My goal has always been to find arguments that do not undercut either the Bible or Ellen White - and that are not simply "feelings based".
So far the best we have to date is that "Ernie said he lied about Candace" which we all agree is a rock solid argument against the dreams.
My interest however is to "also find" a really good Bible argument against the dreams that would not need a glaring "I was lying" statement from Ernie to be compelling.
That project remains.
in Christ,
Bob
As you noted, in two cases, Ellen Whites testifies to not being able to discern a false prophet from a true one until divine intervention. But what does this mean? One of criteria for a false prophet is if they speak not according to the word. We can put this into practice by listening on a case-by-case basis, and accepting what he/she says as long as it continues to be truth. The moment it becomes error, then we know to disregard.
However, this is not a one fix all solution. The question becomes what if the so called prophet makes a life changing suggestion. A life changing suggestion in this example could be anything from packing your bags to leave your home to a request to drop your career to work on his/her ministry. Very scary suggestions especially if the person is not from God.
In the case of Ernie, he did not go this far as far as I know, but if he did, how many would have heeded his words? Satan will definitely learn off this experience, so we had better learn too, quickly.
Another argument from some Adventist is that Ellen is the last prophet, making Ellen the antitype to Moses. However, the obvious con of categorically calling her the last prophet is rejecting true prophecy when it shows up. So therefore, is there a surer way to resolve this?
We know that scripture is plain. With Ellen White, everything was document and verified by many witnesses. We know how she spoke. We know of her fruits. With that said, lets break down Ernie Knolls claims.
circumstances under which they are given -- What makes these different from other dreams is three things. 1. Each dream was as clear as if my eyes were wide open on a bright sunny day. 2. In each dream I could hear distinct things. 3. I had the acute sense of smell. -- After the second dream of heaven I was healed by God of acute ulcerative colitis. Without the healing I would not be able to share these dreams as I have been. I praise God for His incredible mercy and love.
On his third point, we read that he was healed "by God of acute ulcerative colitis." Was there medical evidence of this? Was any medical documentation provided to the public to support this claim? Is it reasonable to request such evidence? If he could not provide the evidence, would this have stopped him in his tracks? Lets just focus on these thoughts and then we can continue.
Discuss..