• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Eschatological and Millennial Theories and their problems.

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The whole problem with the Pharisees was, they would use the Talmud or oral Torah. Problem is, it was created by human tradition. What could possibly go wrong right? Well when you read the gospels and Jesus states "you have heard it has been said.." Jesus is referring to the oral torah which Christ is saying, " I was there with Moses on the mountain and I DID NOT SAY THAT!" the oral torah, the synagogue have NOTHING to do with the law, it was created during the Babylonian captivity because they didn't have the actual torah with them then. So they created the Talmud(oral torah) and they couldn't have a Temple in Babylon rather, they created the synagogue.
Regardless of the their source, the Pharisees looked for the same physical kingdom many Christians look for. And both groups miss it because it is spiritual and not physical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Same warning to flee to the mountains, yes.

Luke 21:20-21 was a warning of what to do when the Romans came, back in the first century, right? That's the essence of what you been saying.

Matthew 24:15-16, on the other hand, is different because it is the warning of what do when after the long period of Luke 21:23 is finished, and Matthew 24:14 is finished. And the world , not just Jerusalem, enters the great tribulation.

Luke 21:24-25 is the same as in Matthew 24:29-30.

Can you explain why the verse below is in the Bible?

Joh 10:22 And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.


Can you explain what Josephus was talking about below?

From "Antiquities of the Jews" by Josephus, Book 12, chapter 7

"6. When therefore the generals of Antiochus's armies had been beaten so often, Judas assembled the people together, and told them, that after these many victories which God had given them, they ought to go up to Jerusalem, and purify the temple, and offer the appointed sacrifices. But as soon as he, with the whole multitude, was come to Jerusalem, and found the temple deserted, and its gates burnt down, and plants growing in the temple of their own accord, on account of its desertion, he and those that were with him began to lament, and were quite confounded at the sight of the temple; so he chose out some of his soldiers, and gave them order to fight against those guards that were in the citadel, until he should have purified the temple. When therefore he had carefully purged it, and had brought in new vessels, the candlestick, the table [of shew-bread], and the altar [of incense], which were made of gold, he hung up the veils at the gates, and added doors to them. He also took down the altar [of burnt-offering], and built a new one of stones that he gathered together, and not of such as were hewn with iron tools. So on the five and twentieth day of the month Casleu, which the Macedonians call Apeliens, they lighted the lamps that were on the candlestick, and offered incense upon the altar [of incense], and laid the loaves upon the table [of shew-bread], and offered burnt-offerings upon the new altar [of burnt-offering]. Now it so fell out, that these things were done on the very same day on which their Divine worship had fallen off, and was reduced to a profane and common use, after three years' time; for so it was, that the temple was made desolate by Antiochus, and so continued for three years. This desolation happened to the temple in the hundred forty and fifth year, on the twenty-fifth day of the month Apeliens, and on the hundred fifty and third olympiad: but it was dedicated anew, on the same day, the twenty-fifth of the month Apeliens, on the hundred and forty-eighth year, and on the hundred and fifty-fourth olympiad. And this desolation came to pass according to the prophecy of Daniel, which was given four hundred and eight years before; for he declared that the Macedonians would dissolve that worship [for some time].

7. Now Judas celebrated the festival of the restoration of the sacrifices of the temple for eight days, and omitted no sort of pleasures thereon; but he feasted them upon very rich and splendid sacrifices; and he honored God, and delighted them by hymns and psalms. Nay, they were so very glad at the revival of their customs, when, after a long time of intermission, they unexpectedly had regained the freedom of their worship, that they made it a law for their posterity, that they should keep a festival, on account of the restoration of their temple worship, for eight days. And from that time to this we celebrate this festival, and call it Lights. I suppose the reason was, because this liberty beyond our hopes appeared to us; and that thence was the name given to that festival. Judas also rebuilt the walls round about the city, and reared towers of great height against the incursions of enemies, and set guards therein. He also fortified the city Bethsura, that it might serve as a citadel against any distresses that might come from our enemies. "


Josephus confirms above the understanding of the Jews of his time, who knew that Daniel had predicted the events of 167 BC, by Antiochus Epiphanes.
Josephus confirms it as a historical fact.


John 10:22 is a reference to the celebration of Hanukkah each year by the Jews of Jesus time.


