• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does the resurrected Christ have a body?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
Mike7251 said:
Yes, Jesus does have a physical body now. He is the only physical person in heaven right now with the resurection body. Everyone else who is a believer has to wait until the rapture to get their new physical body. Otherwise why would the dead have to rise out of their graves and meet Jesus in the air if they weren't getting new physical bodies?

Ezekiel’s Bone Yard

Then He said to me, “Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. They indeed say, ‘Our bones are dry, our hope is lost, and we ourselves are cut off!’ Therefore prophesy and say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD:

“Behold, O My people, I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. Then you shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves. I will put My Spirit in you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land. Then you shall know that I, the LORD, have spoken it and performed it,” says the LORD.’” (Ezekiel 37:11-14)

During the Babylonian captivity Israel was cut off from her homeland. They spent seventy years in another country. (Here’s the point.) Israel was cut off from the Promised Land was, in the sight of God, as dead! All these Jews were alive physically, but as the Lord showed Ezekiel they were in a valley of dry bones and in a grave nationally.

God in restoring His people to their own land uses the figure of graves opening and His people coming forth in national resurrection.

Reader if you now understand this second meaning of death (national Jews cut off from the promised land), then you possess a valuable tool in understanding mans separated from God in (Genesis 3:23-24). Man was cut off from the tree of life and no longer in the presence of God. Man was cut off from God, just like Israel was cut off from their promise land while in Babylonian captivity. To God they were also separated from Him and in a grave nationally.

It was after Babylonian captivity that Jerusalem was re-built that futurist get confused with the day we are living in right now when it comes to the re-building of the temple. Most of the prophecies concerning the restoration of Israel by Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, etc. had to do with the Herod’s temple. Not any future temple where a world ruler called the Antichrist will be. After 70 AD the only temple that scripture deals with is the body of the believer in which indwells Jesus Christ. Well the Father and Holy Spirit also. In Christ is the fullness of the Godhead bodily the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.


Colossians 2
8Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. 9For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; 10 and you are complete in Him, who is the head of all principality and power.

Being Caught Up

The modern concept that physical human bodies had to be transformed into the likeness of Christ is not consistent with scripture. The first century saints were indeed transformed in the likeness of Christ in their physical bodies.

In Romans 6:1-11 the apostle demonstrates how in baptism the Romans had died with Christ, vs. 3, and had been raised with him, vs. 4. This patently cannot refer to a physical body, and resurrection. But notice verse 5: "If we have been planted with him in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection."

Is the likeness of his death a physical likeness? If so, Paul and the other had died physically. But if it be admitted that this refers to a spiritual likeness how does this impact verse 5? Are we to see that in baptism there is a spiritual likeness to the death of Jesus but in resurrection there will be a physical imitation of his resurrection? Who changed Paul's hermeneutic here? Our Modern interpreters, not Paul, change the nature of the discussion.

For Paul, the "likeness" was the same in both death and life. In verse 8 the apostle says "if we died with Christ, we believe we shall also live with him." Here Paul is talking to people still living in physical bodies yet he says they had died with Christ. The coming life was of the same nature as the death; but the death was not physical, therefore the coming life was not physical. . Paul has not changed subjects; he is still focused on his singular desire to be in the "likeness of Christ.

In order to understand what Paul is saying we must see how Paul talks in terms of covenants. Colossians 3:1 is of the same discussion. Paul said the Colossians had died with Christ and their lives were hidden. Was that a physical death NO.

The New Testament writers likened life under the Old Covenant to death, because all those under the Law were under the curse, Gal. 3:10f. We must see things the way Paul was teaching the covenant change over.

The futurist view just does not make sense when you look at it in the context of the entire New Testament. The typical futurist takes scripture out of context not only of other scripture, but of its cultural and historical context. For example, they say that being transformed to His likeness has to do with the physical body. Yet, the writers of the New Testament said this transformation was already in progress in Paul’s day.

But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord.
2 Cor. 3:18 (NKJV)

If we take the futurist interpretation to heart this must mean that their physical bodies were changing. Maybe they could walk half way through a wall!

