- Apr 19, 2013
- 3,998
- 1,877
- 46
- Country
- Uruguay
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
The world demands a natural explanation that doesn't involve God, they reject God.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes Lucy IS a hoax. You believe there are 0 lies in science? Humans involved in anything will contain lies.
Problems with Lucy and Skull 1470
The succession is based on morphological features and temporal locality. You don't have to witness a skeleton giving birth to another skeleton to recognize succession
Just as there is a succession of colors in a rainbow, birth isn't necessary in the equation for the sequence to be observed.
So the question then becomes, what is the best explanation for this sequence of fossils.
. This is Lucy . Simply because they have her right thigh bone and most of her right shin . That means they know what both legs looked like . The same with her pelvis . There are a lot of other Australopithecus afarensis fossils including skulls ,faces and feet . So we know what the species tended to look like even if we don’t have Lucy’s face and skull. But you creationists are never told about the other fossils which is fairly typical of creationist disinformation. Or the other fossil species and it’s not JUST THE FOSSILS. We have a lot of other information that screams out common descent especially that DNAThe bible says they will bring forth after their own kind.
Genesis 1:24 “And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.”
Show me the proof that anything breads forth NOT after their own kind. 0 evidence of this. Except pictures of dead bones with lines between them.
Lucy is a big hoax. If you seriously believe that a couple of bones like this is the missing link, that's wild in my opinion. Some of the bones are not from this species apparently.
I’m not rejecting God . Lying about God’s creation the way creationists do, seems like blasphemy to meThe world demands a natural explanation that doesn't involve God, they reject God.
. This is Lucy . Simply because they have her right thigh bone and most of her right shin . That means they know what both legs looked like . The same with her pelvis . There are a lot of other Australopithecus afarensis fossils including skulls ,faces and feet . So we know what the species tended to look like even if we don’t have Lucy’s face and skull. But you creationists are never told about the other fossils which is fairly typical of creationist disinformation. Or the other fossil species and it’s not JUST THE FOSSILS. We have a lot of other information that screams out common descent especially that DNA
I’m not rejecting God . Lying about God’s creation the way creationists do, seems like blasphemy to me
Evolutionists never contaminated me. The word "human" means the kind of animal we are. It is biological and has nothing to do with the spirit and soul within us.
You are hung up on the idea that just because a spirit and soul are within us, what makes people human can't possibly be a physical thing. That is DEAD WRONG.
So the bible is lying then? Or right it's all symbolic. God gave all the comple details of ancestry of Adam with ages just for fun? The ages of every first born given just for symbolism?
God created natural phenomena.mainstream Scientists just report what they find . Creationists lie about what scientists find because they’re so committed to a story that they think is a history. Why lie about scientific findings ? Aren’t we Christians forbidden to lie. Isn’t Satan the father of lies . That why I consider creationist behavior to be blasphemousSo the bible is lying then? Or right it's all symbolic. God gave all the comple details of ancestry of Adam with ages just for fun? The ages of every first born given just for symbolism?
I’m not rejecting God . Lying about God’s creation the way creationists do, seems like blasphemy to me
God created natural phenomena.mainstream Scientists just report what they find . Creationists lie about what scientists find because they’re so committed to a story that they think is a history. Why lie about scientific findings ? Aren’t we Christians forbidden to lie. Isn’t Satan the father of lies . That why I consider creationist behavior to be blasphemous
I’m not rejecting God . Lying about God’s creation the way creationists do, seems like blasphemy to me
Explain to me why all the ages from Adam to Jesus is for? Why would each day would be very clear to be very specifically saying evening and morning?
You ignore the questions, I believe you are lying not the bible.
animals don’t have minds ? Obviously you never paid attention to your dogIts what the world fed you up to believe, and they reject God. They need a naturalistic explanation badly. They ignore death is not the end, and that is what is most important anyway for people is to know Jesus, you need to assume a lot of wacky stuff with evolution, like animals were stripped out of their minds, and God placed within one generation souls and spirits, that is almost a different gospel in my view, because WE have a human soul and spirit.
animals don’t have minds ? Obviously you never paid attention to your dog
No. If the author of Genesis intended the account to be historical (and I’m not entirely convinced), he didn’t know better. That’s not lying. Lying is when you do know.So the bible is lying then? Or right it's all symbolic. God gave all the comple details of ancestry from Adam to Jesus with ages just for fun? The ages of every first born given just for symbolism?
Humans are biologically apes.
Being made in the image of God has nothing to do with where homo sapiens is on taxonomic charts. As a human, you are just that - human.
No. If the author of Genesis intended the account to be historical (and I’m not entirely convinced), he didn’t know better. That’s not lying. Lying is when you do know.
Based on this logic, you would find a car with a computer and electronics within it, find the same in a plane. You would say that they are related and evolved from the computer...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?