• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

End Time Deceptions

Copperhead

Newbie
Site Supporter
Feb 22, 2013
1,434
442
✟253,325.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Rev 12:11  And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. 

.

You really have to look at all of Revelation 12.

Early on, the woman (Israel) is giving birth. It would seem that is the ekklesia and not the Messiah specifically. Yeshua was never forcibly snatched up (harpazo) like this child is, at either His birth or His ascension. And the child is to rule with a rod of iron would imply the Messiah, but in Rev 2:26-27, all those believers that overcome will be ruling with a rod of iron with Messiah. The ekklesia was conceived in Jerusalem at Shavuot (Pentacost). In Revelation 12, it is being born and is forcibly caught up to the throne of God. Yeshua is the head, the ekklesia is the body.

Many Tanakh passages support that early in the birth pains of the Tribulation period (per Jeremiah 30) there is a birth. Isaiah 66 supports this as well.

After that happens, the dragon persues the woman out of anger that he didn't consume the child who was born. And it is her later children that are in view as overcoming, Rev 12:17. That would be those who come to faith during the Tribulation period when the woman is pursued. It specifically says this occurs after she had given birth. It is those offspring of hers after that birth that overcome. You shouldn't cherry pick a verse and shoe horn it in to fit a presuppostion.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟938,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You shouldn't cherry pick a verse and shoe horn it in to fit a presuppostion.

Are you going to tell us that those "under the blood of the Lamb" in Revelation 12:11 are not members of the New Covenant Church ?

The Capitol "C" Church as we use the term today is not found in the entire Book of Revelation.
Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found.


.
 
Upvote 0

HenryM

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2016
616
226
ZXC
✟47,716.00
Country
Bangladesh
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Keras should be careful with changing and inserting words and posting it as scripture, that are not there, to support own particular view. Just a cautionary note.

Steamrollers, exalting themselves as Bereans, don't seem to care much about such things.
 
Upvote 0

HenryM

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2016
616
226
ZXC
✟47,716.00
Country
Bangladesh
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Here's some of my list of deceptions that serve as preparation for final end time deception:

- evolution (life just happened, by chance)
- vast universe, Earth spinning and spiraling through space, heliocentricity, aliens, etc... (we are just a speck of swirling insignificance in cold dark empty and huge vacuum)
- billions of years old Earth (as far as removed from start of creation as possible)
- literary arts and philosophy, most "great" writers in the last 4-5 centuries at least (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- practically all modern music, television and cinema (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- all those isms: communism, socialism, humanism, secularism, capitalism, feminism... (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- public/corporate education (not really about educating), mainstream media (not really about what's going on), politics and governance (not really about working for people's best interests)
- wolf-in-sheep-clothings avenues, from major denominations to smaller groups, internet sites and forums, etc that pretend to be Christian but are hostile to Christian truths

Basically it's everywhere. And it's not even end time grand deception.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Copperhead

Newbie
Site Supporter
Feb 22, 2013
1,434
442
✟253,325.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Are you going to tell us that those "under the blood of the Lamb" in Revelation 12:11 are not members of the New Covenant Church ?

The Capitol "C" Church as we use the term today is not found in the entire Book of Revelation.
Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found.


.

Where is the ekklesia mentioned after Revelation 4? So yes, those later children of the woman, though they are redeemed by the blood of the lamb just like the OT saints are, are not the ekklesia that we are now. Those "churches" in Rev 2 and 3 are called the ekklesia. They are not some sort of individual thing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟938,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Where is the ekklesia mentioned after Revelation 4? So yes, those later children of the woman, though they are redeemed by the blood of the lamb just like the OT saints are, are not the ekklesia that we are now. Those "churches" in Rev 2 and 3 are called the ekklesia. They are not some sort of individual thing.

The New Covenant Church of Christ cannot end before the Second Coming of Christ, because the New Covenant is "everlasting".

