It is not a matter of having it both ways. I believe TOm explained that what President Snow said was true, but that there is not enough complete information given to understand the mysteries of Godliness, not to mention having an intelligent discussion.Wrigley said:You can't have it both ways. Either your god was once a man, or he wasn't. Make your choice.
When covering so much doctrine, the unknown mysteries are bound to surface. That is a fact that we must deal with. Since it is our mystery, then unlocking it would also be found in our doctrine. Applying this doctrine to your standard of belief goes back to my jig saw puzzle concept. You cannot take any piece from our puzzle and expect it to fit in your puzzle. Yet that is the source of all your criticism.And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: .........(1 Timothy3:16)
But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: (1 Corinthians2:7)
Our gospels are different. And then you will say:
...assuming that you have a gospel that is the same as the one in existance when this was written.
4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him. (2 Corinthians11:4)
But in our gospel it is the same that was preached in those days because what was lost temporarily, is now restored.
Don't you get it? We are going on an eternal merry-go-round over issues that are apples to doughnuts! We are not speaking the same language!
My suggestion comes from my experience at work. When something is complicated, I remember that complication is only multiple basics that work together in harmony. If the complicated equipment that I work on fails, I gather all the basics that make it work, and find out which basic is faulty, or missing.
Are there defined basics in the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
I would like to hear them from you.
Upvote
0