The Book of Matthew was addressed mainly to a Jewish audience. Jesus was telling the Jews of His time that something similar to 167 BC would happen during 70 AD. Not only did Antiochus desecrate the temple, but he also attacked the city killing thousands of Jews and stopped the temple sacrifices. The temple sacrifices would also stop in 70 AD, due to the destruction of the temple. Based on John 10:22, the Jews were well aware of this historical fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy. Luke’s Gospel was written to more of a Gentile audience, so he spelled it out for them.


Matthew 24:15-16 and Luke 21:20-21 are clearly parallel accounts, because we have the exact same warning to flee from Judea to the mountains in the second verse of each Gospel.


.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is not a testimony of silence, but the united testimony of the ancient writers. You are insisting that your interpretation is correct, without even a scrap of scriptural or historical evidence to back up that interpretation.

But as this has devolved into a childish argument, I am bowing out.
Have you considered when God broke off the unbelieving Jews from Israel in Romans 11, the only Israel remaining was spiritual Israel who followed Jesus. And the broken off Jews became gentiles by default when Jesus abolished circumcision on the cross? That is, none of your prophetic claims have a physical Israel remaining to fulfill them?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus very explicitly told them to flee with great haste when they saw the Abomination of Desolation. This hasty flight did not happen. You are ignoring the fact that in another place, Jesus also told them that when Jerusalem was surrounded by armies, its desolation was near, so they should leave. But he did not attach panicky haste to that instruction. The Christians withdrew in an orderly fashion, and were long gone when the Romans returned.

As I pointed out before, at the time the abomination of desolation is falsely alleged to have taken place, it was too late to flee, as all exits had been blocked.
Are you saying there were no converts to Christ in Jerusalem to leave town when they saw what was taking place?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Can you explain why the verse below is in the Bible?

Joh 10:22 And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.
festival of lights. Hanukah.
Matthew 24:15-16 and Luke 21:20-21 are clearly parallel accounts, because we have the exact same warning to flee from Judea to the mountains in the second verse of each Gospel.
But that is not ALL that is in Matthew 24 following the instructions to flee.

21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

Then Luke 21:34-36

34 And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.

35 For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.

36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.

Did 70 ad come like a snare? On all them that dwell on the face of the WHOLE earth?
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Have you considered when God broke off the unbelieving Jews from Israel in Romans 11, the only Israel remaining was spiritual Israel who followed Jesus.
The tree is not Israel, but a tree of life.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Are you saying there were no converts to Christ in Jerusalem to leave town when they saw what was taking place?
James makes a good point. In Matthew 24:15 the instructions to flee are when they see the abomination of desolation standing in a holy place. That is different from the instructions to flee when they see armies surrounding Jerusalem.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
James makes a good point. In Matthew 24:15 the instructions to flee are when they see the abomination of desolation standing in a holy place. That is different from the instructions to flee when they see armies surrounding Jerusalem.
It's all the same. Proven by their reactions to Christ's words.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The tree is not Israel, but the tree of life.
It is Israel. Read it again. God removed unbelievers from Israel leaving only believers in Christ. The broken off will be reattached through faith in Christ.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
It's all the same. Proven by their reactions to Christ's words.
How so Dave? The armies would have surrounded Jerusalem first. That would have been the signal to flee.

Any desecration of the temple would have come after the Romans had killed the huge number who did not flee. Which would have meant fleeing at that point, after the Romans had slaughtered the Jews, would not make any sense.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
How so Dave? The armies would have surrounded Jerusalem first. That would have been the signal to flee.

Any desecration of the temple would have come after the Romans had killed the huge number who did not flee. Which would have meant fleeing at that point, after the Romans had slaughtered the Jews, would not make any sense.

The dispensational confusion arises because of its association of the "abomination of desolation" in Matthew with the appearance in the temple of a defiling idol or object.

The "abomination of desolation" is in fact as seen in Luke's parallel clarifying description in Luke 21:20: The occupation of the holy city of Jerusalem by the abomination represented by the invading pagan Roman army.

There is no mention of the temple or any object within the temple.

The parallel accounts in the gospels are fully complementary.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It may be a topic for discussion on historic commentators. But all that is irrelevant as far as what the bible says. Find one that talks about Daniel 12:4, who can prove his generation fit - many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased, as compared to the internet age.

Anyone who cannot comprehend that the abomination of desolation that Daniel the prophet spoke of in Daniel 12 is end times, has no understanding of Matthew 24.

It is EASY to see that there are two different time periods involved - right from the text.

Luke 21:20-21 is first century history Jerusalem....while, differently, Matthew 24:15-16 is end times the great tribulation involving the entire world, not just Jerusalem.