Heb 13:20  Now may the God of peace who brought up our Lord Jesus from the dead, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, 



God is not going back to an "obsolete" covenant during a future time.

Heb 8:13  In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. 

.
 
Upvote 0

Copperhead

Newbie
Site Supporter
Feb 22, 2013
1,434
442
✟253,325.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
The same blood of the New Covenant is the same. The OT saints looked forward to it. The Ekklesia is a product of it. And the future Tribulation saints will be saved by it.

The Ekklesia is not the New Covenant. There is no mention that the Ekklesia as the “church” is the New Covenant. The New Covenant per Jeremiah 31:31 is not the Ekklesia. The Ekklesia is a current product of it. Paul was definitive that the Ekklesia or “church” was a mystery, Eph 5:32, which is a unique relationship likened to Messiah and His bride.

One has to keep in mind who Hebrews was written to... Hebrews! The letter is pure apologetic directed at Hebrews to convince them of the legitimacy of Yeshua as the Messiah promised. Hebrews 3:1 is asking these Hebrews to consider Yeshua. Asking those that already believe to consider Yeshua is like asking someone already married to consider marriage. It makes no sense. And if they were already believers, why would the author need to spend so much ink explaining how Yeshua is greater than Abraham, Moses, temple, priesthood, angels, etc. That seems absurd.
 
Upvote 0

Oldmantook

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2017
3,633
1,526
66
USA
✟114,173.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Here's some of my list of deceptions that serve as preparation for final end time deception:

- evolution (life just happened, by chance)
- vast universe, Earth spinning and spiraling through space, heliocentricity, aliens, etc... (we are just a speck of swirling insignificance in cold dark empty and huge vacuum)
- billions of years old Earth (as far as removed from start of creation as possible)
- literary arts and philosophy, most "great" writers in the last 4-5 centuries at least (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- practically all modern music, television and cinema (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- all those isms: communism, socialism, humanism, secularism, capitalism, feminism... (no God and Jesus Christ there)
- public/corporate education (not really about educating), mainstream media (not really about what's going on), politics and governance (not really about working for people's best interests)
- wolf-in-sheep-clothings avenues, from major denominations to smaller groups, internet sites and forums, etc that pretend to be Christian but are hostile to Christian truths

Basically it's everywhere. And it's not even end time grand deception.
I like your point #2. The deception began back when Copernicus advanced his theory of a spinning globe earth rotating around the sun. The Bible on the other hand, describes a geocentric view of our world where the earth is a flat disc and stationary and the sun moves over it. Moreover the Hebrew conception of the earth is that it is covered by a dome - the "firmament" described in Genesis 1. If these things are true, then we have a popular view today that we have or will be visited by aliens (who are in reality demons) to deceive even the elect. If the Hebrew view is correct however, then space travel is impossible since the earth is covered by a impenetrable dome and no aliens can travel to earth (though demons of course can travel inter-dimensionally). If the church stuck to the biblical narrative instead of going along with the scientific narrative, then she will not be deceived but unfortunately the church acts and thinks like the world.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HenryM
Upvote 0

The Times

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2017
2,581
805
Australia
✟105,181.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
In 1968 Eric von Daniken wrote a book called Chariots of the Gods suggesting that ancient astronauts visited earth to “seed” our planet and constructed monuments which exist even today. Many Bible scholars believe these ancient monuments ,including the Great Pyramid of Giza were built by the fallen angels before the Flood.

The belief that our Creator comes from the stars rather than being the One who made them is one of the great deceptions of the end times.

“And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie.” (2 Thessalonians 2:11)

Just what is this “strong delusion” mentioned in this Scripture? Many Bible prophecy commentators believe it refers to the UFO phenomenon and that extraterrestrials will play a role in the end times as fallen angels masquerading as “space brothers.”

The description of “signs in the heavens” during the last days is believed by some to be pointing to the UFO phenomenon and has given rise to what the Bible describes as “doctrines of demons” (I Timothy 4:1-4).

“Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken.” (Luke 21:26)

“Things which are coming on the earth” could imply things that are not of this earth but of an extraterrestrial nature. A recent poll conducted by the Huffington Post revealed that more people living in the UK believe in extraterrestrials than those who believe in God.

There is a curious Scripture in Daniel 2:43 which says “they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men.” “They” seems to refer to beings that are not of the seed of men. In the sixth chapter of Genesis we are told fallen angels bred with the women of earth creating a race of giants known as the Nephilim.

In the days of Noah the Nephilim practiced genetic interference mixing the DNA of humans and animals to create “chimera” or monstrosities. These creatures were an abomination to God so He destroyed them in the Flood along with the Nephilim.

The Obama Administration – through the National Institute of Health – proposed a new policy to allow scientists to use federal funding to create part-human, part-animal embryos known as “chimera.” Last year the Pope gave his blessing to mix human and animal DNA to create chimera for the sake of medical research.

“And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of Man.” (Luke 17:26)

Combining human stem calls with animal embryos to create a new life form that is part-human, part-animal is an example of man playing God. “We’re not trying to make a chimera just because we want to see some kind of monstrous creature,” said Pablo Ross, a reproductive biologist at the University of California.

But many are concerned and have raised questions that chimera research could end up producing animals with human brains or animals able to father human children. Experiments involving the brain as well as giving animals human sperm and eggs are being planned by the National Institutes of Health.

It all began in the Garden of Eden when Satan told Adam and Eve, “Ye shall be as gods” (Genesis 3:5). There are reports that Nephilim DNA has been recovered from bodies frozen in Antarctica, Iraq and other locations around the world. Some researchers believe there are secret projects using Nephilim DNA for interspecies breeding. So when we read the Scripture, “And as it was in the days of Noah . . .” we are eerily reminded of the mischief of Genesis chapter six and the lateness of the hour.

There was a time – not too long ago – when such things were considered the fantasies of science fiction, but these shocking experiments have become a reality. When Nimrod began construction on the Tower of Babel God said, “Nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do” (Genesis 11:6) which translates to “Nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them.” So God gave them different languages in order to confuse them which halted the construction.

And how does God plan to avenge the altering of His creations today? This time the Flood will come as the Tribulation after God removes His faithful from the earth at the Rapture.

By: Gregg May


Quasar92

I agree that God removes them using the Holy Angels, but the real question is HOW, WHERE AND WHY he removes them?

The HOW, WHERE AND WHY are more important than the WHEN he removes them. Because the WHEN would be at God's choosing and so the HOW, WHERE AND WHY we can know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swan7
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟938,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One has to keep in mind who Hebrews was written to... Hebrews!

Yes. Hebrew members of the New Covenant Church.
The Apostles were Hebrews and so was Jesus.


Try to ignore 2 Corinthians 3:6 if you can, since it is addressed to a mainly Gentile church body.


Jer_31:31  "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—


Mat_26:28  For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.



Mar_14:24  And He said to them, "This is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many



Luk_22:20  Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.



1Co_11:25  In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me."



2Co_3:6  who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.



Heb_8:8  Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—



Heb_8:13  In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.



Heb_9:15  And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.



Heb_12:24  to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.


NKJV
.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
16,147
2,699
84
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟383,377.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Alluding to the teachings of Jeremiah against the Israeli false prophets who deny the invasion of Babylon, has nothing whatever to do with the Biblical teaching of the coming pre-trib rapture of the Church, by Jesus, Matthew, Luke, John and Paul, as documented in the our post link below. Either field your Scriptually based argument refuting any part of it, or it thoroughly refutes the opinions your views are based on, and you are the one who turns out to be the false prophet.
Quasar, I am very concerned for you. What you teach and promote is not found in the Bible.
I have looked at your supposed Scriptural support and none of them actually say the God intends to take the Church to heaven. In fact what Jesus and the Apostles teach is the opposite of that idea; we must face trials and tribulations and endure until the end. Which means death for many Christians, just as is happening now and in the past nearly 2000 years. Why should that change for us now?
My suggestion to you is; if you are unable/incapable of giving up the rapture lie, keep on hoping for it, but be ready for it to not happen and most of all cease promoting it, as the Lord will judge more severely those who teach false doctrines. James 3:1
You really should be careful with changing and inserting words and posting it as scripture, that are not there, to support your particular view. Just a cautionary note.
So; which translation has the inerrant Words of God in modern English? Don't tell me that I must learn Hebrew, Greek or 16th century English to read the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Copperhead

