Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evidently you have misread what I have posted, since nowhwere did I say that it is a natural consequence. In fact most of those posts, you have been the one with the opinion of "natural consequences". You kept saying that I was the one who suggested God "imposed penalties'.Had you read the posts you jumped in on, you would have seen that I was advocating that it was PUNISHMENT (as you now pointed out the Bible says). The other poster (dmmrjr) was suggesting it was merely a natural consequence.
14th February 2003 at 11:43 PM OldShepherd said this in Post #174 Romans 12:19 (KJV) Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. [/list]
Explain the highlighted words, please.
Oh thank you Franklin, I am so happy to know that people like Stalin, Hitler, Mao Tze Tung, Jeffery Dawmer, John Wayne Gacey, the 911 terrorists, etc. will be forgiven AFTER they die and spend eternity in paradise with Jesus.Today at 08:37 AM franklin said this in Post #182 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=657108#post657108)
Oh that's right OS, everyone who disagrees with your teaching is a culticHeritic! give me a break! You have not only made my point but the unknown author's as well! You take apart the entire context of this great passage by Paul and use it as your own personal weapon against those who disagree with your teaching, sad, so sad. So you want an explanation? This explanation is for you OS and those who follow your sad Pagen doctrine of never ending torment and torture and your very own personal angry god who is not the God of the scriptures.
In this passage God wants to take vengeance away from us because we (you OS) kill with it, we are unjust with it, we falsely accuse with it. When we kill in the anger of vengeance, we cannot bring that person back to life. But our Father says that He can.... (Deut. 32:39) "See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand".
The God of love (not your angry god) says the way to overcome evil is with good. If your enemy is hungry, feed him-don't kill him! If you want to kill him, kill him with kindness. Jesus is able to use death and "hades" for our good, not our ultimate destruction. Even Paul, learned how to use destruction in the proper way. So then, those who preach an "angry" god, preach a narrow god, one who can't redeem most of those who he died for. He is either powerless to save, to angry to want to forgive, or too lazy to really care.
GOL, you are right, THEY CAN'T SEE IT! thanks for your post brother.
Today at 12:59 PM drmmjr said this in Post #181
God of Love,
You posted:
Evidently you have misread what I have posted, since nowhwere did I say that it is a natural consequence. In fact most of those posts, you have been the one with the opinion of "natural consequences". You kept saying that I was the one who suggested God "imposed penalties'.
A rule still has consequences. You may call them penalties and punishments, but they are still consequences. A person still has free will to obey the rule or not obey the rule. When your parents told you to be back from a date by 11:00, did you still love them when they "grounded" you for a week?
Of course, what is PUNISHMENT but a penalty? Or have you changed your mind on this?
Today at 08:14 PM OldShepherd said this in Post #184 Oh thank you Franklin, I am so happy to know that people like Stalin, Hitler, Mao Tze Tung, Jeffery Dawmer, John Wayne Gacey, the 911 terrorists, etc. will be forgiven AFTER they die and spend eternity in paradise with Jesus.
Today at 09:08 PM franklin said this in Post #183
THE NATURE OF GOD
God is love and love worketh no ill. "God is love." 1 John 4:8. "Love worketh no ill." Rom. 13:10. This is a very forcible argument. God's nature is the very essence of benevolence, and benevolence cannot be the origin of endless evil. If love worketh no ill, God can work no ill; and, therefore, God cannot be the author of endless evil.
God loves all mankind. "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son." John 3:16: and, as Jesus died for all men, so God loves all men. This argument adds great force to the last.
God loves even his enemies. For he requires men to love their enemies, which he could not do if he hated his. (Matt. 5:44) And Jesus declared, "for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil." Luke 6:35. This is but an amplification of the preceding argument. If God loves his enemies, he certainly loves all men; for no one doubts that he loves his friends. And can God cause those to be endlessly miserable whom he loves?