We see similar problems everywhere in the New Testament. For example, the early church was exhorted by Paul to put on the Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 13:14). What were they doing? Were they literally putting on His glorified body?

Many passages in Romans create severe problems for the futurist.

Knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin.
Rom. 6:6

The body of sin had already been done away with. I guess that means that the first century Christians had no physical bodies! And the list goes on….

Clouds are most often symbolic of the Lord’s presence or if the Lord comes on the clouds, it denotes coming in judgment. Moreover, the word “air” in I Thes. 4 does not mean the air way up there. It means the air in the lungs or the immediate vicinity. Why do you suppose Paul would use this word if he had literal clouds in mind?

Verse 17 of I Thes. 4 is the crux of the matter. “And thus we shall always be with the Lord.” Are we not now with the Lord now that the fullness of the New Covenant is here? The way into the fullness of God’s presence awaited the destruction of the Old Covenant world and the Parousia (Heb 9:8). Now that it has occurred, we will always be with the Lord. Thus Jesus words in John eight ring true.

“Most assuredly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My word he shall never see death.”

As far as Ephesians two is concerned, I think we can look at the state of the first century church in light of their union with Christ. What was past concerning Christ at the time? He had died, and the early believers had died with Him. He was raised and seated in a position above all rule and authority and power. He was reigning over what He would put an end to at the Parousia. Ephesians one and two are a picture of the church in her reigning state at that time. Yet, the scriptures also say that when Christ was revealed they too would be revealed with Him in glory. In other words, their full and final victory awaited the Lord’s appearing.
 
Upvote 0

mark53

Veteran
Jan 16, 2005
1,336
47
72
Ingle Farm, Adelaide, South Australia
✟24,379.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Ran77 said:
Thanks for the response. However, I am convinced that at no time in our history so far has satan been chained. Sin and evil have been ever-present since they were introduced. An event of such magnitude would have be better documented among the apostles if it had occured.

I believe there are many contradictions between what you have stated and what is written in the Bible. Still, I appreciate your taking the time to explain them to me.


:)

I also see such passages as the Kingdom of God is amongst you, i.e. now! not in the future. I believe that where there is God Being there is also a counter action in Evil. it is up to us to live with God, n ow and not be contolled by evil.
 
Upvote 0

mark53

Veteran
Jan 16, 2005
1,336
47
72
Ingle Farm, Adelaide, South Australia
✟24,379.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I find all this meeting Jesus in the air type stuff a bit unbelieveable in this day and age, The earth is not flat and the heavens are not just above the clouds which one can sit on. These passages are quoted so often in this debate. If one of you can sit on a cloud I will believe you. If any of our telescopes have seen God and Jesus physcial body out there somewhere I will also believe you!
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Hidden Manna said:
The Glory of the New Covenant

Jesus said that His kingdom would come without observation. (Luke 17:20-21) Paul said in II Cor 4: We do not look at the things, which are seen, but at the things which are not seen. For the things, which are seen, are temporary, but the things, which are not seen are eternal.

And is the kingdom of God the same thing as the millenium or the marking of the Second Coming? I don't believe that it is.

Matt. 24: 3

...Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of they coming, and the end of the world?


When I read this I see a connection between the Second Coming and the end of the world. The world has not ended - it still exists.

Also, in verse 14 it says: "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.

In the time period that you have cited the gospel had a very limited area of influence; it had not been taught to all the world. And as the verse indicates, once it has the end shall come. We have not experienced the end of the world yet.

Verse 21 talks about a time of tribulation that hasn't been seen since the beginning of the world, nor will it again until the end. I don't feel that has happened. The Bible certainly doesnt describe anything like it. I don't recall anything out of history books that would fit that category.

Verse 30 specifically states that the sign of the Son of man shall appear in the heavens. Then shall they see Him coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And the angels will be sent forth with the sounds of a great trumpet.