Newbie
Site Supporter
Feb 22, 2013
1,434
442
✟253,325.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Yes. Hebrew members of the New Covenant Church.
The Apostles were Hebrews and so was Jesus.

Wrong, Hebrews that might have been familiar with the new sect of Christianity, but not established believers. Re-read Acts 28:17 to the end of the chapter and you will see a clear example of what was going on. Just like the author did in Hebrews, Paul calls these Jewish leaders in Acts, brethren. It is clear in the text that they are not believers. Just like Christians can call each other brethren, Jews call each other brethren. They were part of the heavenly calling of Abraham and part of the Abrahamic Covenant. Exodus 19:6, the Hebrews are called a Holy Nation, so even under the Mosaic Covenant they are a Holy people. So it likewise is stated in Hebrews by the author calling them Holy Brethren, even though they are not believers.

At this point in history, Christianity was still viewed as a sect of Judaism by both believers and unbelieving Jews. I have been convinced for some time that Paul was the author of Hebrews because of the style of the letter and the fact that he was deeply motivated to have his Jewish brethren come to faith in Messiah. But his main purpose was to the Gentiles. And the animosity that happened in Jerusalem probably was the reason that Paul didn't sign off on the letter as was his usual style. He wanted an unbiased audience with the Hebrew readers to make the apologetic case for Yeshua being the promised Messiah.

As I stated before, it would not make any sense to explain to believers how Yeshua is greater than Abraham, Moses, priesthood, angels, etc to such the extent as was done in the book of Hebrews. And the author specifically asks the readers to consider the case for Yeshua being the promised Messiah. if they are already believers that wouldn't make any sense. That is like trying to convince someone already married to consider marriage.

None of your scripture references negate what I am contending. Yes, there is a New Covenant as per Jeremiah 31, but that doesn't mean all Hebrews are part of that New Covenant. Paul makes that specifically clear in Romans 9, 10, 11 where he hammers away that not all Hebrews are saved, but also that God is not done with the Hebrews yet. Always keep in mind, gentiles are grafted in. And in either case, the Ekklesia, or called out believers, is a product of the New Covenant, not what the New Covenant is. The New Covenant is made with the House of Judah and house of Israel per Jeremiah 31. Just like not all Hebrews were saved under the Mosaic Covenant, not all Hebrews will come to faith and be saved under the New Covenant. The New Covenant will be fully realized in the Millennial Kingdom when national Israel finally obtains all the promises given to Abraham. It has never fully enjoyed those promises since they were given to Abraham. For one, Israel never possessed all the land that was promised, so it has yet to be fulfilled. The New Covenant, just like the Mosaic Covenant, is a national covenant.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Swan7
Upvote 0

Copperhead

Newbie
Site Supporter
Feb 22, 2013
1,434
442
✟253,325.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
So; which translation has the inerrant Words of God in modern English? Don't tell me that I must learn 16th century English to read the Bible.

Honestly, I didn't look at all extant English translations for what was said in Jeremiah 14, but those, from the KJV on up thru the newer translations that I did, they say prophets, not teachers and pastors as you did. You did insert your own rendition of what you wanted the text to say. The text specifically talks about prophesying by these prophets. A teacher is teaching, not prophesying. A pastor, likewise. I have yet to hear or read any of the teachers you are denigrating use such words as "thus says the Lord" when they are teaching as if they claim to be prophesying. They make their case for what they are espousing, yes. But that is not prophesying. It is expositional commentary.

