Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The seven churches are in revelation. One of them is not charged, if thats what you are referring to.
As for the public display of Gods devotion, I apologize for not knowing the exact local but I remember it actually being in the OT.
What would be the Orthodox position on such a statement? I was perusing a Catholic forum board and the statement was made that all mankind "deserves" hell. That sounds to me like one is approaching our being and salvation again from a legal position. In other words, rather than saying that hell is a consequence of our choices, it makes it sound like:
"You chose sin therefore you deserve to be punished."
Punishment as law rather than consequence.
Thoughts?
We are all going to be exposed to God's holiness at the Resurrection on the last day. Whether we experience that as heaven or hell will depend on our disposition towards God. It's not a case of whether we deserve it or not.What would be the Orthodox position on such a statement? I was perusing a Catholic forum board and the statement was made that all mankind "deserves" hell. That sounds to me like one is approaching our being and salvation again from a legal position. In other words, rather than saying that hell is a consequence of our choices, it makes it sound like:
"You chose sin therefore you deserve to be punished."
Punishment as law rather than consequence.
Thoughts?
We are all going to be exposed to God's holiness at the Resurrection on the last day. Whether we experience that as heaven or hell will depend on our disposition towards God. It's not a case of whether we deserve it or not.
And this is what happens when human beings leave their bodies. We drop into an ocean of God's love, which has been likened by the saints to fire. It is a fire which those who have cultivated their theosis here on earth, will find warm, refreshing, and total joy. But those who are immerse in this fire in an ontological state of sin, rebellion, and selfishness, this same fire will be experienced as pain, sorrow, and alienation.
I think that's beautiful. First time hearing that. Is that Orthodox perspective?
I think that's beautiful. First time hearing that. Is that Orthodox perspective?
Yes, Saint Isaac the Syrian and the Macarian Homilies talk extensively about it. All of creation is like the burning bush, and God is the fire. This is what Saint John the Forerunner was talking about regarding the fire of the baptism Christ was bringing.I think that's beautiful. First time hearing that. Is that Orthodox perspective?
What would be the Orthodox position on such a statement? I was perusing a Catholic forum board and the statement was made that all mankind "deserves" hell. That sounds to me like one is approaching our being and salvation again from a legal position. In other words, rather than saying that hell is a consequence of our choices, it makes it sound like:
"You chose sin therefore you deserve to be punished."
Punishment as law rather than consequence.
Thoughts?
Eternal separation from God is the consequence of denying His Son, Jesus.
“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.” (Matthew 25:46).
“And <2532> these <3778> shall go away <565> (5695) into <1519> everlasting <166> punishment <2851>: but <1161> the righteous <1342> into <1519> life <2222> eternal <166>.” (Strong’s numberings for Matthew 25:46).
Because the same Greek word ‘aionios’ is used to describe both ‘eternal life’ as well as ‘eternal punishment,’ it’s completely unreasonable to interpret this single word in two contrasting ways within the same verse (Matthew 25:46). If eternal life means forever and ever, and it does mean this, then logically ‘eternal punishment’ must also mean forever and ever. If however the punishment in hell isn’t forever and ever, but is only by a fire, which instantaneously destroys the sinner. Then to be consistent, if the ‘eternal punishment’ isn’t really eternal, i.e. forever and ever, then neither can ‘eternal life’ in heaven be eternal, seeing the same Greek word is used to describe both conditions.
Personally, I’d happen to regard “hell” as referring to an eternal state, where persons will now eternally exist in unveiled God’s universe (presence?). To those who know and love God, existing eternally in such an unveiled presence of God will be bliss, as he or she will have been transformed into his (God’s) likeness, spiritually at our conversion and justification, and physically at Christ’s second coming (Romans 8:23). However, to those whose natures are fallen and unredeemed, the eternal existence of such people in the complete unveiled presence of God will produce intense pain and suffering, to varying degrees, dependent upon their own depravity and depths of sin in disharmony with the omnipresence existence of the holy (and sinless) God.
So, whilst I would personally hold to the position of “eternal conscious torment” for fallen unbelievers, in the (post-second coming) eternal state. None-the-less, I would also postulate as a possible explanation for this, that God himself does not actively punish or consciously torment these lost sinners, so therefore God is not himself responsible for the eternal sufferings of the lost which they will suffer eternally and also to varying degrees. As in my opinion, eternal conscious suffering is just the obvious result of God simply unveiling his presence to creation in the eternal state.
