Does anyone listen to Ann Coulter anymore?

[AngelusSax]

AFAIK, our "plan" was to march in like the wrath of God and be "welcomed as liberators."

Worked like a charm, hmmm?

Just because the media refuses to show Iraqis who actually do like us and welcome us, doesn't mean no one is doing that. But the sensationalistic side is the one blowing everyone up for their 72 virgins or whatever...

I'm just saying there's 2 sides to this coin, and most of the media will only show one side of it. And that side is, unfortunately, the one that anti-war protesters can use to further their yelling and screaming about how we're wvil for going into Iraq (though they call for similar action to places like Sudan and Rwanda... countries who, if we help them, have no chance at all of making us safer if we march in there. At least Iraq offered and still offers that chance if things work out right).

 

[Blemonds]

all of that technology is useless when your enemy is in close range....like I said spitballs.

1. Can we please stay on topic?

2. I thought you had me on ignore?

 

[PACKY]

1. Can we please stay on topic?

2. I thought you had me on ignore?

1) sure as soon as you start answering questions vs. just asking them.

2) I said i discovered the ignore button never said i used it for "you"... I need some entertainment in my boring life my freind.

 

[Blemonds]

1) sure as soon as you start answering questions vs. just asking them.

I've done a good job of answering questions about Ann Coulter and I have properly directed people to the appropriate thread to discuss the war palnning.

 

[PACKY]

yeah................ok...

 

[xMinionX]

So what about Ann Coulters statements concerning her wish for terrorists to fly planes into the NY Times offices? Is that representing America against the evil liberals?

 

[PACKY]

So what about Ann Coulters statements concerning her wish for terrorists to fly planes into the NY Times offices? Is that representing America against the evil liberals?

I am sure they will use the same sorry old worn out record excuse anytime a conservative says something that shows their true intentions and lack of class... " ohh they were taken out of context"..
or maybe youll just be asked questions vs. getting your answered...as that also seems to be the norm.

 

[Billnew]

Poor Alan, I do feel for Him sometimes. Last night He was stuck defending "count every vote and every vote counts". A half day of the most powerful institution in the world dedicated to, well, something useful for the little people, makes a body feel good. I have no idea what this costs but money well spent, no doubt about that. The poor people in Ohio need all the help they can get, counting is hard to do.

I like Ann Coulter.

Unlike Florida, We can count.
We went through one time counted and certified it.
Losers that through a fit, and stomped their feet cost tax payers money
to change the "official tally" less then 1%.(2000votes different?)
Price per precious vote is outrageous. Every vote counts? Yea, when wasting my money! Why didn't they protest a race that was closer?
OHIO IS NOT FLORIDA. And this Pesidential decision was never under debate.

I beleive the cost was $280,000 for 2000 votes. $140/vote change.

As far as Ann Coultier, She is a milder equivalent to MIckey MOore. Accept she hasn't made a fantasy movie yet.

 

[eldermike]

We can count.

Yes you can! But the new idea is to count until you win.

 

[Mrs.Sidhe]

Blemonds I've read your posts in this forum and all I see is your blasting of liberals without one shred of evidence. Also when someone asks you to try to defend the obviously hatefull comments by this women and all you can say is "Liberals this and liberals that". You use some overrated cookie cutter image of a liberal to insult people without just cause. No one has been using that on you being a conservative. You don't give one iota of reason why anyone should listen to her or that her point of view is right.

I don't think the question is that does anyone listen to ann coulter any more I think the quesiton should be why did anyone listen to her in the first place?

 

[PACKY]

Unlike Florida, We can count.
We went through one time counted and certified it.
Losers that through a fit, and stomped their feet cost tax payers money
to change the "official tally" less then 1%.(2000votes different?)
Price per precious vote is outrageous. Every vote counts? Yea, when wasting my money! Why didn't they protest a race that was closer?
OHIO IS NOT FLORIDA. And this Pesidential decision was never under debate.

I beleive the cost was $280,000 for 2000 votes. $140/vote change.

As far as Ann Coultier, She is a milder equivalent to MIckey MOore. Accept she hasn't made a fantasy movie yet.