While maybe not intentional, your choice of words were loaded to elicit a charged, biased accusation. I politely suggested you might want to be cautious in substituting words of scripture with your own that are not in the scripture passage, and passing them off to the reader as if they are actual scripture. Instead of firing off at me about it, you should be introspective on your approach. It is hardly in keeping with loving rebuke of brethren. You are well within your sovereignty to disagree, but you are outside your pay grade by the accusations and condemnation you are making.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Swan7
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟867,647.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
For one, Israel never possessed all the land that was promised, so it has yet to be fulfilled.
Joshua 21:43
And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
 
Upvote 0

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
102
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟377,574.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Quasar, I am very concerned for you. What you teach and promote is not found in the Bible.
I have looked at your supposed Scriptural support and none of them actually say the God intends to take the Church to heaven. In fact what Jesus and the Apostles teach is the opposite of that idea; we must face trials and tribulations and endure until the end. Which means death for many Christians, just as is happening now and in the past nearly 2000 years. Why should that change for us now?
My suggestion to you is; if you are unable/incapable of giving up the rapture lie, keep on hoping for it, but be ready for it to not happen and most of all cease promoting it, as the Lord will judge more severely those who teach false doctrines. James 3:1

So; which translation has the inerrant Words of God in modern English? Don't tell me that I must learn 16th century English to read the Bible.


I suggest you mind your own kitchen, from where you have been concoctng fiction into the Scriptures. In the second place, the following Biblical Scripture teaching the pre-trib rapture of the Church are the Biblical passages my views come from, you falsely claim, do not. Tell me, which of these are not Biblical passages?

The Biblical teaching of the pre-trib rapture of the Church:

Beginning with Mt.24:31:

And He will send His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His ELECT from the four winds [Israel - on earth], from one end of the heavens to the other [The Church Jesus will rapture before the seven year tribulation begins]. How did those ELECT get into heaven? Read on to find out.

Lk.21:36:
"Watch ye, therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man."

Jn.14:2-4 and 28:
"In my Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you [See Jn.20:17]. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. You know the way to the place where I am going." [Jn.14:2-4].

"You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." [Jn.14:28].

The Scriptures tell us where we all go, who belong to Christ, after the death of our bodies:
"We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord." As recorded in 2 Cor.5:8, confirming Ecc.12:7. Which is, in and of itself, conclusive to the fact that Jesus is not going to let the rest of His Church remain on earth to go through the seven year tribulation, when He returns for those of us who are still alive, waiting for His appearing, in 1 Thes.4:17. Since He raises all those who have died, to be with Him, immediately after their physical death, for more than 2,000 years.

1 Thes.4:13-18:
The Thessalonians were very concerned about those among them who had died, that they would not be gathered together with the rest of them when Jesus returned. Paul assures them in vs 13-14 that they will all be returning with Christ from heaven, where they have been since He raised them up to be with Him, the day they died physically, according to 2 Cor.5:6-8.

"We believe that Jesus died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in Him [Died physically]. Vs 14.

"According to the Lord's own word [Scriptural truth as to the fact that Jesus taught there was to be a pre-trib rapture of the Church, as recorded in Jn.14:2-4 and 28], we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left to the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep." Vs 15. An assurance by Paul to the Thessalonians that the dead in Christ had already been raised from the dead before, and were already with Christ when He returns for all those left on earth alive at His coming.

Because they have already been raised, each in his/her own turn, according to 1 Cor.15:23. That is the very reason it is not documented as a resurrection in the Scriptures.

"For the Lord Himself will come down from heaven [With all His saints [Church], according to vs 14], with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first" [Paul again assures them, as seen in verses 13-14, they were already previously raised once before, each in his/her own turn, as they died, for more than 2,000 years]. Vs 16.

