Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I usually correct typos in quotes when I spot them. Sometimes I'm bad
and correct them without asking or indicating they were there. My bad.
We are talking about material from linked from other webpages. You never even bother to read those, let alone worry about typographic errors.
Since you complain about both situations, then we are brothers.
I criticise you for not bothering to read links, yes. I don't think I'm alone there. But I am not criticising gradyll for "proofreading" material from his links. I just think it likely that he is using the wrong word to describe what he is doing when he checks through webpages he might link to or use in his posts.
I suspect he is checking that the material is consistent with the point he wants to make. That is a different thing entirely.
Yes. We call that thing "research".
Does a GLOBAL FLOOD truly seem like the BEST explanation for seashells on mountains?
No because they are not only ON mountains they are IN mountains which tells me the part with the sea shells was at one time part of the sea bottom.
Why are the tops of high mountains covered in snow even in the summer? because they are so high and it's cold?
What do you think the state of the water would be if it covered those high mountains? Frozen?
What do you think a boat would do in frozen water that was above the mountains? Get stuck in the ice?
yes, they are both.However there is sufficient evidence to point both to an upheaval and to a global flood, which perhaps happened simultaneously.
exhibit A would be the global sedimentary rock laid down by water
it would be impossible to lay that down without a global size body of water
yes, they are both.
However there is sufficient evidence to point both to an upheaval and to a global flood, which perhaps happened simultaneously
exhibit A would be the global sedimentary rock laid down by water
it would be impossible to lay that down without a global size body of water
yes, they are both.
However there is sufficient evidence to point both to an upheaval and to a global flood, which perhaps happened simultaneously
exhibit A would be the global sedimentary rock laid down by water
it would be impossible to lay that down without a global size body of water
However there is sufficient evidence to point both to an upheaval and to a global flood, which perhaps happened simultaneously
exhibit A would be the global sedimentary rock laid down by water
it would be impossible to lay that down without a global size body of water
Sorry, but there is no global sedimentary layer or layers in the geological column. That is exactly what the early Christian geologists of the 19th century looked for (and mostly expected to find), but could not. See: History of the Collapse of Flood Geology and a Young Earth
Oh and one more thing... sediment alone does not implicate any flood. Marine deposits, for example, are deposited in the ocean, not by any flood.
I am hopeful that you realize tat the sedimentary rocks on earth show countlless different types of depositional histories from lakes to seas to rivers to even SAND DUNES AND WIND DEPOSITS.
Sand dunes and desert type deposits are very hard to make in a flood. And river deposits usually mean there is NONriver space around the river.
On top of that within the sedimentary record is evidence of erosion and removal of entire layers.
You will need to point to one specific portion of the sedimentary layer to make your case .
Something as physical as a WW flood would not require 'Faith' to believe because the evidence would be all around us.
'Faith' is only brought into play when there is no evidence, I would ask you to have 'Faith' in me when I had no evidence and was telling you lies.
This is literally laughable.
In my opinion it is anything but laughable I think it's downright damaging.This is literally laughable.
Gradyll do yourself a favour and try looking at sites other than creationist sites, you are not doing yourself any favours.and your evidence is what again?
a geologic column laid down tightly with little time for erosion?
specifically the sedimentary rock layers, not necessarily the geologic column in it's entirety but maybe so.
more info here:
Flat gaps
Gradyll do yourself a favour and try looking at sites other than creationist sites, you are not doing yourself any favours.
If you wanted your house electrics fixed would you call in a plumber? would you go to a car mechanic to have a tooth pulled? No?
then why are you getting your geological information from religious nuts?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?