And who did I say prompted the sequel?
Did I not say it was the Devil?
Our enemy.
So it should be offensive, shouldn't it?
Yet somehow it IS still offensive. Because everything you guys disagree with or feel threatened by, you can simply say the DEVIL caused it.
That means Darwin and all the thousands upon thousands of researchers in the ensuing 2 centuries were unwitting dupes of the devil.
I understand you think the devil is real. That's part of your belief system. But could it just be that when someone says something you disagree with that perhaps, just perhaps, it isn't because the Lord of the Flies has infested their brain and taken them over to do ultimate battle with God almighty?
Could you just, for a change, simply
disagree with the science you don't understand?
Like I said I try not to attribute some grand overarching evil to Creationists. I think they honestly believe what the say they believe and they arrive at their beliefs because their beliefs are more important than any assessment of the data. It actually MAKES SENSE why a Creationist believes as they do. If I thought my immortal soul was under threat by some science I would probably AVOID learning anything about that science and I'd cling tenaciously to whomever told me what I wanted to hear.
(This is not to say that I don't believe there are some creationist organizations who actively manipulate data and present lies and falsehoods, but I suspect they are few and far between. The majority of probably just don't do science well, like Steve Austin and his dating of the Mt. St. Helens dacite).
When you open the door the idea that some of your FELLOW HUMANS are overtaken by the devil and their work is part and parcel of Hitler's plans, well then you should accept that that can have VERY BAD outcomes. Perhaps not something you would like to see happen. But faith can be, and often is, leveraged to do really horrible things to other people here in the physical realm.
Does this in any way make sense to you?