If somebody told you that your vote wouldnt be counted because it cost $140 how would you feel? i am sure you would raise a royal stink about it!...Youre attempting to put a price tag on democracy..
How AMERICAN!!! the land of the almighty!!! (dollar that is..)

 

[PACKY]

Blemonds I've read your posts in this forum and all I see is your blasting of liberals without one shred of evidence. Also when someone asks you to try to defend the obviously hatefull comments by this women and all you can say is "Liberals this and liberals that". You use some overrated cookie cutter image of a liberal to insult people without just cause. No one has been using that on you being a conservative. You don't give one iota of reason why anyone should listen to her or that her point of view is right.

I don't think the question is that does anyone listen to ann coulter any more I think the quesiton should be why did anyone listen to her in the first place?

I tried to help...................... http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/anger.html
but all i got back in return is question's??............LOL

 

[praying]

Does anyone listen to Ann Coulter anymore?

At this point I am not sure why anyone is listening to this thread anymore. :o

 

[PACKY]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Published on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 by CommonDreams.org [/font]​

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Wasn’t Jesus A Liberal? [/font]​

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]by Gary Vance[/font]​

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Liberalism has been under assault for years now. The battering of this grand political philosophy has altered the contemporary definition of liberal to the point that Conservatives use it as a profane word. They use it to paint a political opponent as anti-God and anti-American. It has gotten to the point that moderate and liberal Christians are afraid to be open about their political leanings. Sadly, it even affects their conscience and choices as they enter the voting booth. This is particularly troubling to me as a Christian evangelical minister who loves America.

Liberalism as defined by Webster’s Third New International Dictionary: “a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of man, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for tolerance and freedom for the individual from arbitrary authority in all spheres of life…”

I am not sure why anyone would feel threatened by Liberalism as defined by the dictionary. They are apparently unaware or simply refuse to acknowledge the long history of liberals who have labored for the betterment of society and the furthering of God’s Kingdom.

The labor movement of the early twentieth century was aided significantly when major Christian denominations got behind it. No average American would have a fair wage today if it weren’t for liberal Christians and labor activists. Liberal Christians and civil rights activists fought and still fight against conservative America for racial equality. Child labor laws were enacted because liberals fought for them. Medicare and Social Security exist today because of Liberalism. “Bleeding heart liberals” have long advocated for the homeless, the hungry, the less fortunate, and the disenfranchised. The women of America owe liberals a big thank you for their almost equal rights. “Tree hugging liberals” fight for clean air and water standards instead of favoring industrial polluters and short term profiteering that destroy God’s green earth.

Liberals believe in affordable health care for all U.S. citizens. They also believe in higher taxes for the rich and lower taxes for the middle class and the poor. Liberals love their spouses and children. Liberals faithfully attend their churches to worship God. Liberals love America and hate terrorism and have proved it by fighting in every war for this country. Liberals come in all shapes, sizes, and color. They are found in the ranks of Protestants, Catholics, Jews, agnostics, and atheists.

Conservative Republican policies generally favor the wealthy and ignore the needs of the poor. Their policies are so often greed-driven, with no concern for the environmental or societal consequences for their exploitive actions. Jesus plainly taught that the love of money is the root of all evil. So, Christians can go after the various “fruit” of sin in our society, but they won’t see the real change for the better until the axe is laid to the root. Christians should oppose greed-driven policies as a primary point of political concern.

I am sick of reading letters to the editor and editorials that paint Democrats and liberals as anti-God and anti-American and that portray conservative Republicans as the only true Christian patriots. We know that many Democrats are pro-choice and many support gay issues and this troubles most evangelicals. Democrats also support causes that should be of Christian concern that go untouched by Republicans. I have listed some in the above paragraphs. True prophetic vision sees that there is great need for repentance on the left and the right. The effects of powerful lobbyists, special interest groups, greed and corruption abound on both sides of the aisles of Congress. God sees it all and so should Christians. Christian voters need to see that God’s heart breaks over more than just a few political and moral issues. It is time to take off our blinders and mourn for the sorry state of affairs that is American politics.

