Dragons in the Bible. Do you believe they are real or a myth?

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,580
6,064
EST
✟993,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
.
Not really, I posted on that aspect of this conversation in the beginning of this thread, but you apparently missed it.
Oh and Unicorns are in the Bible also
.
Most versions including the 1917 Jewish Publication Society English translation and the 225 BC LXX translate the word translated "unicorn" as "wild ox."
 
Reactions: JIMINZ
Upvote 0

gordonhooker

Franciscan tssf
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2012
1,883
1,045
Wellington Point, QLD
Visit site
✟274,602.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Most versions including the 1917 Jewish Publication Society English translation and the 225 BC LXX translate the word translated "unicorn" as "wild ox."

Don't tell the KJV onlyists that though
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟84,598.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I believe dragons mentioned in the Bible like the Leviathan in Job is a real creature. .....What do you say?
Yes - I believe they were real creatures.

But then (as a believer in a young earth) I believe all kinds of creatures walked the earth, swam in the sea, and flew in the air at the same time man existed which are extinct now.

I believe that that includes dinosaurs, pterodactyls, plesiosaurs and the like.

Many creatures perhaps were not able to long cope with the earth as they found it after the flood and quickly died out - perhaps even a few days after leaving the ark from starvation.

Perhaps the "serpent" in the garden was quite a bit different than serpents are now that they have been cursed to crawl on the ground by God. Perhaps that old "dragon" even had wings in the original form of the serpent.

We just don't know these things for sure. But those are the kinds of things I believe are a possibility.

I put watching videos of the earth, the animals, and the civilizations prior to the flood near the top of things I want God to show me.
 
Upvote 0

Dan the deacon

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2018
823
386
65
Perry
✟28,197.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And just where do we suppose people of a different region who have not read the book of Job came up with this idea. Perhaps it is simply the truth. We do not actually know when Job lived. Perhaps pre-flood. The creature is being spoken of by God so saying it is a myth is saying God speaks untruthes.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
As usual your exposition is careless and your retort utterly unprovoked. I was just pitching into to what had the promise of an interesting thread. The immediate context it could be a crocodile or some other fearsome predator. What I was pointing out was the term was often used to speak of sea monsters. As far as it representing evil that's largely a matter of interpretation so don't scold me like a child, I don't appreciate the condescending tone. I never said this was a myth, only that the image was mythic, Phonecians were a sea faring people and their myths often included mythic monsters.

Once the dragon refers to Satan, once the Leviathan is specifically Pharoah. Maybe you think God is talking about a crocodile, its certainly consistant with the context and probably makes more sense then a fire breathing dragon. The commentary Ive seen over the years generally say rousing the leviathan is invoking a curse, I've seen it several times. I think the admonition here is to avoid it giving the over all context of the use of the term in Job. But if you want to jump to pedantic conclusions and torture the text to fit your preconceived notions fine, but your missing out on a vintage Hebrew literary feature.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: JIMINZ
Upvote 0

Jude1:3Contendforthefaith

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2017
3,779
2,856
Arizona
✟530,314.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Leviathan Is Satan:



In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword Shall Punish Leviathan The Piercing Serpent, even Leviathan that crooked Serpent; and he shall Slay The Dragon that is in the sea.
• Isaiah 27:1



Can you draw out Leviathan with a hook,
Or snare his tongue with a line which you lower?
put a reed through his nose,
Or pierce his jaw with a hook?
Will he make many supplications to you?
Will he speak softly to you?

Will he Make A Covenant With you?
Will you take him as a servant forever?

• Job 41:1-4
 
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
They are symbolic or metaphorical to a spirit, or spirits...

God Bless!
 
Reactions: JIMINZ
Upvote 0

gordonhooker

Franciscan tssf
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2012
1,883
1,045
Wellington Point, QLD
Visit site
✟274,602.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
.
Hey, I resemble that remark.

You had me there for a moment I had a little trouble working out what the emoticon was it looks a toss-up between a crazy unicorn and a human helicopter......
 
Reactions: JIMINZ
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
The sea is symbolic of something as well...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Thats the concensus, it fits the narrative perfectly. Job wants to know why God is doing this to him, little did he know God had been bragging about him. In the context of Job it might be a crockodile, it depends on how you, 'rouse the leviathan'.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,513
7,861
...
✟1,195,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
O bother - now I am sorry I responded even though it was an attempt at humour....

