You tell us not to watch Fox news, then complain because we can't recite the names of their anchors to you when you demand it. Maybe you should ask the Fox Haters, they can't seem to stop watching it.With all the fox lovers on here I am shocked nobody is able to name the anchors for FN. Why is that?
That was a very strange justification. Also i never told anyone not to watch fn. Again, please do not put words in my mouth.
And what is your point in responding the way you do?Strange he says If your intention isn't to deplete the viewership of FOx news then what is it? I would hope you have some actual point other than to constantly remind everyone how much you dislike the so-called 'Faux News'.
Again, I am pretty sure Fox doesn't identify any of their "commentators" as anchors because they don't want to be held to journalistic standards. If the entire network offers itself as "opinion", then no one can blame them for showing bias. I'm serious.With all the fox lovers on here I am shocked nobody is able to name the anchors for FN. Why is that?
That's right claims, which does not mean they are credible for one, and two, they are not as accurate as Britannica just by all the "sources needed" remarks for claims that have not been backed up. So tell you what, pick one and maybe we can discuss it. I personally think with all the bad news coming GOP leadership, from the whitehouse to Congress, has created the impression of liberal bias simply because the News media is reporting what is commonly called news.They provide links to quite a few of their claims. Besides, it's just as accurate as Britannica.
Can you answer the question or not? What is your intention with all your anti-Fox campaign if not to reduce its viewership?
If you want people to think for themselves, that would imply you want them to watch something other than Fox News. IF, after all, watching Fox News causes one to not think for themselves, then the intention must be to get people to stop watching. Thanks Neverstop. Oh, wait....Think for yourself?
Avoid my question, and ask one of your ownCan you answer the question or not? What is your intention with all your anti-Fox campaign if not to reduce its viewership?
Interesting mangling of barnyard metaphors, but your point is taken.Avoid my question, and ask one of your own
I have never tried to change anybody's mind about viewing Foxnews. You want to be a mindless sheeple feeding from the Fox trough, fine with me. I have been there, done that....I had my fill.
It is pretty funny to see the local Fox News station do an hour of news and switch to Geraldo!Hey, we can all relax cause geraldo is going to tell us the truth about iraq!
While I would agree with the majority of mainstream media is Liberal, they're not atheist. I don't see them promoting extreme environmentalism, socialism (but certainly a more socialistic policy), feminism (in the sense that females get more rights), inappropriate contentography (in fact I see the opposite), abortion, homosexuality, or an atheistic lifestyle.Does ABC, NBC, CBS have an agenda?
I believe there is a cultural war in America between Christians and Atheists. This war is being fought on the battlefield of politics. The battles are in the voting booth. The prize in the cultural war is the hearts, minds and souls of the children. The Atheistic liberal news media greatly influences both domestic and foreign policy by constantly reporting only bad news about Christians, conservatives and Republicans and only good news about atheists, liberals and democrats. The agenda of the Atheistic liberal news media is to promote extreme environmentalism, socialism, feminism, inappropriate contentography, abortion, homosexuality and the Atheistic lifestyle by having democrats in control of government.