coffee4u
Well-Known Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 5,005
- 2,817
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Without attempting to estimate the age of fossils, it is still reasonable to assume that life on earth existed before Adam (I wish to retract my fossil record "proof" comment in post 115). This reasonable assumption is based on the fact that no evidence of human life has ever been found in the same geological strata as dinosaurs, for example ... or trilobites.
Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that dinosaurs and trilobites (along with countless other animals) existed before human beings.
Conversely, it would be decidedly UNREASONABLE to conclude from fossil evidence that humans, dinosaurs and trilobites existed at the same time.
Which is higher scripture or man's knowledge?
I say scripture.
I think its perfectly reasonable given what scripture says that dinosaurs lived right alongside mankind, that the global flood dwindled there number and that mankind killed most of them off shortly after the end of the flood.
I see no reason why these two scriptures can't be describing a land and 'sea type dinosaurs.
Job 40 Behemoth
15 “Look at Behemoth,
which I made along with you
Leviathan Job 41
Again which fossil evidence? Whose evidence? You expect that atheistic scientist to ever say anything else? Meanwhile you ignore creation scientists or any other scientist who brings up issues? You have chosen to go with those who fit your view. I decided over 30 years ago to start looking at the other side and am glad I did because now the Bible makes sense and it all fits.
If you were really interested in evidence you would take the time to study each side but like most people you quickly slid into the secular camp because its easy.
Upvote
0