So I’d argue that the “fire,” and to the lake of fire, indicates God’s omnipresent unveiled presence; which produces pain in those who do not know God. At the present time God has actively veiled his presence, as without his presence being currently veiled, all persons across the world would instantly perceive God fully, thereby nullifying the need for faith (trust). So the riddle of hell isn’t that God is some sadist who actively tortures people, by some deliberate act of sadism. God has the complete right to unveil his presence from us, as this is his natural state, and when he does (eternally) unveil his presence, then the lost will suffer (eternally and also to varying degrees), from simply existing as sinful creatures in his presence. In doing so, God is not actively torturing people, God is passive, as it’s the sinner’s sin which causes their own pain and suffering in the presence of the unveiled holiness of God.
Interesting ... I had not especially noticed that word in that context, but it actually makes more sense (from an Orthodox perspective) than you might realize.
Actually, this is very closely aligned with an Orthodox understanding of the eschaton. I don't think you'll find any argument here, except that some have put forth the possible hope that even the torment the depraved experience COULD POSSIBLY BE redemptive in some sense, such that they MIGHT not be eternally suffering. But this is only a hope, we do not have any such promise from God, nor can we put it forth to any person as a possible "second chance". We can only hold it, at most, as a hope and so pray for persons, no matter what their condition might be, or seem to be - we never know anyway.
But otherwise, I think you'd find much agreement in Orthodox thinking.
Personally it's much easier for me to understand such a concept of eternal suffering as a natural consequence being in line with a God Who IS love, rather than the idea of one who vengefully and purposely punishes because He is offended.
“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.” (Matthew 25:46).
“And <2532> these <3778> shall go away <565> (5695) into <1519> everlasting <166> punishment <2851>: but <1161> the righteous <1342> into <1519> life <2222> eternal <166>.” (Strong’s numberings for Matthew 25:46).
Because the same Greek word ‘aionios’ is used to describe both ‘eternal life’ as well as ‘eternal punishment,’ it’s completely unreasonable to interpret this single word in two contrasting ways within the same verse (Matthew 25:46). If eternal life means forever and ever, and it does mean this, then logically ‘eternal punishment’ must also mean forever and ever. If however the punishment in hell isn’t forever and ever, but is only by a fire, which instantaneously destroys the sinner. Then to be consistent, if the ‘eternal punishment’ isn’t really eternal, i.e. forever and ever, then neither can ‘eternal life’ in heaven be eternal, seeing the same Greek word is used to describe both conditions.
Personally, I’d happen to regard “hell” as referring to an eternal state, where persons will now eternally exist in unveiled God’s universe (presence?). To those who know and love God, existing eternally in such an unveiled presence of God will be bliss, as he or she will have been transformed into his (God’s) likeness, spiritually at our conversion and justification, and physically at Christ’s second coming (Romans 8:23). However, to those whose natures are fallen and unredeemed, the eternal existence of such people in the complete unveiled presence of God will produce intense pain and suffering, to varying degrees, dependent upon their own depravity and depths of sin in disharmony with the omnipresence existence of the holy (and sinless) God.
First of all, to translate "aionios" as meaning eternal is like saying car means duck. Aion is an age. That is the root of the word, therefore, any derivation of it must have some reference to age or an age. Aionios means "of the age" or "age-long." It was Augustine - who didn't know Jack about Greek - who decided that it means eternal. Now would you go to someone who only spoke Russian and didn't understand English and ask him to translate an English Bible into Russian? I think not. Same thing applies with Augustine.
There is another word which always in Greek means eternal. That word is aididion. It was not used. The Greeks knew how to parse the adjectival use of the word properly. The Latins did not.
According to the Greek scholars I have been reading, this is not how the word "aionios" works. It is the subject that determines the quality of the adjective. For instance, if I say that there is a tall dog being walked by a tall man, are they both the same height? No.
There are simply too many verses of Scripture which point to the final restoration of all things to ignore.
Exactly what Orthodoxy teaches!
The only caveat I would place in here is that the Patristic Fathers stated that there will be a time when the punishment or torment of being in the presence of God will have produced A.) a proportional and sufficient justice for the sins done and B.) a change in the attitude of the sinner as he/she will come to realize the utter nothingness the sin they clung to in life and the foolishness of continuing to exist in such a state of ruin.
or C.) eternal and ever growing torment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?