Amen! Let's just ignore the other 31,171 verses in the Bible, while we promote the 19th century teachings of Charlie Russell.Today at 11:46 AM God of Love said this in Post #187 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=657440#post657440)
AMEN! God is indeed LOVE.
Where is this statement or anything like it found in the Bible? This is a rationalization, trying to make the Bible fit your unbiblical teaching.Today at 11:41 AM franklin said this in Post #186 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=657426#post657426)
Would a loving God really create billions and billions of people which He knew in advance He would torture for all eternity?
And what is your point? I suggest you stick to addressing my responses and NOT make public comments about my mind.OS, do you think God knew about all the men that chose to become evil before He created them? I hope this isn't too mindboggling for you?
Oh & as for paradise and living in God's throne room, that is another subject and no one but God and His Son dwell there. What makes you think you are going to dwell there?
You will return to dust just like every other human and your spirit will return to God who gave it just like all of his creation will. What Bible are reading?
"Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it". Eccl 12:7
[/B]
Yes it is a consequence, but not a "natural" consequence as you have said I was inferring.Yesterday at 09:28 PM God of Love said this in Post #185 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=657396#post657396)
drmmjr,
I stand corrected in my presentation, however, you did infer it was a consequence:
But God does "punish" or chastize, as a result of breaking the rules. God doesn't punish just for the fun of it. God does love us and wants us to do what is right. But, if a wrong is done, then a corrective action is required.No, I have not changed my mind in the slightest. I agree that "punishment", "punishing", and "penalites" are all *nearly* the same thing. My stance remains that these conflict and "have no home" within unconditional love, and that a God who loves unconditionally would not IMPOSE these penalties or punishments on His "children".
Thus, I was "advocating" that what you were suggesting was a "punishment", and punishments did not concur with unconditional love. You, were "advocating" that it was a punishment, but God "didn't want to punish" and therefore it was really just a "choice" or "consequence" for breaking rules.
Obviously, an all-powerful God would not need to punish if He didn't want to.
Hope that clarifies.
God of Love
Today at 08:52 AM drmmjr said this in Post #190
Yes it is a consequence, but not a "natural" consequence as you have said I was inferring.
But God does "punish" or chastize, as a result of breaking the rules. God doesn't punish just for the fun of it. God does love us and wants us to do what is right. But, if a wrong is done, then a corrective action is required.
We have been talking about unconditional love and punishments. Having unconditional love doesn't mean that a back is turned to when something is wrong is done. If that were the case, then why would we need to do anything that God tells us. He's not going to do anything about it anyway.
Suppose on judgment day, you're standing in the great line, waiting to be judged, and "Mom" is about 50 folks ahead of you. Suppose that when Mom reaches God's throne, God finds her "unfit" -- that she made the wrong choices -- and hurls her over the brink, into "the Lake of Fire".
As you see her face, screaming in fear and agony, how are you going to feel about God? Are you still going to love Him, knowing He chose to destroy "Mom" (Day, Grampa, etc.) rather than forgive?
Even if "judgment" occurs instantaneously, by what I gather you believe, you are still left afterwards knowing that God "d a m n e d" your Mom because she made the wrong choices.
Today at 01:58 PM drmmjr said this in Post #192
GOL,
Did you happen to read the scripture that I posted earlier? If not, then please read it. If you did, then how do you explain it. More specifically verse 6:
Heb 12:6 - For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
If God loves you, He will chasten you. If He doesn't love you, then He won't chasten you, and you are not considered a son.
A fine example. But at that time, we won't be concerned with what might have been. We will be so happy to be with God that the things of the past will not bother us. One should be more concerned that they have done what is required to be written in the Book of Life.
Rev 21:4 - And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
But then, you believe that God has unconditional love and will not punish those who deserve it. But what about the unconditional love that God had for Sodom and Gomorrah?
Gen 19:24 - Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;
25 - And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground.
God totally destroyed those cities for what they had done. By your definition, God didn't have unconditional love at that time.