All of these things indicate things that will be observed - in fact, very hard not to observe. The Bible does not support a view that the Second Coming would come unobserved. Since, there is no record of this great event listed by those living during 70 AD I have to believe that it has not happened.


Hidden Manna said:
The problem we have today is that the same thinking that caused so many of the Jews to miss the Messiah is still around today. They were expecting the messiah to bring a visible OC type kingdom. in other words, more of the same, only bigger and better. Likewise, today we still have people expecting a really big cubic city to drop down out of the sky someday.

I can accept an interpretation of "the kingdom of God" to be the gospel being practiced by believers. However, I had been talking about the Second Coming. I see that as a different topic. There are plenty of verses in the Bible that indicate that His coming will not be a matter that can be dismissed - or even missed.


I'm short on time. Maybe I can respond to the rest later.

:)
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
mark53 said:
I also see such passages as the Kingdom of God is amongst you, i.e. now! not in the future. I believe that where there is God Being there is also a counter action in Evil. it is up to us to live with God, n ow and not be contolled by evil.


Do you believe that evil can exist in God's presence? Or that he can abide it existing in His presence?

Or do you mean that good cannot exist without evil?


:)
 
Upvote 0

mark53

Veteran
Jan 16, 2005
1,336
47
72
Ingle Farm, Adelaide, South Australia
✟24,379.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Ran77 said:
Do you believe that evil can exist in God's presence? Or that he can abide it existing in His presence?

Or do you mean that good cannot exist without evil?


:)

I am still working through all this! At this stage I lean towards evil existing in the universe as God is existing. God is the more powerful but if we let evil in it takes control of us and it often needs a "miracle" to change that. God is in everything and it is up to us to accept God as who He/She is and to not let evil in! This might seem a bit like rambling but it is thoughts I am trying to work through. Does htis help answer your question? Peace!
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
Ran77 said:
Matt. 24: 3

...Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of they coming, and the end of the world?


When I read this I see a connection between the Second Coming and the end of the world. The world has not ended - it still exists.

This meant the end of the then know world of Judism and the OC. If you miss the understanding of that it will throw off your whole view of the end-times.

I finally figured out how to work this quoting system :wave:
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
Ran77 said:
All of these things indicate things that will be observed - in fact, very hard not to observe. The Bible does not support a view that the Second Coming would come unobserved. Since, there is no record of this great event listed by those living during 70 AD I have to believe that it has not happened.




I can accept an interpretation of "the kingdom of God" to be the gospel being practiced by believers. However, I had been talking about the Second Coming. I see that as a different topic. There are plenty of verses in the Bible that indicate that His coming will not be a matter that can be dismissed - or even missed.


I'm short on time. Maybe I can respond to the rest later.

:)

Acts 1:11 is one of the most misunderstood verses in our New Testament! Let's draw some biblical lessons from the Bible to see what the account of Act 1:11 really says. Most people agree that Jesus was in a material body at this time. That is indeed correct. And many also believe that the Angels told the disciples that Jesus will return just as He left-bodily and visible. That is not what our Acts 1:11 says however.

Lets look at the verse 11 where it says: "Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven." (Acts 1:11) What was the manner that the disciples saw him go into heaven? Verse nine contains the answer. Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. (Acts 1:9) Verse 9 is speaking of the manner in which Jesus went into heaven. What was that manner? A cloud received Him out of their sight.

Now just to see if we are correct in our understanding of the manner in which Jesus would return in these verses, let's ask another question. Did Jesus ever mention returning in the clouds when speaking of His second coming? But Jesus kept silent. And the high priest answered and said to Him, "I put You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!" Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." (Matthew 26:63-64) The first thing that should be noticed here (Jesus told the high priest he would see his return on the clouds of heaven not us today.

And then there is this verse. "Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory (Matthew 24:30)." As you can see, these verses bear witness that Jesus returned in like manner to that of His departure. A cloud, or clouds, is the key. Clouds of course also speak of vengeance, wrath, and judgment against the enemies of God. (See Isaiah 19) Jesus was Jewish, and this was the reason why he chose to use Jewish apocalyptic language as He described His soon return to the people of His day. (Matthew 26: 63-64) The angels in Acts 1: 11 never made any kind of contradiction from anything that Jesus had already said.