"After that, we who are still alive and are left will be CAUGHT UP [raptured] together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the sky. And so we will be with the Lord forever." Vs 17. Where we proceed with Jesus to our Father in heaven as He promised us in Jn.14:2-4 and 28.

"Therefore encourage each other with these words." Vs 18.

2 Thess.2:1-8:
The precise timing of the rapture of the Church:

"Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to Him, we ask you, brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some prophecy, report or letter supposed to have come from us, saying that the Day of the Lord [The 70th and final Week/seven year tribulation of Dan.9:27] has already come." 2 Thes.2:1-2. Which is a direct reference to 1 Thes.4:17 and the theme of Paul's entire pre-trib rapture message in 2 Thes.2:1-8. When we will be CAUGHT UP TOGETHER WITH THEM IN THE CLOUDS TO MEET THE LORD IN THE AIR. [Parenthetics mine].

The "Day of the Lord" Paul refers to in vs 2, alludes to Dan.9:27, when God will intervene into the affairs of man for the last time, culminating in the second coming of Jesus to the earth. In that passage of Scripture, the Day of the Lord is triggered by the "he" who "confirms a covenant [An agreement] for one Week" [The Day of the Lord/ 70th and final Week/seven year tribulation], who is the antichrist. The second, and same "he," who stops Israel from the offerings and sacrificing in the temple of God, and the third, and same "he," who breaks his covenant in the middle of the Week [After 3.5 of the 7 year total], and sets up the abomination of desolation Jesus referred to in Mt.24:15, in His Olivet Discourse, about the sign of His second coming, and of the end of the age.

In vs 3: "Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for that Day [The Day of the Lord, the 70th and final Week, the seven year tribulation] will not come, until the "apostasia" [Greek term in which the original translation was "to depart," or "departure," meaning, the rapture of the Church] occurs and the man of lawlessness [The antichrist, and all three of the "he's" in Dan.9:27] is revealed [Who triggers the Day of the Lord/ the 70th and final Week/ the seven year tribulation], the man doomed to destruction." Which reveals the "apostasia" [Departure] will take place before the antichrist is revealed, who triggers the 70th Week/seven year tribulation. Confirmed in verses 7 and 8 below.

Translation History of apostasia and discessio: By Thomas Ice, PhD.
The first seven English translations of apostasia all rendered the noun as either " departure" or " departing." They are as follows: Wycliffe Bible (1384); Tyndale Bible (1526); Coverdale Bible (1535); Cranmer Bible (1539); Breeches Bible (1576); Beza Bible (1583); Geneva Bible (1608) . This supports the notion that the word truly means " departure." In fact, Jerome' s Latin translation known as the Vulgate from around the time of 325 A.D. renders apostasia with the " word discessio, meaning ' departure.'Why was the King James Version the first to depart from the established translation of "departure" in 1611 A.D.? [It is more than likely due to overzealous RCC scribes who altered the original wording of vs 3. to accommodate their teachings of Amillenialism, which rejects both the pre-trib rapture of the Church as well as Jesus Millennial reign her on earth].

Theodore Beza, the Swiss reformer was the first to transliterate apostasia and create a new word, rather than translate it as others had done. The translators of the King James Version were the first to introduce the new rendering of apostasia as " falling away." Most English translators have followed the KJV and Beza in departing from translating apostasia as " departure." No reason was ever given.

"He [The antichrist] will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God." Vs 4. [The abomination of desolation, confirming Dan.9:27 and Mt.24:15]. See also 2 Thes.2:4.

The rapture of the Church and verse 3 confirmed:
In vs 7: "For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so until he [The saints - Church] is taken out of the way."

The "he" who will be taken out of the way, is the one body of Christ, who bear the Holy Spirit within each of us [Eph.1:13-14], the Church of Jesus Christ. The very same as those who will participate in the "apostasia," the "departure," [the rapture] of the Church, in vs 3. Immediately following that:

In vs 8: "And then the lawless one [The antichrist] will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of His mouth and destroy by the splendor of His coming." Vs 8. [See Rev.19:17-21].

