This won't be long.
First, Ernie has gone far too far to be evaluated as a confused dreamer -- someone that has common dreams and mistakes them for divine pictures. His two-way conversations and the reactionary nature of the dreams brand him as one of three: Either a true prophet, or one in communion with evil spirits, or one hired to confuse the workers with outright lies.
Second, big issues in the dreams eliminate the "true prophet" option. His relation to impressions of the "Spirit", his false tests of "Do you know my name?" and of "What of 1Jo 4:1-3?", his contradiction of the Testimonies on tithe, his mixing of the sacred and the common, and more, his mixing of Biblical metaphors, these and other major issues leave me no choice but to consider him false -- whether in cahoots with demons or merely men.
Third, his most important paragraph in any dream, perhaps, was the statement that many like him in other places, and speaking other languages, are having the same experience. May God, our Father in heaven, prepare us for the tidal wave of sensational fanatical outpouring. It is time to search our hearts, almost too late if we have been neglecting this work.
Fourth, future claimants to inspiration may not have the "big issues" apparent in anything they say. We must not be hurried into accepting any message "heaven." We have time to study, time to watch. Little things may be our only clue to wait longer still. We can not be too careful how we hear, how we receive.
Fifth, we should not test spirits by talking to them, nor by listening to them talk. Think it through. Satan was a liar from a very early date.
Sixth, see the second point. I am through with
Messages from God for His People. The devil has no right to distract me from my work by making up new and confusing dreams. I grant that he is able. But not that he has the right. I will not be further distracted.
