham about the enslavement of Israel, about the wandeing in the wilderness for 40 years, about the 70 year captivity in Babylon....why is this prophecy, given by God, not literal? Because Augustine, after 400 AD, decided it was?

Satan is bound and shut in the abyss during the 1000 years....so he has been not in effect on the earth all these years?
Why did Peter refer to Satan as the "prince of the power of the air? And refer to being hindered by Satan if Satan is in the abyss? Satan is a created being, a fallen angel, and is not omnipresent.
Revelation is not altogether a literal prophesy to lay out as a road to show that such and such will happen at this time or that time. I never said I didn't believe that Satan was not a created being, but he has been in effect. We are all sinners and tempted to sin each and every day. Just because we are saved by our confession of Christ does not mean that we are not still sinners.

I believe that some things in Revelation can be taken literally, but most of it is an enigma that we may never understand until the judgement when we are taken up in the air after the dead in Christ are raised.

Tell me what happens to the OT saints?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.