Favoredclay
Active Member
- Apr 11, 2020
- 59
- 49
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Gerald Schroeder - Wikipedia
Schroeder gives a theory as to how both are true.
I see the earth as a created place. Everything works as a part in a great symbiotic relationship and you can easily see order and design. I do not see evidence of evolution in any form, I see adaptation of existing species, but no evidence of new species. There are no known transitional DNA models to my knowledge. The transitional archeological record just does not exist. There are no archeological records showing the move from gills to lungs for mammals coming out of the sea.....on and on. Some will say that there is evidence, but it's only speculation. Sure we share common parts with many animals, but that doesn't mean we have a common ancestor. You can find a radiator in a car or in a house, they do the same thing, but the car wasn't once a house. I do see design and defininition parameters. God created the standards of science and physics as part of the creation standards that hold everything together. We are made of common materials, but the spirit that gives us life is God breathed into us. Why can't science make a computer sentient or simply create an animal? We can manipulate, but we can't create, so how did the universe do this out of nothing. Stephen Hawking was deluded, he now knows better and probably wishes he had a do over.
Yes you have a problem if you believe the Bible is not true in pure form. You are in essence saying that God is a liar. You are saying man authored the Bible and not God. Sure a lot is written as example and symbolically, but it's pretty easy to see what is and what principles are solid. The clue in Genesis is the very first verse:
Genesis 1:1 New International Version (NIV)
The Beginning
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
This removes all doubt as to it being interpretive, it's a literal truth statement
Schroeder gives a theory as to how both are true.
I see the earth as a created place. Everything works as a part in a great symbiotic relationship and you can easily see order and design. I do not see evidence of evolution in any form, I see adaptation of existing species, but no evidence of new species. There are no known transitional DNA models to my knowledge. The transitional archeological record just does not exist. There are no archeological records showing the move from gills to lungs for mammals coming out of the sea.....on and on. Some will say that there is evidence, but it's only speculation. Sure we share common parts with many animals, but that doesn't mean we have a common ancestor. You can find a radiator in a car or in a house, they do the same thing, but the car wasn't once a house. I do see design and defininition parameters. God created the standards of science and physics as part of the creation standards that hold everything together. We are made of common materials, but the spirit that gives us life is God breathed into us. Why can't science make a computer sentient or simply create an animal? We can manipulate, but we can't create, so how did the universe do this out of nothing. Stephen Hawking was deluded, he now knows better and probably wishes he had a do over.
Yes you have a problem if you believe the Bible is not true in pure form. You are in essence saying that God is a liar. You are saying man authored the Bible and not God. Sure a lot is written as example and symbolically, but it's pretty easy to see what is and what principles are solid. The clue in Genesis is the very first verse:
Genesis 1:1 New International Version (NIV)
The Beginning
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
This removes all doubt as to it being interpretive, it's a literal truth statement
Upvote
0