Jesus as did Paul used many types and shadows from the Old Testament scriptures. Where did Jesus get all the concepts of God riding on clouds and stuff from? The Old Testament. He is the very same God who was riding the clouds in judgment. This is a very big problem if you don't understand the Jewish apocalyptic mind.

Many of us today face the same problem that confronted Jesus- trying to explain spiritual truth to those who insist on carnal literal interpretations to spiritual things. God is a Spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth. (John 4:24)
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
mark53 said:
I am still working through all this! At this stage I lean towards evil existing in the universe as God is existing. God is the more powerful but if we let evil in it takes control of us and it often needs a "miracle" to change that. God is in everything and it is up to us to accept God as who He/She is and to not let evil in! This might seem a bit like rambling but it is thoughts I am trying to work through. Does htis help answer your question? Peace!

Yep, that answered my question just fine.

:)
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Hidden Manna said:
Acts 1:11 is one of the most misunderstood verses in our New Testament! Let's draw some biblical lessons from the Bible to see what the account of Act 1:11 really says. Most people agree that Jesus was in a material body at this time. That is indeed correct. And many also believe that the Angels told the disciples that Jesus will return just as He left-bodily and visible. That is not what our Acts 1:11 says however.

Lets look at the verse 11 where it says: "Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven." (Acts 1:11) What was the manner that the disciples saw him go into heaven? Verse nine contains the answer. Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. (Acts 1:9) Verse 9 is speaking of the manner in which Jesus went into heaven. What was that manner? A cloud received Him out of their sight.

Now just to see if we are correct in our understanding of the manner in which Jesus would return in these verses, let's ask another question. Did Jesus ever mention returning in the clouds when speaking of His second coming? But Jesus kept silent. And the high priest answered and said to Him, "I put You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!" Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." (Matthew 26:63-64) The first thing that should be noticed here (Jesus told the high priest he would see his return on the clouds of heaven not us today.

And then there is this verse. "Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory (Matthew 24:30)." As you can see, these verses bear witness that Jesus returned in like manner to that of His departure. A cloud, or clouds, is the key. Clouds of course also speak of vengeance, wrath, and judgment against the enemies of God. (See Isaiah 19) Jesus was Jewish, and this was the reason why he chose to use Jewish apocalyptic language as He described His soon return to the people of His day. (Matthew 26: 63-64) The angels in Acts 1: 11 never made any kind of contradiction from anything that Jesus had already said.

Jesus as did Paul used many types and shadows from the Old Testament scriptures. Where did Jesus get all the concepts of God riding on clouds and stuff from? The Old Testament. He is the very same God who was riding the clouds in judgment. This is a very big problem if you don't understand the Jewish apocalyptic mind.

Many of us today face the same problem that confronted Jesus- trying to explain spiritual truth to those who insist on carnal literal interpretations to spiritual things. God is a Spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth. (John 4:24)

Does this answer how angels sounding great trumpets would be missed by those alive in 70 AD?

:)
 
Upvote 0

Hidden Manna

Veteran
Feb 21, 2004
1,206
11
69
✟16,418.00
Faith
Christian
Ran77 said:
Why isn't there any record of it in the Bible then? Or by any of the early Christian scholars?


:)

Maybe the carnal futurist burned them up when they had the big book burning roast. They may have done so in order to control religion as the Pharisees would have done. Do you know what I'm mean about the many books that were burned up shortly after the first century? It must have been done right before the creeds were written in order not to have anything the would say otherwise. :liturgy:
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Hidden Manna said:
Maybe the carnal futurist burned them up when they had the big book burning roast. They may have done so in order to control religion as the Pharisees would have done. Do you know what I'm mean about the many books that were burned up shortly after the first century? It must have been done right before the creeds were written in order not to have anything the would say otherwise. :liturgy:

I appreciate your taking the time to answer my questions. Thanks.


:)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.