The cited brethren all disagree, and they collectively represent the prevailing belief of the historical true Christian Church for over eighteen hundred years.

That can certainly not be described as "irrelevant".
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How so Dave? The armies would have surrounded Jerusalem first. That would have been the signal to flee.

Any desecration of the temple would have come after the Romans had killed the huge number who did not flee. Which would have meant fleeing at that point, after the Romans had slaughtered the Jews, would not make any sense.
““But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near. Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. Those who are inside the city must depart. Those who are out in the country must not enter it,” (Luke 21:20–21)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The cited brethren all disagree, and they collectively represent the prevailing belief of the historical true Christian Church for over eighteen hundred years.

That can certainly not be described as "irrelevant".
They are irrelevant. Understanding of Daniel 12, in the text has been sealed from understanding until the end times.

4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

I have translated the meaning of that for you.... internet age.

It is EASY to see that there are two different time periods involved - right from the text.

Luke 21:20-21 is first century history Jerusalem....while, differently, Matthew 24:15-16 is end times the great tribulation involving the entire world, not just Jerusalem.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
““But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near. Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. Those who are inside the city must depart. Those who are out in the country must not enter it,” (Luke 21:20–21)
Why is the instructions to flee to the mountains in Luke 21:21 before the being lead away
captive to ALL nations.... while differently in Matthew 24:15-16, the instructions to flee is after the gospel has been preached to ALL nations?
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
They are irrelevant.

Spoken like a genuine dispensationalist, even though you don't classify yourself as one.

In Matthew 24, Jesus does answer the disciples' questions regarding the end of the age, and His second coming.

But the answer to the latter does not begin until Matthew 24:30 at the earliest.

Up to that point, Jesus' answer relates to the end of the age in 70 AD.

There is no question, as our cited brethren recognized, that the discourse up to Matthew 24:16 (and Luke 21:21) has been historically fulfilled.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why is the instructions to flee to the mountains in Luke 21:21 before the being lead away
captive to ALL nations.... while differently in Matthew 24:15-16, the instructions to flee is after the gospel has been preached to ALL nations?
I'm not sure I understand your question. Jesus told believers to flee when they saw the armies surrounding Jerusalem. The Jews being led captive is a result of unbelievers remaining in the siege of Jerusalem and surviving it only to suffer from then until now.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,609
2,107
Texas
✟204,831.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But - but- but- didn't you realize that Esther describes Russia, Western Europe, and all the nations of the middle east uniting to invade Israel? And don't worry yourself about the fact that Israel had not been brought back from the sword and settled peacefully in the mountains of Israel at the time of Esther.


IMO one that sees Ezekiel 38 and 39 fitting Esther to a tee, it speaks volumes of their reading comprehension involving that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Biblewriter
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,609
2,107
Texas
✟204,831.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Spoken like a genuine dispensationalist, even though you don't classify yourself as one.

In Matthew 24, Jesus does answer the disciples' questions regarding the end of the age, and His second coming.

But the answer to the latter does not begin until Matthew 24:30 at the earliest.

Up to that point, Jesus' answer relates to the end of the age in 70 AD.

There is no question, as our cited brethren recognized, that the discourse up to Matthew 24:16 (and Luke 21:21) has been historically fulfilled.


There was no AOD in the first century involving the temple. The temple wasn't even holy anymore once Christ died and resurrected. The text indicates the AOD involves the holy place. The text indicates---standing where it ought not, and that one should consult the book of Daniel in order to further shed light on Jesus' meaning here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keras and jgr
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
30,001
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I'm not sure I understand your question. Jesus told believers to flee when they saw the armies surrounding Jerusalem. The Jews being led captive is a result of unbelievers remaining in the siege of Jerusalem and surviving it only to suffer from then until now.
The point being, Dave, is that the instructions to flee in Luke 21:20-21 applied to 70 AD, before the Jews were scattered around the world, which everyone has witnessed.

During that same time, the gospel has been spread to the nations. And afterward, the Jews have returned to land of Israel, and have gained possession of Jerusalem again in the parable of the fig tree.

The instruction to flee in Matthew 24:15-16 apply to the end times generation, as that is when the abomination of desolation is referred to in Daniel 12.

It is EASY to see that Luke 21:20-21, applied to a generation involving Jerusalem only. While, differently, Matthew 24:15-16 involves the whole world not just Jerusalem.
 
Upvote 0