You believe it is humorous that the word "unicorns" is used in some translations. I do not find that humorous, my friend. I believe "unicorns" is the correct rendering in our Bibles but the word "unicorns" is not talking about the horse with one horn (even though you will see them pictured in history), but the Bible is talking about the extinct auroch (large cattle) with one horn. Scientists have brought back a certain breed of extinct auroch that does not have one horn. But the Bible describes this unicorn as like a super huge cow or bull like animal.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bruce Carr

Member
Feb 1, 2017
22
12
55
Earth, Texas
✟18,824.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes; created on the same day as man-Adam, two days after the sun; living together with men since that time; vegetarian until the fall and flood. Job knew of them; most world nations have tradition of dragons and men interacting; there is no such thing as 'prehistoric' in the sense of evolution and millions of years.
It is scriptural; it is true. Some folks in the Congo say they have seen similar creatures to this day; + Lochness etc.

https://creation.com/behemoth-and-leviathan

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/could-behemoth-have-been-a-dinosaur/

https://www.gotquestions.org/creation-days.html
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,513
7,861
...
✟1,195,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Probably because like Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs etc. Job is among the books that are classed as poetry, prose, and wisdom literature. They are used to provide a message not necessarily a historical event.

I am just reading the text plainly and believing it. I am not making any assumptions that something is not true because it is beyond my imagination.

God's Word is truth.

"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." (John 17:17).

God's Word is not based on myths or lies or fantasies.

Yes, the Bible uses lots of metaphors, but those metaphors are based upon something that is real or true.

Also, while it is true that Job is listed among the Poetic books, it is not technically poetry like we would understand it today. The book of Job is describing a real life story of a man and his up close experience with God after he had suffered greatly. You cannot right it off as fiction, my friend. Nowhere does the story itself suggest that it is fiction.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,513
7,861
...
✟1,195,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Job is regarded as one of the oldest books in our Biblical canon and is dated to 1000 BC or earlier. At that time in human history literacy was limited to probably no more than 5% of the population --- the very rich and powerful classes.

We cannot make assumptions about the past. Even man made history can be corrupted to color our thinking of how things might have been. I trust God's Word. Man made history is untrustworthy in my opinion. If man made history happens to line up with the Bible, then that is great. But to put my trust in men who can lie is not where I place my trust. It is God and what He says. Everything God says is true and that would include even the dragons and unicorns mentioned in His Word. For with God, nothing is impossible. I mean, the very fact that a person believes in an all powerful supreme being means He can do anything.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,567
New Jersey
✟1,149,208.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
In my view, Job uses a traditional story as a framework for a reflection on evil and suffering. We have a fairly brief story at the beginning, told as a straight narrative, a long poetic book, and then a brief conclusion. If anything is historical (which I doubt) it would be the narrative, certainly the introduction and maybe even the conclusion. There's no reason to think that the images in the poetry have to be literal.

Since I don't think God actually lets Satan torment people to win a bet, I assume the narrative is a traditional story and not a history. But that doesn't really affect the status of the poetic section. Even if you believe in Biblical inerrancy, it doesn't mean that the whole Bible has to be history. There can be various forms of literature in it. Another example is Jonah, which is an obvious satire.
 
Reactions: JackRT
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AnnaDeborah

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2018
565
701
private
✟30,123.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
As for the beast of the Earth in Job: Which verse are you referring to?
Is this referring to Behemoth in Job 40?


I'd argue that Leviathan is a description of a physical creature. If you ignore the chapter divisions, the description of Leviathan follows immediately after the description of Behemoth "which I made along with you" (Job 40 v 15)

.
Could you show just where in the Creation narrative this wondrous beast could reside, it isn't mentioned in Genesis, as being something special of note.

Leviathan would have been created along with the other sea creatures (Genesis 1 v 20-22) and Behemoth with the land creatures (Genesis 1 v 24-25) No other animals are mentioned by name, so I don't see why these two should be mentioned by name either.

The most straightforward reading of the text is that it is a poetical description of real animals. We are discovering new animals all the time and many others have become extinct. I don't see any issue with Leviathan being a genuine large animal (perhaps similar to a giant crocodile) that is now extinct.
 
Upvote 0