God always gives a choice. Look at Adam. He had the choice of either eating or not eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge. God didn't make us to be puppets, we have the ability to make choices, whether they be good or bad. God would like us to make all the good choices, but knows that there is the possiblility that we won't. But if there is not chastizement or punishment when those bad choices are made, then we won't know that they are bad choices.Yesterday at 07:19 PM God of Love said this in Post #193 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=659410#post659410)
I see no mention of Him not loving *all*. Isn't that what you've been saying: He loves us all and gives us a "choice"? Yet now you are suggesting there are some whom He doesn't love?
Am I reading that right? "If He doesn't love you..."
Sorry, but this answer strikes me as a bit convenient.
Again, God didn't create man to be a puppet or robot blindly doing everything that is good. God created man with a mind to make choices.Are you suggesting God created Sodom and Gomorrah without knowing their plights? That He created them, knowing He would eventually destroy them?
Futhermore, do you believe that God killed the innocent children of this village and others? Infants and the unborn? Again, creating them, knowing He would kill them.
Yet meanwhile, He spared the lives of Lot and His daughters, knowing the daughters would sleep with Lot and give birth Lot's "sons" (or is it grandsons?)?
What kind of God is this? One who loves the world so much (including the "sinners") that He sent His only begotten son to save?
A "figurative" story? Please check the following: Is there any evidence for the Biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah's destruction by fire and brimstone (sulfur)?By my definition, you are citing a figurative story as if it were literal.
God Bless,
God of Love[/B]
Today at 08:42 AM drmmjr said this in Post #194
God always gives a choice. Look at Adam. He had the choice of either eating or not eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge.
God didn't make us to be puppets
we have the ability to make choices, whether they be good or bad. God would like us to make all the good choices, but knows that there is the possiblility that we won't.
But if there is not chastizement or punishment when those bad choices are made, then we won't know that they are bad choices.
The point being, you say God doesn't punish because of "unconditional love", and I was pointing out that the only time God wouldn't punish is when He doesn't love you. But since He DOES love us, we are chastened or punished.
Sorry if you find it a bit convenient. It's true.
If you plant an apple tree in your garden, you expect it to produce fruit. But what would you do if after many years, the tree does not produce fruit?
A "figurative" story? Please check the following: Is there any evidence for the Biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah's destruction by fire and brimstone (sulfur)?
Was Moses and the exodus of the children of Israel out of Egypt a story as well? Did God part the Red Sea to allow Moses and his party cross? Did David kill Goliath with a small stone? Did Daniel survive the lion's den? Did Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego live through the fiery furnace? Was Jesus born of a virgin? Did Jesus die on the cross for our sins?
Today at 04:52 PM Hesmyall said this in Post #196
Unconditional love does not mean that there will be no punishment if the rules are breached. As a parent, I love my children unconditionally but if one of them does something that they know is not allowed there will be punishment.
Love sets limits.
I don't want my child to stand on the train tracks when the train is coming because it is something that could harm them.
16th February 2003 at 10:29 PM OldShepherd said this in Post
#189 Where is this statement or anything like it found in the Bible? This is a rationalization, trying to make the Bible fit your unbiblical teaching.
The Bible says nothing about 144,000 chosen disciples of Charlie Russell being the only ones in paradise, and OBTW heaven and paradise are the same.
Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.[/list]
I wouldn't know, because I have never read from a JayDubya's bible.
According to Franklin and GOL, Jesus really meant to say their bodies would return to dust and their spirit back to God. Does the JW Bible have this verse?
- Matt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Today at 01:08 PM franklin said this in Post #199 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=664108#post664108)
Your quote reads as thus:
Luke 23:43, "...Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with Me in paradise."[/size]
However, the correct reading of this verse should read:
Luke 23:43, "...Verily I say unto thee To day , thou shalt be with me in paradise."
Notice the placement of the comma in the second quote from the first? It changes the whole meaning of the passage. And no OS, it's not out of the Jdubya's reference book or their bible BTW.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?