I ask the question because recently it came to my mind. I've heard a number of times when I ask people the question they will say I need to work on x or y. However, doesn't that line of thinking mean that subconsciously you believe in meriting salvation to an extent? If Jesus came today and you think you won't go to heaven because you're smoker, addicted to inappropriate contentography, have an issue with your temper, etc. If that's the case, I believe that deep down you don't believe in salvation by faith alone (I am not knocking on those who don't affirm that). Just a food for thought what do you think?
PS: I am not talking universalism nor am I saying you can live as you want.
I had a guy ask me if the lovely non-Christian neighbor lady next door who had died was going to the same place as Hitler. He wanted to know how such a nice person, who had shown great generosity and kindness to all, could ever deserve to end up in hell just because she didn't believe in Jesus. It was a good question, I thought, and highlighted the very thing you're wondering about: On what basis do we gain acceptance with God?
I told the guy with the question about his neighbor that God's standard for entrance into His kingdom wasn't the same as ours. We look at the worst of us - the killers, rapists, genocidal maniacs, etc - and come out smelling like roses by the comparison we make of ourselves to them. On this basis, we all seem pretty good. But God's standard is not ours. His standard is His own holy perfection. To this standard, not one of us measures up. None of us get anywhere close. We are all of us foul, stinking wretches in comparison to the holy, perfect purity of Almighty God - even the nice old lady neighbor lady who never hurt a fly. Next to God, she is an awful, selfish, corrupt creature in desperate need of a Saviour - as we all are.
The problem is worse than this, however. It isn't just that we
don't measure up but that we
can't ever measure up, in-and-of ourselves. No one can live well enough to warrant God's acceptance. No matter how good we may manage to be, we will never be perfect, which is the only level of goodness God will accept. And this is exactly why we need the Saviour, Jesus Christ.
By the exercise of a saving faith in Christ as Saviour and Lord, a person has the perfect righteousness of Christ imputed to them. The born-again believer "puts on Christ," they are clothed in his righteousness, and thus declared by God to be perfectly righteous. And because they are, they meet the standard of perfection God demands of any who would enter His kingdom. One of the amazing things about this is that, since Jesus's righteousness never ceases to be perfect, the believer who is clothed in his righteousness never ceases to be accepted by God. The fear of losing salvation dissolves under this truth. God has not accepted me because of anything meritorious about me; His acceptance of me rests solely and entirely upon what Christ has done for me. So I don't diminish or increase God's acceptance of me by what I do.
What is so evil about the saved-and-lost doctrine is that it requires the believer to add to the perfect atoning work of Christ, making them co-Saviour with Jesus. A saved-and-lost (SAL) belief makes the believer's own obedience necessary to the atoning work of Christ at Calvary. On the SAL view, God is not satisfied with what Christ did for the lost on the cross; Christ's perfection is insufficient to appease God's justice and wrath. The believer must add their own work in order to be - or remain - saved.
What an atrocious sort of thinking! It is both irrational and blasphemous. How can one add to perfection? How can God's standard be higher than perfection? By definition, perfection is an ultimate, unexceedable, state of affairs. It is impossible to add to perfection; for if perfection may be added to, it is not truly perfection. But Christ's atoning work fully satisfied God; it was perfect. As God incarnate, Christ was himself perfect, too. With Christ and his work on the cross, then, God is completely and utterly content. There is no addition to what the Saviour has done that may be made and to think otherwise is to be profoundly irrational.
To elevate one's self to the place of co-Saviour - as the SAL proponent must do to hold his view - is to be guilty of outright blasphemy. There is only one Saviour. No human can claim equality with Christ in this regard. He stands alone as the "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world." As Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes unto the Father except through me." To elevate one's self to the place of co-Saviour by claiming an essential role in the maintenance of one's salvation is, then, to make one's self as God which is out-and-out blasphemy.
For these reasons - and others - the SAL false doctrine ought to be assiduously avoided. It is a fundamentally self-centered, not Christ-centered, belief that is not actually ever taught in Scripture.
The Scriptural Basis For O.s.a.s. | Christian Forums
Eternally Secure In Christ | Christian Forums
Osas: God Saves Us And He Keeps Us. | Christian Forums