The antichrist is found in all three of the "he's" in Dan. 9:27, confirmed by Jesus in Mt.24:15; Mk.13:14 and by Paul, in 2 Thes.2:3, 4 and 8.

From the above Scriptural facts, there can be only one proper interpretation for the timing of the rapture of the Church, which will be immediately preceding the 70th and final/7 year tribulation, triggered by the antichrist, all three of the "he's" in Dan.9:27. Seen also as the first of the four horsemen of the apocalypse, riding the white horse, in the first of the seven seals, in Rev.6:2. There is no "pre-wrath" or post-trib rapture taught in the Scriptures.


Other verses pertaining to the rapture of the Church: 1 Thes.1:10; 1 Thes.5:9; Rev.3:10 and Rev.4:1-2. Of the saints [Church] returning with Christ from their marriage in heaven, in Rev.19:7, 8 and 14; Jude 14 and Zech.14:4-5!


The difference between the Second Coming of Christ and the pre-trib rapture of the Church:

http://www.pre-trib.org/data/pdf/Ice...eenTheRapt.pdf


Quasar92
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
102
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟377,574.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Quasar, I am very concerned for you. What you teach and promote is not found in the Bible.
I have looked at your supposed Scriptural support and none of them actually say the God intends to take the Church to heaven. In fact what Jesus and the Apostles teach is the opposite of that idea; we must face trials and tribulations and endure until the end. Which means death for many Christians, just as is happening now and in the past nearly 2000 years. Why should that change for us now?
My suggestion to you is; if you are unable/incapable of giving up the rapture lie, keep on hoping for it, but be ready for it to not happen and most of all cease promoting it, as the Lord will judge more severely those who teach false doctrines. James 3:1

So; which translation has the inerrant Words of God in modern English? Don't tell me that I must learn 16th century English to read the Bible.


Put in another format, the following refutes your false claims:

Scriptural proof for the pre-trib rapture of the Church

The Scriptures are crystal clear where Jesus will meet His Church, in 1 Thess.4:17: "After that, we who are still alive and are left, WILL BE CAUGHT UP TOGETHER with them in the clouds TO MEET THE LORD IN THE AIR. And so we will be with the Lord forever." In the FIRST of His TWO comings, recorded in 1 Thess.4:16, yet to take place, confirming Jn.14:2-3, 28! From where the Church is seen in heaven BEFORE the tribulation begins, in Rev.4:1-2. Where Jesus used John to symbolically represent the Church. Confirming 2 Thess.2:3 and 7-8! Where the Church is seen in heaven later, at the marriage of the Bride/Church to the Lamb/Jesus. While the tribulation is taking place on earth, recorded in Rev.19:7-8. From where Jesus will return to the earth in the SECOND, of His TWO comings, yet to take place, WITH HIS CHURCH, riding white horses, dressed in fine linen, white and clean, in His armies from heaven, recorded in 19:14, confirming Zech.14:4-5 and Acts 1:6; 1:11; 2:29-30 and 15:16! From which the above Scriptures leave no other options!

The difference between the pre-trib rapture of the Church, as delineated above, and the SECOND coming of Jesus are the following facts:

1. Jesus returns to the earth in His second coming, recorded in Zech.14:4-5 and in Acts 1:11.

2. No one meets Jesus in the sky when He returns in His second coming, recorded in Rev.19:14, as they will when He returns for the first time, recorded in 1 Thess.4:16!.

3. Jesus will return from the marriage of the Bride/Church to the Lamb/Jesus, in heaven, in His second coming, to the earth, with His Church, recorded in Rev.19:14, He came for in His first coming, in the clouds of the sky, seven years before, recorded in Jn.14:2-3, 28, 1 Thess.4:16-17 and 2 Thess.2:3 and 7-8.