Jesus was the ultimate liberal progressive revolutionary of all history. The conservative religious and social structure that He defied hated and crucified Him. They examined His life and did not like what they saw. He aligned Himself with the poor and the oppressed. He challenged the religious orthodoxy of His day. He advocated pacifism and loving our enemies. He liberated women and minorities from oppression. He healed on the Sabbath and forgave adulterers and prostitutes. He associated with drunks and other social outcasts. He rebuked the religious right of His day because they embraced the letter of the law instead of the Spirit. He loved sinners and called them to Himself. Jesus was the original Liberal. He was a progressive, and He was judged and hated for it. It was the self-righteous religionists that He rebuked and He called them hypocrites.

The primary issues of Christian Liberalism were birthed when Jesus spoke the profoundly prophetic words found in Matthew 25: 31-46. These scriptures reveal God’s heart for the poor, the sick and other neglected people through out history. Christians should read this text and judge for themselves which of the two groups mentioned there more accurately reflect the political parties of today. His Liberalism lives on today and the issues have not changed much.

I am glad that conservative Republican candidates advocate for the family and a few Christian issues, but we must quit pretending that they are the only ones that Christians should consider voting for. People should not call themselves pro-life if they are only anti-abortion and yet feel no twinge of conscience over the unfair application of capital punishment or wars fought for dubious motives. A true pro-life position cares just as passionately for the born as the un-born and views war as a last resort when all other options are exhausted.

Christians should look for candidates that will work for issues that are of importance to Christ and that can be tackled legislatively. Sadly, most of those causes have historically been opposed, ignored, and minimized by conservative Republican policy makers. They seem to dangle the moral issues carrot around election time. Then, even with a Republican controlled White House and Congress, prove themselves powerless to do anything about those issues when they convene to legislate. Issues such as eliminating poverty and homelessness in America, true equal rights for all citizens, environmental protection, a fair minimum wage, affordable health care, and lowering our infant mortality rate all go unattended. That’s just to name a few. I have some questions for the Christian Right. Why have you not held our current elected majority officials accountable for their failure to address the full spectrum of Christian issues? Why would you vote for them again? It is time for Christians of conscience to stand up to religious and political hypocrisy. Christians should proudly proclaim progressive values today and should advocate for the Christian Liberalism that is our heritage and our legacy.

[/font]

 

[Grizzly]

Does anyone listen to Ann Coulter anymore?

At this point I am not sure why anyone is listening to this thread anymore. :o

Apparently because sometimes beating a dead horse is fun?

I've given up on this thread awhile ago. I stated my case against Ann, and people can decide for themselves if she is worth listening to.

Cheers

 

[PACKY]

Apparently because sometimes beating a dead horse is fun?

I've given up on this thread awhile ago. I stated my case against Ann, and people can decide for themselves if she is worth listening to.

Cheers

i THOUGHT IT WAS SINCE PEOPLE DONT HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON OR A POINT TO MAKE THEY INSTEAD LIKE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS WITH QUESTIONS???
lol.....

 

[tulc]

Apparently because sometimes beating a dead horse is fun?

I heard it's going to be a new Olympic event!
tulc(I'm practicing!

)

 

[PACKY]

I heard it's going to be a new Olympic event!
tulc(I'm practicing!

)

this thread has officially gone awry..Too funny...

 

[Blemonds]

So what about Ann Coulters statements concerning her wish for terrorists to fly planes into the NY Times offices? Is that representing America against the evil liberals?

I didn't hear her say that, but it wouldn't surprise me? Do you believe she means it when she says it? I would consider it to be satire (very funny satire actually)

 

[Blemonds]

Blemonds I've read your posts in this forum and all I see is your blasting of liberals without one shred of evidence. Also when someone asks you to try to defend the obviously hatefull comments by this women and all you can say is "Liberals this and liberals that". You use some overrated cookie cutter image of a liberal to insult people without just cause. No one has been using that on you being a conservative. You don't give one iota of reason why anyone should listen to her or that her point of view is right.

I don't think the question is that does anyone listen to ann coulter any more I think the quesiton should be why did anyone listen to her in the first place?

You obviously didn't read all of my posts. I soundly refuted the criticism against Ann until I got bored with it since the response was never to acknowledge or refute my refutation, but rather to merely shift gears and copy n' paste another story from a hate Ann Coulter web site. Anybody notice how much hate comes from the allegedly tolerant left?