As of a couple of days ago, Swedish planners thought cases had plateaued. If that was right, they’re in reasonable shape. If not, they’re in for trouble. You can’t base decisions on a couple of days data, but it doesn’t look good for them.
Here is their reasoning: Sweden resisted a lockdown, and its capital Stockholm is expected to reach 'herd immunity' in weeks Sounds good if they’re right about what is going to happen. Unfortunately there’s a good chance they are not.
I also find something odd in their reasoning. They seem to think they're going to reach herd immunity without having lots of people get ill from the disease. They think 20% of their population is immune. NY just tested people. About 20% of NYC has had the disease and recovered. But it took them 10,000 deaths. Unless the virus is a lot less lethal in Sweden than in NYC, you've got to wonder about that estimate. They also think they're going to get to 60% within a few weeks, while also thinking the number of cases is leveling off. I don't know of any way that immunity can spread other than people getting sick and recovering.
Here is their reasoning: Sweden resisted a lockdown, and its capital Stockholm is expected to reach 'herd immunity' in weeks Sounds good if they’re right about what is going to happen. Unfortunately there’s a good chance they are not.
I also find something odd in their reasoning. They seem to think they're going to reach herd immunity without having lots of people get ill from the disease. They think 20% of their population is immune. NY just tested people. About 20% of NYC has had the disease and recovered. But it took them 10,000 deaths. Unless the virus is a lot less lethal in Sweden than in NYC, you've got to wonder about that estimate. They also think they're going to get to 60% within a few weeks, while also thinking the number of cases is leveling off. I don't know of any way that immunity can spread other than people getting sick and recovering.
Last edited:
Upvote
0