4. No one returns to the present heaven at Jesus second coming to the earth, because He has come to establish His 1,000 year reign on the throne of David, in the restored kingdom of Israel, as recorded in Acts 1:6; 2:29-30; 15:16; Zech.6:12-13 described in Ez.40-47 and Rev.20:6. In addition to the present heaven and earth being destroyed and will pass away, as recorded in 2 Pet.3:7 and in Rev.21:1.


Quasar92
 
Upvote 0

Swan7

Made in the image of His Grace
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2014
9,172
7,367
Forever Summer
✟484,475.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hmm... I'm not trying to derail the thread by any means, I just want to ask this:

has anyone read about the War of the Jews concerning Matthew 24 where Jesus warns His flock about the coming (what I believe to be) the Tribulation in their time? Wouldn't this fit when Jesus says the coming of the Son of Man is like the days of Noah and the days of Lot?
(Luke 17)

The point I'm asking is wouldn't that count as a type of rapture? A calling out of His people from certain destruction?
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Toro
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟867,647.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Translation History of apostasia and discessio: By Thomas Ice, PhD.
The first seven English translations of apostasia all rendered the noun as either " departure" or " departing." They are as follows: Wycliffe Bible (1384); Tyndale Bible (1526); Coverdale Bible (1535); Cranmer Bible (1539); Breeches Bible (1576); Beza Bible (1583); Geneva Bible (1608) . This supports the notion that the word truly means " departure." In fact, Jerome' s Latin translation known as the Vulgate from around the time of 325 A.D. renders apostasia with the " word discessio, meaning ' departure.'Why was the King James Version the first to depart from the established translation of "departure" in 1611 A.D.? [It is more than likely due to overzealous RCC scribes who altered the original wording of vs 3. to accommodate their teachings of Amillenialism, which rejects both the pre-trib rapture of the Church as well as Jesus Millennial reign her on earth].

Theodore Beza, the Swiss reformer was the first to transliterate apostasia and create a new word, rather than translate it as others had done. The translators of the King James Version were the first to introduce the new rendering of apostasia as " falling away." Most English translators have followed the KJV and Beza in departing from translating apostasia as " departure." No reason was ever given.
Debunked.

The Reformers recognized that the papal antichrist was in power. The papacy had apostasized and departed from the truth.

And the Reformers knew that they were still "unraptured." In reality, they knew nothing of a rapture.
 
Upvote 0

Quasar92

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 7, 2016
3,762
1,943
102
Lexington, KY 40517
Visit site
✟377,574.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hmm... I'm not trying to derail the thread by any means, I just want to ask this:

has anyone read about the War of the Jews concerning Matthew 24 where Jesus warns His flock about the coming (what I believe to be) the Tribulation in their time? Wouldn't this fit when Jesus says the coming of the Son of Man is like the days of Noah and the days of Lot?
(Luke 17)

The point I'm asking is wouldn't that count as a type of rapture? A calling out of His people from certain destruction?


Jesus Olivet Discourse in Mt.24; Mk.13 and Lk.21 is prophecy, basically the final 3.5 years of the 7 year tribulation. Culminating in Jesus second coming, recorded in Mt.24:30-31. It is not past history.


Quasar92
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟867,647.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Hmm... I'm not trying to derail the thread by any means, I just want to ask this:

has anyone read about the War of the Jews concerning Matthew 24 where Jesus warns His flock about the coming (what I believe to be) the Tribulation in their time? Wouldn't this fit when Jesus says the coming of the Son of Man is like the days of Noah and the days of Lot?
(Luke 17)

The point I'm asking is wouldn't that count as a type of rapture? A calling out of His people from certain destruction?
In response to Jesus' forewarning in Matthew 24:16, all of the Judean Christians escaped prior to the encirclement and destruction by the Roman armies. It certainly qualifies as divine deliverance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swan7
Upvote 0